UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.  )

Filed by the Registrant

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Filed by the Registrant ☑
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

under
§240.14a-12

M&T BANK CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other thanother than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

No fee required.

required

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules
14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11.

0-11


(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Feepaid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 


LOGO

 


LOGO

One M&T Plaza

Buffalo, New York 14203

March 7, 20185, 2024

Dear Shareholder,

You are cordially invited to attend the 20182024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of M&T Bank Corporation.  The Annual Meeting willCorporation to be held on the 10th Floor of One M&T Plaza in Buffalo, New York, on Tuesday, April 17, 2018,16, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time.

This year’s meeting will be a virtual Annual Meeting conducted by live webcast only. You will be able to attend the meeting online as more fully described in the accompanying notice of the Annual Meeting and proxy statement.

Shareholders will be asked to vote on the following matters:matters at the virtual Annual Meeting:

1.

election of 1716 directors for one-year terms and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified;

2.

advisory approval of the 20172023 compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers;

3.

ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T Bank Corporation for the year ending December 31, 2018;2024; and

4.

transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournments thereof.

Information about these matters can be found in the proxy statement.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, please indicatewe encourage you to vote your voteshares as promptly as possible via the internet, by promptlytelephone or by executing and returning the enclosedyour signed proxy card or byif one was mailed to you, as further described in the proxy statement.

We encourage you to carefully review this year’s notice and proxy statement, which contain important information about voting, by telephone or overattending the Internet.  Shareholders of record as ofvirtual Annual Meeting and the close of business on February 28, 2018, the record date, are entitled to receive notice of and to votebe conducted at the Annual Meeting.meeting.

We urgeThank you to vote for the election of the 17 nominees, to approve the 2017 compensationyour continued support of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers, and to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T Bank Corporation for the year ending December 31, 2018.&T.

Sincerely,

LOGO

RENÉ F. JONES

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer

 


IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 17, 2018

The Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report of M&T Bank Corporation (“M&T”) are available at http://ir.mandtbank.com/proxy.cfm.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  If your M&T shares of common stock are registered in your name with M&T’s transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered to be a “shareholder of record” and your proxy materials were mailed directly to you.  You may vote in person at the meeting.  You may also vote your shares by telephone, over the Internet or by mailing your signed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope you were provided.  If your M&T shares of common stock are held by a broker, trustee, bank or other nominee, then that nominee is considered the shareholder of record and the shares are considered held in “street name” and you are the beneficial owner of the shares.  M&T provided its proxy materials to that nominee for distribution to you along with its voting instruction card.  As the beneficial owner of the shares, you have the right to direct your broker, trustee, bank or other nominee on how to vote and you are also invited to attend the meeting.  However, if you are a beneficial owner, you are not the shareholder of record and you may not vote your street name shares in person at the meeting unless you follow the instructions from your nominee, which includes obtaining a legal proxy from the nominee that holds your shares.  Please refer to the information your broker, trustee, bank or other nominee provided to you to determine what voting options are available to you.  New York Stock Exchange rules do not permit brokers to vote street name shares on “non-routine” matters such as the election of directors, executive compensation and other “significant matters” unless they have received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.  M&T therefore encourages shareholders whose shares are held in street name to promptly direct their vote for all of the agenda items using the proxy instruction card sent by the broker, trustee, bank or other nominee.

DISCONTINUE MULTIPLE MAILINGS

If you are a shareholder of record and have more than one account in your name or at the same address as other shareholders of record, you may authorize M&T to discontinue mailings of multiple annual reports and proxy statements.  To discontinue multiple mailings, or to reinstate multiple mailings, please either mail your request to M&T Bank Corporation, Attention:  Shareholder Relations, One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203, or send your request to Shareholder Relations via electronic mail at ir@mtb.com.



LOGO

One M&T Plaza,

Buffalo, New York 14203

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

TIME

11:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 16, 2024

PLACE

This year’s Annual Meeting will be held virtually and conducted solely online via webcast. Shareholders as of the record date will be able to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting by visiting: meetnow.global/MKWPZGK. Please see the accompanying proxy statement for important information about attending the virtual Annual Meeting.

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

(1)

Election of 16 directors for one-year terms and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

(2)

Advisory approval of the 2023 compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers.

(3)

Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T Bank Corporation for the year ending December 31, 2024.

(4)

Transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournments thereof.

RECORD DATE

Shareholders of record of M&T’s common stock at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 22, 2024, are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

VOTING

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders as of the record date can vote their shares either during the virtual Annual Meeting or by proxy by using one of the following methods: (1) vote over the internet or by telephone using the instructions in the notice or proxy card; or (2) if you received a proxy card in the mail, complete, sign, date and promptly return the proxy card. Any proxy may be revoked in the manner described in the accompanying proxy statement. Any shareholder of record who attends the virtual Annual Meeting may withdraw his or her proxy and vote personally via the online platform during the Annual Meeting on any matter properly brought before the virtual Annual Meeting.

Please see the accompanying proxy statement for further information.

March 5, 2024

 

March 7, 2018

LOGO

MARIE KING

Corporate Secretary

 


IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 16, 2024

The proxy statement, as well as the message to shareholders and Form 10-K of M&T Bank Corporation (“M&T”) that together comprise our annual report for the year 2023, are available at www.edocumentview.com/MTB.

Virtual Meeting

We are holding the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) in a virtual meeting format exclusively by webcast. No physical meeting will be held.

As more fully described in the “General Information—Questions and Answers” section of the proxy statement, you are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting if, as of the close of business on February 22, 2024, you held shares of M&T common stock registered in your name (a “Registered Holder”), or you held shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, and have a valid legal proxy for the Annual Meeting (a “Beneficial Holder”). Both Registered Holders and Beneficial Holders will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, ask questions and vote during the meeting by visiting meetnow.global/MKWPZGK and following the instructions. Please have your control number, which can be found on your proxy card, notice or email previously received, to access the Annual Meeting. While we expect that the vast majority of Beneficial Holders will be able to participate using the control number received with their voting instruction form, there is no guarantee this option will be available for every type of Beneficial Holders’ control numbers, and some Beneficial Holders may instead have to register in advance of the Annual Meeting. Please see the “General Information—Questions and Answers” section of the proxy statement for more information.

Technical Support

We encourage shareholders to visit the meeting website above in advance of the Annual Meeting to familiarize themselves with the online access process. The virtual Annual Meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (except Internet Explorer) and devices that are equipped with the most updated version of applicable software and plugins.

Shareholders encountering difficulty with the Annual Meeting virtual platform during the sign-in process or at any time during the meeting may utilize technical support provided by M&T through Computershare by calling 1-888-724-2416. Technical support information also is provided on the sign-in page for all shareholders.

Participation and Questions

Shareholders will have substantially the same opportunities to participate in our virtual Annual Meeting as they would have at an in-person meeting. Shareholders as of the record date will be able to attend, vote, examine the shareholder list, and submit questions during a portion of the meeting via the online platform. Shareholders may also submit questions in advance of the Annual Meeting by sending them via email to: ir@mtb.com. Please send any questions in advance of the Annual Meeting by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 12, 2024.

Questions that comply with the Annual Meeting’s rules of conduct and that are germane to the purpose of the Annual Meeting will be answered during the meeting, subject to time constraints. If there are questions regarding matters of personal concern to a shareholder or if a question posed is not answered, M&T’s Market & Investor Relations Department will respond after the Annual Meeting. If we receive substantially similar questions from multiple shareholders, we may group them together. Prior to the Annual Meeting, the meeting website will contain details on other procedures and guidelines relevant to the Annual Meeting, as well as technical support information. Even if you intend to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, to ensure your shares are represented, please vote your shares in advance of the meeting over the internet or by telephone, or complete and return a physical proxy card by mail.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Proxy Summary

PAGE

1

GENERAL INFORMATIONProposal 1QUESTIONS AND ANSWERSElection of Directors

1

9

Nominees for Director

10

PROPOSAL 1

4

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

4

NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR

5

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

14

ElementsCorporate Governance of 2017 Directors’ Fees

14

2017 Director Compensation Table

14

M&T Bank Corporation 2008 Directors’ Stock Plan

15

18

M&T Bank Directors’ Fees

15

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF M&T BANK CORPORATION

16

Corporate Governance Standards

16

18

Availability of Corporate Governance Standards

16

Codes of Ethics

16

Board Composition, Diversity and Refreshment

17

18

Board Independence

17

21

Board Leadership Structure

22

Board Self-Evaluation Process

22

19Board Continuing Education and Orientation

22

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

23

Oversight of Sustainability and ESG Matters

19

24

Board Committees

25

Audit Committee

25

Compensation and Human Capital (C&HC) Committee

26

Executive Committee

26

Nomination and Governance (N&G) Committee

26

Risk Committee

27

Board and Committee Attendance

28

Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics

19

28

Communications with the Board of Directors

19

28

Board Committees and Member Composition During 2017Majority Voting Standard for Director Elections

20

29

AuditC&HC Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

20

29

Executive CommitteeDirector Compensation

21

30

Nomination,2023 Director Compensation and Governance CommitteeTable

21

31

Risk CommitteeStock Ownership Information

22

32

NOMINATION, COMPENSATION AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

23

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

24

Directors and Named Executive Officers Stock Ownership Table

24

32

M&T Bank Corporation Insider Trading Policy

25

Beneficial Owners Holding More Than 5% of M&T Bank Corporation’s Common Stock Table

25

33

Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceReports

26

34

TRANSACTIONS WITH DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERSM&T Bank Corporation Insider Trading Policy

27

34

PROPOSAL 2Transactions with Directors, Executive Officers and Certain Shareholders

28

35

ADVISORY, NON-BINDING PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE 2017 COMPENSATION OFProposal 2 – Advisory, Non-Binding Vote to Approve the 2023 Compensation of M&T BANK CORPORATION’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERSBank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers

28

37

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISCompensation Discussion and Analysis

29

38

Named Executive Officers

29

38

Executive Summary

30

Overview of M&T Bank Corporation

30

39

20172023 Financial Performance Results and Executive Compensation Highlights

30

39

M&T’s Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

40

2023 Say-on-Pay Vote and Shareholder Outreach

31

41

Components of Executive Compensation

42

2023 Performance Year Pay Mix

31

43

Roles and Responsibilities

32

44

Peer Group

34

45

BenchmarkingProcess for Determining 2023 NEO Compensation

34

46

Consideration of Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive2023 NEO Compensation Elements

35

49

2017 Compensation DeterminationsIndividual Performance Assessments

35

54

Summary of 2018 Executive Compensation DeterminationsRetirement and Other Benefits

40

61

Sound Compensation and Governance Practices and Policies

41

62

Stock Ownership Guidelines

41

Forfeiture Policy

41

Discretionary Incentive Award Guidelines

42

Incentive Compensation Governance

42

Enhanced Ability to Adjust Compensation in the Event of an Adverse Risk Outcome

42

Tax Matters

42

63
Compensation and Human Capital Committee Report64
Executive Compensation65

NOMINATION, COMPENSATION AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

43

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

44

20172023 Summary Compensation Table

44

65

CEO Pay Ratio

45

66

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

46

67

2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

46

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

47

68

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End Table

47

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

49

71

2017 Options Exercised and Stock Vested Table

49

Pension Benefits

49

71

2017 Pension Benefits Table

49

Explanation of Pension Benefits Table

50

Qualified Pension Plan

50

Supplemental Pension Plan

51

NonqualifiedNon-qualified Deferred Compensation

52

74

2017 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

52

Overview of Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

52

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-ControlChange in Control

55

77

20172023 Post-Employment Benefits Table

55

77

Severance Pay PlanVersus Performance Disclosure

55

79

Accelerated VestingProposal 3 – Ratification of Equity Awardsthe Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of M&T Bank Corporation for the Year Ending December 31, 2024

55

83

PROPOSAL 3Independent Public Accountants

56

84

PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF M&T BANK CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2018

56

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

57

Fees to Independent Auditors Table

57

84

Audit Fees

57

Audit-Related Fees

57

Tax Fees

57

All Other Fees

57

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

58

85

Report of the Audit Committee

58

85

NOTICE PURSUANT TO SECTIONNotice Pursuant to Section 726(d) OF THE NEW YORK BUSINESS CORPORATION LAWof the New York Business Corporation Law

60

86

OTHER MATTERSOther Matters

60

86
General Information – Questions and Answers87
Appendix A: Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP MeasuresA-1

 

 

i

LOGO

 

i


PROXY SUMMARY

 


PROXY STATEMENT

GENERAL INFORMATION – QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Why am I being provided thisThis “proxy summary” highlights information contained in the proxy statement?statement. It does not contain all of the information you should consider in making a voting decision, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

M&T Bank Corporation (“we”M&T,” “we,” “our,” or “M&T”the “company”) is providing you this proxy statement to you because theits Board of Directors (the “Board”) is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares of M&T common stock at the 20182024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”), or any adjournment or adjournments thereof. ThisThe proxy statement contains information about matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting and certain other information required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

Wematerials are first mailing this proxy statement and the accompanying formbeing made available to shareholders of proxyM&T on or about March 7, 2018 to M&T common shareholders of record as of February 28, 2018.  A copy of M&T Bank Corporation’s Annual Report for 2017, including financial statements, accompanies this proxy statement, but is not part of the proxy solicitation materials.

Where will the Annual Meeting be held and when?

5, 2024. The Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 16, 2024.

For information on the 10th floordetails of One the voting process, how to attend the virtual Annual Meeting and other important procedures, please see “General Information—Questions and Answers” starting on page 87.

Voting Matters and Board Recommendations

Matter:

Board Voting

Recommendation:

For More Information, See:

1. Election of 16 Directors

FOR EACH DIRECTOR
NOMINEE
Proposal 1—Election of Directors, page 9.

2. 2023 Compensation of Named Executive Officers

FORProposal 2—Advisory, Non-Binding Vote to Approve the 2023 Compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers, page 37.

3. Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2024

FORProposal 3—Ratification of the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Independent Registered Accounting Firm of M&T Bank Corporation for the Year Ending December 31, 2024, page 83.

LOGO

1


About Our Company

M&T Plazais a financial holding company headquartered in Buffalo, New York,York. M&T’s principal banking subsidiary, M&T Bank, provides banking products and services across the eastern United States from Maine to Virginia. Trust-related services are provided in select markets across the United States and abroad by M&T’s Wilmington Trust-affiliated companies and M&T Bank.

For more than 165 years, M&T has strived to take an active role in our communities and build long-lasting relationships with our customers.

LOGO

A Bank for Communities

We are a bank for communities—bringing the capabilities of a large bank with the care of a locally focused institution. Our purpose is to make a difference in people’s lives and uplift the communities we serve. The keys to our approach are characterized by responsible lending based on Tuesday, April 17, 2018, at 11:00 a.m.  M&T’s mailing address isthe advantages of local knowledge and scale, and our long history of being prudent stewards of our shareholders’ capital. We pride ourselves on deep local knowledge and understanding the unique needs of our customers and communities.

LOGO

M&T Highlights (as of December 31, 2023)

 One of the 15 largest U.S.-based, commercial bank holding companies*

• National capabilities from our suite of specialty businesses and Wilmington Trust

• More than 22,200 employees

• More than 960 branches

• Contributed over $53.5 million to more than 4,250 nonprofit organizations through its charitable foundation and community sponsorships in 2023

• $208.3 billion in total assets

• $163.3 billion in total deposits

• Total shareholders’ equity of $27.0 billion

• Capital level in top quartile of peer group**:

10.98% Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Capital Ratio

• Net Interest Margin in top quartile of peer group**:

3.83% Net Interest Margin in 2023

*  Based on total assets, excluding certain non-U.S. bank holding companies and non-commercial banks

**  See page 45 of this proxy statement for information on M&T’s peer group

2

LOGO


Proposal 1—Election of Directors

M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203,aims to maintain a highly engaged Board with balanced tenure and its telephone number is (716) 842-5138.substantive expertise that has the diversity of skills and backgrounds necessary to effectively oversee our management team and serve the long-term interests of our shareholders.

Who is entitledWe are asking our shareholders to receive notice of and to voteelect 16 director nominees at the Annual Meeting?Meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Each nominee is elected annually by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast.

Common shareholdersDirector Nominees

Name

AgeBoard
Tenure
(1)
IndependentProfessional BackgroundCurrent
Committee
Membership
(2)

John P. Barnes

682 yearsFormer Chairman and CEO of People’s United Financial, Inc.R

Robert T. Brady(3)

8329 yearsFormer Chairman and CEO of Moog Inc.N&G (Chair),
E

Carlton J. Charles

651 yearSenior Vice President of Treasury and Risk Management, HearstN&G

Jane Chwick

612 yearsFormer Partner and Co-COO of the Technology Division at Goldman SachsR

William F. Cruger, Jr.

652 yearsFormer Vice Chairman of Investment Banking at J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.A

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

8123 yearsFormer Chairman and CEO of Premier National Bancorp, Inc. and Premier National BankA

Gary N. Geisel

7514 yearsFormer Chairman and CEO of Provident Bankshares Corporation and Provident BankC&HC (Chair),

E

Leslie V. Godridge

683 yearsFormer Vice Chair and Co-Head of Corporate and Commercial Banking for US BancorpR

René F. Jones(4)

596 yearsChairman and CEO of M&T and M&T BankE

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

666 yearsFormer Deputy Director and COO of the National Security AgencyR

Melinda R. Rich

6615 yearsChairman of Rich Products CorporationC&HC, E

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.

7825 yearsFormer President and CEO of M&TE (Chair),

R (Chair)

Denis J. Salamone

708 yearsFormer Chairman and CEO of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Hudson City Savings BankA (Chair)

Rudina Seseri

463 yearsFounder and Managing Partner of Glasswing Ventures, LLC

Kirk W. Walters

682 years

Former Senior Executive Vice President of

People’s United Financial, Inc.

Herbert L. Washington

7328 yearsPresident of HLW Fast Track, Inc.A, C&HC

(1)

As of the 2024 Annual Meeting (April 16, 2024).

(2)

The committees of the M&T Board of Directors are as follows: A—Audit Committee; C&HC—Compensation and Human Capital Committee; E—Executive Committee; N&G—Nomination and Governance Committee; R—Risk Committee.

(3)

Mr. Brady serves as the non-executive Vice Chairman of the Board and as the lead independent director.

(4)

Mr. Jones serves as the Chairman of the Board.

LOGO

3


Board Composition

A balanced Board composition, supplemented by a thoughtful approach to director refreshment, is a priority for M&T. In discharging its duties to review director nominees, the Nomination and Governance Committee (the “N&G Committee”) considers the experience, skill set, independence and diversity of recordnominees in the full context of the current composition, needs and obligations of the Board.

Director Experience and Skills. The 16 director nominees represent a range of backgrounds, professions, skills, experiences and communities. The Board believes these complementary skills and experiences produce an effective and highly qualified Board. Information on the skills and diversity characteristics of the Board, including a Board Skills Matrix, can be found in the Corporate Governance of M&T Bank Corporation section of this proxy statement.

Board Diversity, Tenure and Independence. M&T strives to foster an inclusive workplace where we respect and value individual differences. We believe that employee diversity enhances our company’s ability to succeed at 5:00 p.m.all levels. M&T also values diversity among its Board members.

In addition to identifying nominees that possess diverse business experiences, skill sets and geographic backgrounds, the N&G Committee believes a stronger Board is one that reflects gender and racial diversity. Our Chairman and CEO, René Jones, is one of fewer than 10 Black CEOs leading an S&P 500 company.* Since Mr. Jones became Chairman and CEO in late 2017, the percentage of diverse directors serving on February 28, 2018 are entitledthe Board has increased from approximately 19% in 2017 to receive notice41% of current directors and to vote44% of nominees at the Annual Meeting. On February 28, 2018,The N&G Committee also believes it is desirable to maintain a mix of experienced, longer-tenured directors who possess deep institutional knowledge along with newer directors who have different expertise, backgrounds and fresh perspectives.

LOGOLOGOLOGO

At the 2024 Annual Meeting, approximately 44% of our 16 director nominees represent diverse constituencies, including four women and three people of color. The director nominees range in age from 46 to 83, and the average age is approximately 68. Approximately 44% of the director nominees have served on the Board for five years or less.

*

As of March 2023. Forbes, “Record Number of Black CEOs Will Run S&P 500 Companies,” March 1, 2023, www.forbes.com/sites/jaredcouncil/2023/03/01/record-number-of-black-ceos-will-run-sp-500-companies

See “Proposal 1—Election of Directors” and “Corporate Governance of M&T had outstanding 148,509,336 sharesBank Corporation” further below for more information on our director nominees as well as Board qualifications, tenure, independence and diversity.

4

LOGO


LOGO

Corporate Governance Practices

The Board is committed to sound and effective corporate governance that conforms to the highest standards of business ethics and integrity, provides robust oversight of management and promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders. The Board reviews M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards annually. It regularly reviews other governance practices, industry developments and shareholder feedback to promote continued effectiveness. Below are selected highlights of M&T’s corporate governance practices.

Board Composition and Refreshment

Robust Shareholder Rights

✓ Engaged Board with balanced tenure and substantial experience

✓ Bylaws include proxy access right

✓ Strong Board refreshment practices, with seven of the current director nominees joining the Board in the last four years

✓ All shareholders have the same voting rights

✓ Regular refreshment at the committee level

✓ Bylaws provide shareholders the ability to call a special meeting

✓ Ongoing and formalized director nominee identification and selection process based on needs identified by the Board

✓ No super-majority voting requirements under the Bylaws

✓ Diverse skills represented, including risk management, cybersecurity, leadership, finance, commercial and retail banking, technology, and corporate governance

✓ No poison pill or other anti-takeover devices in effect

Board Accountability and Independence

Board Effectiveness

✓ Audit Committee, Compensation and Human Capital Committee, Nomination and Governance Committee, and Risk Committee comprised entirely of independent directors

✓ Committee oversight of ESG strategy and policies, (Nomination and Governance Committee), diversity, equity and inclusion (Compensation and Human Capital Committee), climate risk (Risk Committee), and ESG public reporting (Audit Committee)

✓ Majority voting standard for director elections

✓ Lead independent director role and executive sessions of non-management directors held regularly

✓ All directors elected annually

✓ Strong Board leadership in risk oversight and management through Risk Committee and risk governance framework

✓ Conflict of interest policy for directors

✓ Annual Board and committee self-evaluations

✓ Stock ownership guidelines for directors and executives

✓ Independent Board evaluation of CEO performance and compensation through Compensation and Human Capital Committee

✓ Pledging and hedging policies for directors and executives

✓ Corporate Governance Standards and committee charters reviewed annually

✓ Directors are subject to over-boarding review

✓ Average attendance of directors at Board and committee meetings held in 2023 approximately 96%

See “Corporate Governance of common stock, $0.50 par value per share.  Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote.  Shares may not be voted at the Annual Meeting unless the owner is present or represented by proxy, as more fully explainedM&T Bank Corporation” further below in this proxy statement.statement for more information on our corporate governance practices.

How can I

LOGO

5


Proposal 2—Advisory, Non-Binding Vote on 2023 Compensation of Named Executive Officers

We are asking our shareholders to review and vote, by proxy?

You can vote by proxy by completingon an advisory basis, on the 2023 compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”). As described in the “Compensation Discussion and returning the physical proxy card accompanyingAnalysis” section of this proxy statement, or by followingour executive compensation policies and practices are centered on creating a pay-for-performance culture that drives M&T performance, aligns the telephone or Internet voting procedures described oninterests of our executives with the proxy card.  The telephonelong-term interests of our shareholders and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate that you are a shareholder by use of a control numberreduces incentives for unnecessary and allow you to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.  If you are a shareholder of record, the method by which you vote will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you later decide to attend in person.excessive risk-taking.

 

LOGO

Executive Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program aims to create a culture of pay-for-performance by offering short- and long-term incentive compensation opportunities that reward executives for their individual contributions as well as M&T’s long-term performance.

Compensation Philosophy. Our compensation philosophy is to emphasize long-term equity-based compensation and provide competitive compensation opportunities that will attract and retain executive officers capable of achieving M&T’s performance objectives. Overseen by the Compensation and Human Capital (“C&HC”) Committee, this philosophy allows us to align our compensation with performance by:

• linking the size of individual equity awards to the NEO’s role, responsibilities and prior and anticipated future contributions, as well as to the performance of M&T;

• tying a significant portion of each NEO’s ultimate realized compensation to the future value of M&T common stock, in alignment with our shareholders;

• balancing growth with prudent risk taking, including through the C&HC Committee’s consideration of each NEO’s performance with respect to risk management and the use of performance-based stock unit awards that vest in alignment with levels of performance;

• creating a culture of stock ownership and retention, including through M&T’s Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for Executives, resulting in each NEO having a substantial financial stake tied to the long-term performance of M&T and further ensuring our NEOs’ alignment with shareholders;

• performing, for each NEO, an annual assessment of the “market price of the seat” and balancing external data with an executive’s experience, role, responsibilities and prior and anticipated future contributions; and

• assessing short-term performance and awarding variable compensation based on a balanced discretionary assessment of holistic bank and individual performance.

The following illustrates some important features of our executive compensation program:

What We Do:What We Don’t Do:

✓ Strong alignment between pay and performance

LOGOHedging or pledging of M&T securities (except in limited circumstances pursuant to prescribed policy)

✓ Discourage excessive risk taking through program design

LOGORepricing of stock options

✓ Maintain robust Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines

LOGO“Timing” of equity grants (i.e., instead, we only grant long-term incentives on pre-determined dates)

✓ Retain an independent compensation consultant to advise and support the C&HC Committee in its role

LOGOTax gross-ups (other than in connection with relocation)

✓ Maintain a compensation forfeiture policy which subjects incentives to risk adjustments

LOGOPay dividends on unvested stock units or unearned performance units

✓ Review share utilization

LOGOGrant excessive severance, pension or other benefits

✓ Annual risk assessment of incentive compensation plans

LOGOEnter into employment contracts with our executives

✓ Routinely engage with shareholders

✓ Use a peer group to provide perspective on competitive pay levels

6

 

1LOGO


May I revoke my proxy?Total Compensation Pay Mix

How you hold your shares (shareholderOur executive compensation program provides for a mix of record orbase salary, short-term cash incentives and long-term equity-based incentives that vest over time in street name) determines howalignment with our compensation philosophy and when you may revoke your proxy.  A shareholderthe objectives cited above.

The charts below show the 2023 performance year total compensation pay mix of record may revoke a proxy that has been previously given at any time before it is exercised by giving written noticeour CEO and the average of such revocation or by delivering a later dated proxy, in either case, toour other NEOs. For this purpose, compensation for the Corporate Secretary, at One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203, or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.  A beneficial owner“performance year” consists of shares in street name must follow the instructions from his or her broker, trustee, bank or other nominee to revoke his or her previously given proxy.

How will my proxy be voted?

Your proxy will be voted in accordance with the directions you provide.  If you sign, date and return your proxy card but do not specify how you want to vote your shares, your shares will be voted FOR the election(i) annual base salary as directors of the 17 persons named underend of 2023, (ii) short-term cash incentive (“STI”) paid in 2024 for 2023 performance, and (iii) the long-term equity-based incentive (“LTI”) award (target value) granted in 2024 for 2023 performance.

Our LTI award is a mix of performance-vested stock units (“PVSUs”), performance-hurdled stock units (“PHSUs”) and non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”). As shown here, 88% of 2023 performance year target pay is “at risk” for our CEO and, on average, 83% is “at risk” for our other NEOs.

LOGOLOGO

* Excludes one NEO (Doris Meister) who was not granted an LTI award in 2024 in light of her upcoming transition to a consulting role as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section below.

As described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section titled “NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR”; FOR approvingof this proxy statement:

Annual base salary provides market-competitive, fixed pay reflective of an executive’s role, responsibilities and performance.

STIprovides a discretionary annual incentive opportunity that is reflective of overall bank and individual performance. STI is awarded on corporate performance, quantitative and qualitative business unit and individual performance, and progress toward strategic initiatives.

PHSUsvest ratably at target each year over three years based on achievement of a pre-established performance hurdle for each year. If the performance hurdle is not met for a given year, the portion of the award scheduled to vest for the corresponding year will be forfeited.

PVSUs cliff vest after three years based on achievement of the pre-established performance metrics over the three-year performance period, with final payout values ranging from 0% to 150% of target.

NQSOs align our NEOs’ interests with those of shareholders by providing value only if M&T’s stock price increases from the date the stock option award is granted. NQSOs vest ratably over three years.

See “Proposal 2—Advisory, Non-Binding Vote to Approve the 2017 compensation2023 Compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers; and FOR ratifyingOfficers” further below in this proxy statement for more information.

LOGO

7


Proposal 3—Ratification of the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Year Ending December 31, 2024

We are asking shareholders to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024.

The Audit Committee annually evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditor. As a result of this evaluation, on February 20, 2024, the Audit Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2018.2024. The Audit Committee and Board believe the continued retention of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is in the best interests of M&T and its shareholders.

What is required for a quorum at the Annual Meeting?

The presence in person or by proxySee “Proposal 3—Ratification of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.  Broker non-votes will be counted as being present or represented at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum, but, under NYSE rules, brokers will not be permitted to vote in the election of directors or on the advisory vote to approve the compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers unless specific voting instructions are provided to the broker.  We therefore encourage beneficial owners of shares whose shares are held in street name to direct their vote for all agenda items on the form of proxy or instruction card sent by his or her broker, trustee, bank or other nominee.

What happens if an incumbent director nominee does not receive a majority of votes in favor of his or her election?

Pursuant to M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, in an uncontested election of directors, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the nominee is required for the election of such nominee as a director, assuming a quorum is present or represented at the Annual Meeting.  If an incumbent director does not receive the required affirmative vote, that director would be required to tender his or her resignation to the Board of Directors for consideration in accordance with the Amended and Restated Bylaws.

What approval is necessary to approve Proposals 2 and 3?

For each of Proposals 2 and 3, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the 2017 compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers and to ratify the appointmentAppointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2018.

An abstention will not constitute a vote cast and therefore will not affect the outcome of the vote on the election of directors, the advisory vote to approve the 2017 compensationIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers, or the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&TCorporation for the year endingYear Ending December 31, 2018.  Broker2024” further below in this proxy statement for more information.

 

8

2

 

LOGO


non-votes will not constitute votes cast for the election of directors or for the approval of the compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers, and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of either of these proposals.LOGO

Who is paying for the solicitation of proxies?

M&T will bear the cost of soliciting proxies in the accompanying form of proxy.  We are making this solicitation by mail, by telephone and in person using the services of some employees of M&T or its subsidiaries at nominal cost.  We will reimburse brokers, trustees, banks and other nominees for expenses they incur in mailing proxy materials to beneficial owners of M&T’s common stock.

How do I propose actions for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders?

In order for a shareholder proposal for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be eligible for inclusion in M&T’s proxy statement, we must receive it at our principal executive offices no later than November 7, 2018.  You must provide your proposal to us in writing and your notice must contain the information required by M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws.

M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws state that no business may be brought before an annual meeting of shareholders unless it is specified in the notice of the meeting or is otherwise brought before the meeting by the Board of Directors or by a shareholder entitled to receive notice of and to vote who has delivered notice to M&T (containing the information specified in the Amended and Restated Bylaws) not less than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which M&T first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders.  These requirements are separate from and in addition to the SEC’s requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a shareholder proposal included in M&T’s proxy statement.  A shareholder wishing to submit a proposal for consideration at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, either under SEC Rule 14a-8 or otherwise, should do so no later than November 7, 2018.

What do I have to bring in order to attend the Annual Meeting in person?

In order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting, you will need to bring a valid photo ID or other satisfactory proof of identification.  If you are a beneficial owner of shares in street name, you must also bring evidence of your M&T share ownership that can include a notice from your broker, trustee, bank or other nominee regarding the availability of these proxy materials or a recent account statement from the broker, trustee, bank, or other nominee that holds your shares and confirms your beneficial ownership of those shares.PROXY STATEMENT

 

3

 PROPOSAL 1


PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

M&T’s current Board of Directors is comprised of persons who were identified as being qualified director candidates by management and the Board of Directors.  

Upon the recommendation of the Nomination, Compensation and GovernanceN&G Committee, (the “NCG Committee”), the Board of Directors recommends the following 1716 persons for election as directors of M&T, to hold office until the 20192025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.  Thirteen

Each of the 17 nominees listed below werewas elected at the 20172023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

If anyOne current director, Mr. John R. Scannell, is not a nominee and his term will end at the Annual Meeting. The Board would like to thank Mr. Scannell for any reason, becomes unavailable for election, or if a vacancy occurs beforehis years of service and valuable contributions to M&T and the election (which events are not expected), it is intended that the shares represented by the proxies will be voted for such other person, if any, as the NCG Committee shall designate.Board.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH
OF THE 17

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH

OF THE 16 NOMINEES.

Each nominee’s business experience, including occupation, current public company directorships, and public company directorships held at any time during the past five years is provided. Additionally, the specific experience, qualifications and skills, including education, of each nominee that was considered by the NCG Committee are listed.

The information with respect to each nominee is as of February 28, 2018,March 1, 2024, and includes each nominee’s affiliationspositions, if any, with M&T’s subsidiary banks, M&T Bank (also known as Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (also known as “M&T Bank”)Company) and Wilmington Trust, National Association (“Wilmington Trust, N.A.”). The information contained in this proxy statement concerning the nominees is based upon statements made or confirmed to M&T by or on behalf of such nominees, except to the extent certain information is contained in M&T’s records.

The Board of Directors believes that the experience, qualifications and skills of each of the director nominees contributes to an effective and well-functioning board providing oversight of M&T’s business and management.

 

4

LOGO

 

9


NOMINEES FORFOR DIRECTOR

 

BRENT D. BAIRD. BAIRD

JOHN P. BARNES

Chairman of the

Nomination, Compensation and GovernanceLOGO

Committee

Risk Committee Member of the
Executive Committee

Director since 1983

2022 

Mr. Baird,Barnes, age 79, is a private investor.  He68, is the former PresidentChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Merchants GroupPeople’s United Financial, Inc. and a former general partner of Trubee, Collins & Co., Inc.  Mr. Baird(“People’s United”). He served as Chief Executive Officer of People’s United from July 2010 until April 2022, when he joined the M&T Board upon the closing of M&T’s acquisition of People’s United. Mr. Barnes also previously served as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer for People’s United following its acquisition of Chittenden Corporation in early 2008. He had served as an Executive Vice President and in multiple other positions at Chittenden Corporation, including heading the Credit Policy and Administration Division. Mr. Barnes is a member of the Risk Committee of the Board. He is also a director of Todd Shipyards Corporation (NYSE: TOD) from 1992 to 2011.  He is a director ofM&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Executive Committee and its Trust and InvestmentRisk Committee.  Mr. Baird is also a member of M&T Bank’s Directors Advisory Council of the New York City/Long Island Division.

Experience, Qualifications and Skills

Mr. Baird has significant investment management and corporate governance expertise having served in numerous executive positions in public and private companies.  Mr. Baird holds a Bachelor of Arts with Honors from Williams College.

C. ANGELA BONTEMPO

 

Chair of the

Audit Committee

Director since 1991

Ms. Bontempo, age 77, is a self-employed health care consultant.  She serves as a consultant to Community Health Systems, Inc. (NYSE: CYH), to Enterprise Analysis Corp. in Stamford, Connecticut and to Ciminelli Properties, LLC in Buffalo, New York.  Ms. Bontempo also serves as a member of the Niagara University’s Business School Council.  She formerly served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of Saint Vincent Health System in Erie, Pennsylvania, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Bryant & Stratton College, a system of proprietary colleges headquartered in Buffalo, New York, as Senior Vice President and Executive Director of the Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York and as a director of iPorta Corporation in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.  Ms. Bontempo is a director of M&T Bank and the Chair of its Examining Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Bontempo hasMr. Barnes brings extensive experience overseeingbanking and finance knowledge, having worked in the financial personnelservices industry since 1983, when he joined Chittenden Corporation after five years with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in Boston. He brings exceptional executive and auditing and financial reporting.  She has considerable executive leadership and decision-making skillsmanagement experience gained through her positionshis leadership roles at not-for-profit organizations, privately held companiesmultiple financial institutions. Mr. Barnes is a graduate of Northeastern University and professional associations.  Ms. Bontempo holds a Bachelor of Arts in Education and a Bachelor of Arts in Theology from St. Joseph’s College, an Associate in Applied Science in Nursing from Maria College,received a Master of Science in Microbiology from Howard University and a Master of HealthBusiness Administration from St. Louis University.  She further holds an Advanced Certification in Finance from Yale University.the University of Vermont.

 

5


ROBERT T. BRADY

LOGO

Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors

Member of the Nomination, Compensation and Governance

CommitteeLead Independent Director

 

Member of theNomination and Governance Committee Chair

Executive Committee Member

Director since

1994

Mr. Brady, age 77,83, serves as Vice Chairman of M&T’s Board of Directors and as its lead independent director. He is the former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Moog Inc. (NYSE: MOG.A), a worldwide manufacturer of control systems and components for aircraft, spacecraft, automated machinery and medical equipment. HeMr. Brady served as Moog’s Executive Chairman from 2011 until his retirement on January 31,in 2014. Mr. BradyHe is a director of Astronics Corporation (NASDAQ: ATRO) where he serves as lead independent director, chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Audit and the Compensation and Nominating/Governance Committees.  He is a director of Multisorb Technologies, a privately held company that specializes in packaging technology located in Buffalo, New York.Sustainability Committee. Mr. Brady is also a director of ENrG, Inc., a privately held manufacturing company located in Buffalo, New York and serves on its Audit and Compensation Committees. Mr. Brady is a director of CUBRC, Inc., a research, development, testing and systems integration company located in Buffalo, New York. He previously served as a director of ENrG, Inc., Seneca Foods Corporation (NASDAQGS: SENEA) and of, National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE: NFG)., Acme Electric, and the Buffalo AKG Art Museum. Mr. Brady is a directormember of the Albright-Knox Art Gallery in Buffalo, New YorkExecutive Committee and serves onChair of the University at Buffalo Council.  Mr. BradyNomination and Governance Committee of the Board. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Executive Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Brady is an experienced and successful business leader with a track record of helping companies innovate, grow and create jobs. He brings insight into risk management, operational risk and strategic planning. In addition to his significant leadership experience with several public companies, Mr. Brady has considerable corporate governance experience. Mr. BradyHe holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School.

 

10

 

LOGO


CARLTON J. CHARLES

LOGO

Nomination and Governance Committee Member

Director since

2023 

Mr. Charles, age 65, is the Senior Vice President of Treasury and Risk Management at Hearst, a leading global, diversified information, services and media company with operations in 40 countries. Prior to joining Hearst, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Operational Risk Officer at Moody’s Corporation. Mr. Charles also serves as the Chair of Level Up Ventures, a venture capital unit within Hearst focused on Black and Latino entrepreneurs. He is a member of the Hearst Board of Directors and is on the Board of Advisors for HearstLab, Hearst’s platform for supporting early-stage, women-led companies. Mr. Charles also serves on the Advisory Board of BUILD, which teaches entrepreneurship to youth in underserved communities. He is a member of the Executive Leadership Council and a governance fellow at the National Association of Corporate Directors. Mr. Charles was previously on the Board of Trustees of St. Thomas Aquinas College and previously served on the Board of the Bronx Preparatory Charter School, where he chaired the Audit Committee. He is a member of the Nomination and Governance Committee of the Board. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Charles brings extensive experience and knowledge in corporate finance, risk management, cybersecurity, retail and consumer operations, and corporate governance. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Quantitative Economics and a Master of Public Policy from the State University of New York at Stony Brook and a Master of Business Administration in Finance from the University of Chicago.

JANE CHWICK

LOGO

Risk Committee Member

Director since

2022 

Ms. Chwick, age 61, served as a director of People’s United from 2017 until April 2022, when she joined the M&T Board upon the closing of M&T’s acquisition of People’s United. She previously served as a partner at Goldman Sachs where she had a 30-year career in technology, including most recently as the Co-Chief Operating Officer of the Technology Division. As Co-Chief Operating Officer, Ms. Chwick was responsible for financial business planning, setting the technical strategy and management of an 8,000-person organization within the firm. While at Goldman Sachs, she also served as a member of many governance committees, including the firm’s Finance Committee, the firm-wide New Activity Committee and the Technology Risk Committee, and she was Co-Chair of the Technology Division Operating Committee. Ms. Chwick was also the Co-founder and Co-CEO of Trewtec, Inc., providing corporate directors, chief executive officers and chief technology officers with the information to improve their oversight of a company’s technology division. She is a director of Voya Financial (NYSE: VOYA), MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX) and Thoughtworks Holding Inc. (NASDAQ: TWKS). At Voya Financial, Ms. Chwick is Chair of the Technology, Innovation and Operations Committee, a member of the Risk, Investment and Finance Committee, and a member of the Nomination, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee. At MarketAxess, she is Chair of the Risk Committee and a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. At Thoughtworks Holding Inc., Ms. Chwick is a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation and Talent Committee. She is a member of the Risk Committee of the Board. She is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Risk Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Chwick brings extensive technology experience, gained in a global financial services firm, combined with strategic perspective and in-depth knowledge of the financial services industry. She holds an undergraduate degree in Mathematics from Queens College, and a Master of Business Administration with a concentration in quantitative analysis from St. John’s University.

LOGO

11


WILLIAM F. CRUGER, JR.

LOGO

Audit Committee Member

Director since

2022 

Mr. Cruger, age 65, served as a director of People’s United from 2014 until April 2022, when he joined the M&T Board upon the closing of M&T’s acquisition of People’s United. He served as Vice Chairman of Investment Banking at J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., a leading global financial services firm, until August 2013. Mr. Cruger’s responsibilities included senior client relationship management and transaction leadership with a primary focus on financial institutions, among other sectors. He was Managing Director, Financial Institutions Group at J.P. Morgan Chase from 1996 until 2011 when he was elevated to the position of Vice Chairman. Mr. Cruger also ran the firm’s investment banking practices in Japan from 1991 to 1996, in Latin America from 1989 to 1991, and in Emerging Asia from 1984 to 1988. He is a director of MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX), serving as Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and a member of the Audit and Finance Committees, and of Virtu Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: VIRT), serving as Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Risk Committee. Mr. Cruger has also previously served as a director of Archipelago, Capital IQ and Credittrade. He is a member of the Audit Committee of the Board. Mr. Cruger is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Examining Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Cruger has diverse experience in investment banking at a global financial services firm and extensive knowledge of financial institutions and financial markets. His leadership roles as a director of other financial services firms and his international business experience bring critical skills and strategic insight to the Board. Mr. Cruger holds a Bachelor of Arts from Clark University and a Master of Business Administration from Columbia University.

T. JEFFERSON CUNNINGHAM III

Member of the

RiskLOGO

Audit Committee Member

Director since

2001

Mr. Cunningham, age 75,81, is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Magnolia Capital Management, Ltd.,Ltd, a registered investment adviser in Cold Spring, New York. He is the former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Premier National Bancorp, Inc. and Premier National Bank, and of Premier’s predecessors. Mr. Cunningham had a distinguished career in various board and executive-level positions with several leading U.S. and European financial institutions. He is a trustee of Open Space Institute, an environmental conservation organization dedicated to protecting significant landscapes in New York State, where he serves on several committees and as Chairman of its FinanceCompensation Committee. HeMr. Cunningham is an advisory directorboard member of the Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley in Poughkeepsie, New York. He is a member of the Audit Committee of the Board. Mr. Cunningham is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, a member of its RiskExamining Committee and the Chairman of M&T Bank’sits Directors Advisory Council of the Hudson Valley Division.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Cunningham has extensive experience with commercial and investment banking strategy, both domestically and internationally. He brings in-depth knowledge of risk management, fiduciary oversight responsibility and a valuable international perspective to M&T’s business activities. Mr. Cunningham holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from Cornell University and a Master of Business Administration from Stanford University.

 

12

6

 

LOGO


GARY N. GEISEL

Member

LOGO

Chair of the Nomination, Compensation and GovernanceHuman Capital Committee

Member of the

Risk Committee

Director since 2009

 

Executive Committee Member

Director since

2009 

Mr. Geisel, age 69,75, is the retired former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Provident Bankshares Corporation and Provident Bank. He previously served as Chairman of the Board of Saint Agnes Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland having served on its Finance, Governance, Compensation and Executive Committees. Mr. Geisel is a former director of Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake and served as its Chairman and on the Executive Committee. He is a former director of Annapolis Life Care, Inc., a continuing-care retirement community operator in Annapolis, Maryland, where he served as a member of its Finance and Audit Committee. Mr. Geisel is also a member of the Budget and Finance Committee of the Baltimore Community Foundation. He is a directorthe past Chair of the Finance Committee of Urban Teachers, a non-profit teacher preparation program in Baltimore, Maryland and serves as the Chairman of its Compensation Committee.Maryland. Mr. Geisel is a directorthe Chair of M&T Bankthe Compensation and Human Capital Committee and a member of the Executive Committee of the Board. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, a member of its RiskExecutive Committee, and serves as ChairmanChair of M&T Bank’sits Directors Advisory Council of the Baltimore-Washington Division.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Geisel brings financial acumen with over 3035 years of experience in the banking industry as well as exceptional executive leadership. He holds a Bachelor of Science from Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, a Master of Business Administration from Duquesne University and completed banking programs at the Stonier Graduate School of Banking.

 

RICHARD S. GOLD

LESLIE V. GODRIDGE

President and

Chief Operating OfficerLOGO

 

Director since

December 2017Risk Committee Member

 

Mr. Gold, age 57, was appointed PresidentChair of the Trust and Chief Operating Officer and a Director of M&T andInvestment Committee of M&T Bank effective December 20, 2017.  He

Director since

2020 

Ms. Godridge, age 68, served as an Executive Vice PresidentChair and Co-Head of M&T from 2007 to 2017Corporate and as Chief Risk OfficerCommercial Banking for U.S. Bancorp, member of M&T from 2014 to April 3, 2017.  Mr. Goldthe Managing Committee and served as a Vice Chairmandirector of M&TU.S. Bank, N.A.’s Board of Directors, roles she held from 2014 to 2017 and2016 until her retirement in 2020. She joined U.S. Bancorp in 2007 as Chief Risk Officer of M&T Bank from 2014 to April 3, 2017.  He was an Executive Vice President of M&T Bank from 2006 to 2014.  Mr. Gold is an Executive Vice President and Head of National Corporate & Special Industries and Global Treasury Management. Previously, Ms. Godridge worked for The Bank of New York for 25 years in a Directorvariety of Wilmington Trust, N.A. He servessenior managerial roles, culminating as Head of Consumer, Commercial, Private Banking and Asset Management. She has been recognized repeatedly on the Buffalo Seminary Board of Trustees in Buffalo, New York and on the Board of DirectorsAmerican Banker’s list of the Westminster FoundationMost Powerful Women in Buffalo,Banking. Ms. Godridge is a director of Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBGI), serving as the Chair of the Audit Committee. She is also a director and Audit Committee member of National Integrity Life Insurance Co. and of Gerber Life Insurance Company and serves as a Trustee and the Treasurer of the Museum of the City of New York. Mr. GoldShe is a member of the Risk Committee of the Board. Ms. Godridge is also a director of the Buffalo Niagara Partnership,M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, a member of its Risk Committee and Chair of its Trust and Investment Committee. In addition, she is an Advisory Member of the Consumer Bankers Association BoardTrust and Investment Committees of DirectorsWilmington Trust, N.A., a subsidiary of M&T, and has been an adjunct professor at the State UniversityWilmington Trust Company, a subsidiary of New York at Buffalo's School of Management since 2012.M&T Bank.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Gold joined M&T Bank in 1989 as an Executive AssociateMs. Godridge brings extensive banking and has over 30finance knowledge with nearly 40 years of experience in banking.  He has served M&T Bank in numerousthe banking industry. She also brings exceptional executive and managerialmanagement experience gained through her senior executive positions in retail banking, consumer lending, mortgage, business banking and risk, and oversight of the legal division, which have provided him with valuable institutional knowledge.  Mr. Goldat financial institutions. Ms. Godridge holds a Bachelor of ScienceArts from Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor RelationsSmith College and a Master of Business Administration from New York University Stern School of Business.

 

LOGO

 

13

7


RICHARD A. GROSSI

RENÉ F. JONES

 

Member of the

Audit Committee

Director since 2015LOGO

 

Mr. Grossi, age 70, is the former Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialExecutive Officer of Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland where he served as such from 1996 to 2015.  He currently serves as a consultant for Johns Hopkins Medicine and other organizations.  Mr. Grossi is a director and the Treasurer of Biotechnology Institute of Maryland, a non-profit scientific training program in Baltimore, Maryland.  He is also a member of the Trustee Audit Committee of Catholic Charities of Maryland.  Mr. Grossi has more than 40 years of experience in higher education and the health care industry.  He is a director of M&T Bank and a member of its Examining Committee and a member of M&T Bank’s Directors Advisory Council of the Baltimore-Washington Division.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Grossi’s areas of expertise include financial analysis and management, organizational design and development, human resource management, systems selection and implementation, operational and financial responsibility for large functional units, and responsibility for major facility construction and control.  He is experienced in strategic planning, cash management and treasury, new business initiatives, trustee interactions in financial decisions, oversight of budgeting and capital planning, general accounting and financial reporting.  Mr. Grossi holds a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting and a Master of Business Administration in Financial Management from Pace University.

JOHN D. HAWKE, JR.

Chairman of the

Risk Committee

Director since 2012

Mr. Hawke, age 84, is Senior Counsel with the Washington, D.C. based international law firm of Arnold & Porter LLP, where he previously served as a partner and as Chairman of the firm, having established one of the nation’s premier financial services practices.  He has extensive experience with financial regulation and bank supervision, having served as the Comptroller of the Currency from 1998 to 2004, Under-Secretary of the Treasury for Domestic Finance from 1995 to 1998 and as General Counsel to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System from 1975 to 1978.  Mr. Hawke is a director of M&T Bank and serves as Chairman of its Risk Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

As Comptroller of the Currency, Mr. Hawke was a member of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.  He taught courses on federal regulation of banking and bank acquisitions at the Georgetown University Law Center and at the Morin Center for Banking Law Studies at Boston University School of Law. Mr. Hawke has published extensively on matters relating to the regulation of banking institutions.  He holds a Bachelor of Arts in English from Yale University and a Bachelor of Laws from Columbia University Law School.

8


RENÉ F. JONES

Chief Executive Officer

 

Chairman of the

Board of DirectorsExecutive Committee Member

 

Member of the

Executive Committee

Director since

December 2017

Mr. Jones, age 53, was appointed59, has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of M&T and of M&T Bank effectivesince December 20, 2017. He is a member of the Executive CommitteeCommittees of M&T and M&T Bank. Mr. Jones served as an Executive Vice President of M&T from 2006 to 2017.  He2017, served as Chief Financial Officer of M&T and M&T Bank from 2005 to 2016 and as a Vice Chairman of M&T Bank from 2014 to 2017. Mr. Jones is the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Wilmington Trust, N.A. and is the Chairman of its Trust and Investment Committee.  He also serves as a director ofand a number of principal subsidiaries of M&T Bank.  Mr. Jones serves on the Board of Directorsmember of the Westminster Foundation in Buffalo, New York, Roswell Park Cancer Institute’s Alliance Foundation in Buffalo, New York and the Jacobs Institute, a non-profit medical device innovation center in Buffalo, New York.Audit Committee of ACV Auctions Inc. (NASDAQ: ACVA). He is also a director and member of the FinanceAudit and Risk Committee of Independent Health in Buffalo,the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.York and previously served as a member of the Federal Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve Board. Mr. Jones serves as Vice Chair of the Board of the Bank Policy Institute and a steward for the Council for Inclusive Capitalism. He is also on the Board of OverseersTrustees of Boston College, a member of the Massachusetts Historical Society and is a trusteeUB Council of the Burchfield Penny Art Center inState University of New York at Buffalo, New York.  and a director of the Pan-Massachusetts Challenge, Inc., a nonprofit that raises money for adult and pediatric cancer treatment and research.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Jones joined M&T Bank in 1992 as an Executive Associate and has over 2530 years of experience in banking. He has served M&T Bank in numerous executive and managerial positions in the finance, wealthFinance, Wealth and institutional services, human resources, consumer lending, mortgage,Institutional Services, Human Resources, Consumer Lending, Mortgage, and treasury divisionsTreasury Divisions which have provided him with valuable institutional knowledge. Mr. Jones receivedholds a Bachelor of Science in Management Science from Boston College and a Master of Business Administration with concentrations in Finance, Organization and Markets from the University of Rochester Simon School of Business.

 

RICHARD H. LEDGETT, JR.

 

Director since

August 2017LOGO

 

Risk Committee Member

Director since

2017 

Mr. Ledgett, age 60,66, is a private consultant. He served as Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer of the National Security Agency (“NSA”), the largest intelligence organization in the U.S., from January 2014 until his retirement in April 2017, and worked for the NSA for 29 years. Mr. Ledgett is Chair of Board of Trustees of the Institute for Defense Analyses, a member of the U.S. Naval Academy’s Cyber Boarda cyber advisory board of Advisors andBeazley PLC, as well as a director of Elbit Systems of America. He has served as an instructor and course developer at the National Cryptologic School within the NSA in Washington, D.C. and as an adjunct faculty member at the National Intelligence University in Washington, D.C. Mr. Ledgett is a member of the Risk Committee of the Board. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank.  Bank, and a member of its Executive and Risk Committees.

 

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Ledgett brings four decades of specialty expertise in the areas of intelligence, cyber securitycybersecurity and cyber operations. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the State University of the State of New York inat Albany New York and a Master of Science in Strategic Intelligence from the Defense Intelligence College.

 

14

 

9LOGO


NEWTON P.S. MERRILL

MELINDA R. RICH

Director since 2015

LOGO

 

Mr. Merrill, age 78, is a private investor with a distinguished five decade financial services career, including in executive positions at the Bank of BostonCompensation and The Bank of New York where he was the head of Private Client Services, Personal Trust, Asset Management and Private Banking businesses at his retirement in 2003.  He serves as Chairman of Mellon Optima L/S Strategy Fund LLC, as a director of National Integrity Life Insurance Co. in Cincinnati, Ohio, and as an Advisory BoardHuman Capital Committee Member and director of York Capital Management and related funds.  Mr. Merrill is a director of FT Crosby Education Foundation, Inc., a non-profit educational foundation.  He is a trustee and Chairman Emeritus of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, and a trustee and Chairman Emeritus of the Museum of the City of New York. Mr. Merrill is a director of M&T Bank and a member of its Trust and Investment Committee and an Advisory Member of the Trust and Investment Committee of Wilmington Trust, N.A.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Merrill has a wide range of banking and managerial experience with financial institutions and has considerable knowledge of investment banking and venture capital as well as private client services, asset management and fiduciary responsibility.  He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Engineering and Applied Physics from Harvard College.

MELINDA R. RICH

Director since 2009

 

Executive Committee Member

Director since

2009 

Ms. Rich, age 60,66, is the Chairman of Rich Holdings Inc, the holding company for international food company Rich Products Corporation and all Rich family business enterprises headquartered in Buffalo, New York. Prior to her appointment as Chairman in August 2022, Ms. Rich had served as Vice Chairman of Rich Products Corporation a privately owned global manufacturer and supplier of frozen foods headquartered in Buffalo, New York.since 2006. She is Chair of Rich Products Corporation’s Executive Committee and Governance Committee and a member of its Finance and Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, and a member of its ExecutiveOrganization Committee. Ms. Rich is Presidentalso Chairman of Rich Entertainment Group, which consists of various businesses in the sports, entertainment and restaurant industries. She is a directoralso serves as Chairman of Rich Holdings, Inc., as well as several other entities within the Rich Products Corporation family of companies. Ms. Rich is a director and member of the Compensation Committee of Weber Inc., a leading manufacturer of outdoor grills and related products, and a director of Grove Entertainment, a production company in New York City. She serves as an Advisor of BDT Capital Partners in Chicago, Illinois and as a trusteeDirector of the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio. Ms. Rich serves asis also a director of a number of charitable foundations, including Rich Family Foundation, DreamCatcher Foundation, Inc. and Cleveland Rock and Roll, Inc./Rock and& Roll Hall of Fame & Museum.Fame. She is a former director of Wm. Wrigley, Jr. Company. Ms. Rich is a member of the Executive and Compensation and Human Capital Committees of the Board. She is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank.  Bank, and a member of its Executive Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Rich brings considerable knowledge of executive compensation matters, leadership roles and service to civic and community organizations. She provides a valuable international perspective on public policy, societal and economic issues. Ms. Rich holds a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and Business from the University of Colorado. She received an Honorary DoctorateDoctor of Humane Letters from the Culinary Institute of America, an Honorary DoctorateDoctor of LawsLaw from D’Youville College and an Honorary Doctorate of Humane Letters from Canisius College.

 

10


ROBERT E. SADLER, JR.

Member of the

Risk CommitteeLOGO

 

ChairmanChair of the Executive Committee

Director since 1999

 

Chair of the Risk Committee

Director since

1999 

Mr. Sadler, age 72, was a consultant to M&T from 2010 to April 1, 2017.  He78, joined M&T Bank in 1983 and held a number of executive positions, including Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors from 2007 until his retirement in June 2010. From June 2005 to January 2007, Mr. Sadlerhe served as President and Chief Executive Officer of M&T and M&T Bank. He servesMr. Sadler served as a director of Delaware North Companies, Inc., a privately held global hospitality and food service company headquartered in Buffalo, New York.  Mr. Sadlerconsultant to M&T from 2010 to April 2017. He served as a director of Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROCK) from 2004 to 2015 and as a director of Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York until 2015. Mr. Sadler is Chair of the Executive and Risk Committees of the Board. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, Chairmanand Chair of its Executive Committee, and a member of its Risk Committee and its Trust and Investment Committee.Committees. In addition, Mr. Sadler is a memberChair of the Trust and Investment Committee of Wilmington Trust, N.A. and serves as the Chairman of the M&T Bank’s Directors Advisory Council–Florida Advisory Council of Wilmington Trust, N.A.Division.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Sadler brings in-depth knowledge of the financial services industry including significant financial experience and valuable corporate governance, risk management and institutional knowledge through his executive roles with M&T.knowledge. He holds a Bachelor of Arts from Washington and Lee University and a Master of Business Administration from Emory University.

 

 

LOGO

15


DENIS J. SALAMONE

Member

LOGO

Chair of the Audit Committee

 

Director since

2015

Mr. Salamone, age 64,70, joined M&T’sthe Board of Directors effective withupon the closing of M&T’s acquisition of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Hudson City Savings Bank (“Hudson City”) in November 2015. He served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hudson City from September 2014 until November 1, 2015. Mr. Salamone joined Hudson City in 2001 as Senior Executive Vice President and served on its Board of Directors. Between 2002 and 2014, he held several senior executive positions at Hudson City, including President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining Hudson City, Mr. Salamone was an accountant with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for 26 years, 16 years as a partner where he served as the Global Financial Services leader for Audit and Business Advisory Services. Mr. SalamoneHe is a member of the American Institute of CPAs and a member of the New York State Society of CPAs. HeMr. Salamone serves as Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees for St. Francis College in Brooklyn Heights, New York, as Chairman of the Board of Trusteesa trustee of the Ridgewood, New Jersey YMCA, as a trustee of the Valley Hospital in Ridgewood, New Jersey and as a trustee and Chair of Table to Tablethe Audit and Risk Committee of Valley Health System in Englewood Cliffs,Ridgewood, New Jersey. He is the Chair of the Audit Committee of the Board. Mr. Salamone is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, the Chair of its Examining Committee and a member of its ExaminingExecutive Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Salamone has more than 3540 years of experience in the financial services industry and brings significant accounting skills and knowledge of financial reporting and risk management. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from St. Francis College.

 

11


JOHN R. SCANNELL

RUDINA SESERI

LOGO

Trust and Investment Committee of M&T Bank Member

Director since

November 20172020 

Mr. Scannell,Ms. Seseri, age 54,46, is the ChairmanFounder and Managing Partner of Glasswing Ventures, LLC, an early-stage venture capital firm that invests in artificial intelligence and frontier technology companies that provide solutions in the Boardenterprise and Chief Executive Officercybersecurity markets. Prior to founding Glasswing Ventures in 2015, she was a partner at Fairhaven Capital, a technology venture capital firm, from 2010 to 2015 after serving as an associate since 2007. Ms. Seseri previously served as a Senior Manager in the Corporate Development Group at Microsoft Corporation, where she was responsible for leading acquisitions and investments in companies of Moog Inc. (NYSE: MOG.A), a worldwide manufacturer of control systemsstrategic importance, and components for aircraft, spacecraft, automated machinery and medical equipment.  Heas an investment banker in the Technology Group at Credit Suisse Group AG, leading public market transactions. She was appointed Vice Presidentby the Dean of Moog in 2005 and Chief Financial Officer in 2007.  In 1999, Mr. Scannell became the General Manager of Moog Ireland and joined the Aircraft Group in East Aurora, New York in 2003.  He joined Moog in 1990Harvard Business School as an Engineering Manager of Moog Ireland and later become Operations Manager of Moog GmbHExecutive Fellow in Germany.  Mr. Scannell is2022, having previously served as Entrepreneur in Residence in the Rock Center at Harvard Business School since 2013. Ms. Seseri serves as a director of Albany International Corp.MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (NYSE: AIN) where he servesMSM) and as a member of its Compensation Committee and of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. She also serves on the Compensation Committee.  Heboards of several private startup companies. Ms. Seseri is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Trust and Investment Committee. In addition, she is an advisory member of the Trust and Investment Committees of Wilmington Trust, N.A., a subsidiary of M&T, and Wilmington Trust Company, a subsidiary of M&T Bank.

 

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. ScannellMs. Seseri brings nearly 20 years of investing and transactional experience, including in building successful technology companies in innovative fields such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, enterprise software, and digital marketing technologies. She has significant businessknowledge in areas of technology, digital innovation, consumer solutions and management experience and valuable international business expertise.  Hestrategic planning. Ms. Seseri holds a Bachelor of Science and a Master of Science in Electrical EngineeringArts from the UniversityWellesley College at Cork, Ireland and a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School.

16

 

LOGO


KIRK W. WALTERS

 

LOGO

 

Trust and Investment Committee of M&T Bank Member

 

DAVID S. SCHARFSTEIN

Member of the Audit Committee

Director since 2017

2022 

Mr. Scharfstein,Walters, age 57, is68, previously served as Senior Executive Vice President of Corporate Development and Strategic Planning as well as a director of People’s United. He joined the Edmund Cogswell Converse ProfessorM&T Board upon the closing of Finance and Banking at Harvard Business School and Senior Associate Dean, Doctoral Programs at Harvard Business School.  From 1987 untilM&T’s acquisition of People’s United in April 2022. In addition, from 2011 to 2014, Mr. Walters served as Chief Financial Officer of People’s United. Prior to joining the Harvard Business School faculty in 2003,People’s United, he was a finance professor at the Massachusetts InstituteSenior Executive Vice President and a director of Technology Sloan School of Management.Santander Holdings USA, Inc. Previously Mr. ScharfsteinWalters held various senior executive positions with Chittenden Corporation from 1996 to 2008; Northeast Federal Corporation (including Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer) from 1989 to 1995; and CalFed, Inc. from 1984 to 1989. He began his career with Coopers & Lybrand and is a member of the Executive CommitteeCalifornia Society of the American Finance AssociationCPAs. Mr. Walters is also actively involved in several philanthropic activities among which are AngelFlight and a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research.ImproveCareNow. He served as President of the American Finance Association, as Senior Advisor to the U.S. Treasury Secretary from September 2009 to May 2010, and as a member of the Financial Advisory Roundtable of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.  Mr. Scharfstein is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its ExaminingTrust and Investment Committee. In addition, he is an advisory member of the Trust and Investment Committees of Wilmington Trust, N.A., a subsidiary of M&T, and Wilmington Trust Company, a subsidiary of M&T Bank.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Scharfstein is widely published on a broad range of topics in corporate financeWalters brings substantial banking and banking.financial services industry expertise. He provides diversity of viewpoint by virtue ofhas extensive executive and management experience gained through his academic background and brings valuable perspectives in the areas of finance, risk management and capital management.leadership roles at various financial institutions. Mr. ScharfsteinWalters holds a Bachelor of Arts from Princeton University and a Doctor of PhilosophyScience in EconomicsAccounting from the Massachusetts InstituteUniversity of Technology.Southern California.

 

12


HERBERT L. WASHINGTON

Member of the

LOGO

Audit Committee Member

Compensation and Human Capital Committee Member

Director since

1996

Mr. Washington, age 67, has been73, is President of H.L.W. Fast Track, Inc., a fast foodfast-food restaurant enterprise located in Youngstown, Ohio, which ownsowned and operates 23operated McDonald’s franchises in Ohio and Pennsylvania since 1980.  He was appointed as a directorfrom 1980 to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for a three-year term in 1993.  Mr. Washington served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Buffalo Branch Board from 1992 to 1993.2022. He is a director of the Youngstown Ohio Chamber of Commerce and of the Big Ten Athletic Advisory Committee. Mr. Washington iswas appointed as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for a three-year term in 1993. He served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Buffalo Branch Board from 1992 to 1993. Mr. Washington is a member of the Audit Committee and Compensation and Human Capital Committee of the Board. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Examining Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Washington brings extensive business acumen, valuable entrepreneurial skills as well as human capital, corporate governance and financial regulation experience. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Education from Michigan State University.

 

LOGO

 

17

13


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth M&T’s 2017 compensation structure for directors’ fees (for directors who are not salaried officers of M&T or its subsidiaries):

Elements of 2017 Directors’ Fees

Fees

Compensation

 

Annual Board Retainer

$

85,000

 

Board Attendance Fees – Per Meeting Attended

$

3,000

 

Committee Attendance Fees – Per Meeting Attended

$

3,000

 

Annual Audit Committee Chair Retainer

$

20,000

 

Annual Audit Committee (other than Chair) Retainer

$

10,000

 

Annual Risk Committee Chair Retainer

$

20,000

 

Annual Risk Committee (other than Chair) Retainer

$

10,000

 

Meetings with Regulators – Per Meeting Attended

$

3,000

 

Pursuant to the terms of the M&T Bank Corporation 2008 Directors’ Stock Plan (“Directors’ Stock Plan”), each director can elect to receive payment of his or her annual compensation in cash, in shares of M&T common stock, or in a combination of cash and shares of common stock for services as a director or advisory director of M&T and its subsidiaries.  Compensation is paid at the end of each calendar quarter in an amount equal to one quarter of a director’s annual retainer and the meeting fees earned during such quarter.  All directors are entitled to reimbursement for travel expenses incidental to their attendance at meetings.  The Board of Directors has determined that no fees (retainer, attendance or otherwise) will be paid to a director who is a salaried officer of M&T or any of its subsidiaries, or where such individual receives payment for services provided to M&T or any of its subsidiaries immediately after ceasing to be a salaried officer.

The following table sets forth the compensation of M&T’s directors in fiscal year 2017:

2017 Director Compensation

Name

Fees

Earned or

Paid in

Cash(1)

 

Stock

Awards(2)

 

All Other

Comp.

 

Total

 

Edward G. Amoroso

$

15,863

 

$

15,470

 

 

 

 

$

31,333

 

Brent D. Baird

$

229

 

$

201,021

 

 

 

 

$

201,250

 

C. Angela Bontempo

$

84,473

 

$

83,527

 

 

 

 

$

168,000

 

Robert T. Brady

$

77,424

 

$

76,576

 

 

 

 

$

154,000

 

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

$

93,226

 

$

92,774

 

 

 

 

$

186,000

 

Gary N. Geisel

$

103,984

 

$

103,216

 

 

 

 

$

207,200

 

Richard A. Grossi

$

82,965

 

$

82,235

 

 

 

 

$

165,200

 

John D. Hawke, Jr.

$

96,334

 

$

95,666

 

 

 

 

$

192,000

 

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

$

29,939

 

$

29,478

 

 

 

 

$

59,417

 

Newton P.S. Merrill

$

72,977

 

$

72,023

 

 

 

 

$

145,000

 

Melinda R. Rich

$

60,727

 

$

60,273

 

 

 

 

$

121,000

 

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.

$

71,391

 

$

70,859

 

$

50,000

 

$

192,250

 

Denis J. Salamone

$

73,626

 

$

72,874

 

 

 

 

$

146,500

 

John R. Scannell

$

14,633

 

$

14,534

 

 

 

 

$

29,167

 

David S. Scharfstein

$

55,310

 

$

54,940

 

 

 

 

$

110,250

 

Herbert L. Washington

$

79,419

 

$

78,581

 

 

 

 

$

158,000

 

(1)

The amounts listed in this column show only the amount of fees paid in cash, which is paid at the end of each calendar quarter.

14


(2)

The amounts listed in this column reflect fees paid in the form of M&T common stock, which is paid at the end of each calendar quarter.  The value of M&T common stock paid is based on the grant date fair value, which equals the value as of the last business day of each calendar quarter on which the shares of common stock are quoted on the NYSE.

(3)

Mr. Amoroso did not stand for reelection at the 2017 Annual Meeting; thus, the amounts shown represent only those fees earned during his service on the board.

(4)

Includes fees paid to directors for their service on M&T Bank Director Advisory Councils.

(5)

In accordance with the policy of the Board of Directors, any director who receives payments from M&T is not eligible to receive directors’ fees.  Mr. Sadler was a paid consultant to M&T until April 1, 2017 when the agreement was terminated.  The amounts shown represent the pro-rated compensation earned by Mr. Sadler in 2017 under the consulting arrangement with M&T as well as fees earned following termination of his consulting arrangement when he became eligible to receive directors’ retainers and fees, including for service on Wilmington Trust, N.A.’s Florida Advisory Council.

M&T Bank Corporation 2008 Directors’ Stock Plan

Pursuant to the terms of the Directors’ Stock Plan, each director can elect to receive payment of his or her annual compensation in cash, in shares of M&T common stock, or in a combination of cash and shares of M&T common stock for services as a director or advisory director of M&T and its subsidiaries.  The number of shares of M&T common stock paid is determined by dividing the amount of such compensation payable in shares of M&T common stock by the closing price of M&T’s common stock on the NYSE on the business day immediately preceding the day the compensation is payable.  Shares of M&T common stock received in payment of fees vest immediately upon grant.

M&T Bank Directors’ Fees

M&T directors, who also serve as directors of M&T Bank, if not salaried officers of M&T or its subsidiaries, receive attendance fees for each M&T Bank board, council or committee meeting attended, unless any such meeting is held concurrently with a meeting of the M&T board or committee, of which they are also a member.  Except as described below, such attendance fees and the cash versus stock allocations are identical to the schedule of fees paid to directors of M&T for board and committee meetings attended described above.

Mr. Baird, as a member of the Directors Advisory Council of the New York City/Long Island Division of M&T Bank, received an annual retainer of $15,000 and a fee of $1,750 for each meeting he attended.  Mr. Cunningham, as Chairman of the Directors Advisory Council of the Hudson Valley Division of M&T Bank, received a fee of $1,000 for each meeting he attended.  Mr. Geisel, as Chairman of the Directors Advisory Council of the Baltimore-Washington Division of M&T Bank, received a fee of $300 for each meeting he attended.  Mr. Grossi, as a member of the Directors Advisory Council of the Baltimore-Washington Division of M&T Bank, received a fee of $300 for each meeting he attended.  Effective April 1, 2017, Mr. Sadler, as Chairman of the Wilmington Trust, N.A. Florida Advisory Council, received a fee of $2,000 for each meeting he attended.  

15


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF M&T BANK CORPORATION

Corporate Governance Standards

M&T’sThe Board of Directors believes that the purpose ofis committed to sound and effective corporate governance isthat conforms to ensure that shareholder value is maximized in a manner that is consistent with legal requirements and the highest standards of business ethics and integrity.integrity, provides robust oversight of management and promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders. The Board has consistently adhered to corporate governance standards that the board believes promotes this purpose.  The Board initially adopted corporate governance practices in 1997 and adopted formal corporate governance standards in 2003.  Annually, the Boardannually evaluates its Corporate Governance Standards in light of best practices and regulatory guidance, its Corporate Governance Standards.

guidance. The Board last amended its Corporate Governance Standards in October 2017.  The current Corporate Governance Standards are available on M&T’s website at www.ir.mandtbank.com/corpgov.cfm.ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance. These standards address, among other things,items, director qualifications and responsibilities, board committees, director compensation and independence, director orientation and continuing education, annual performance evaluations, corporate disclosure policy, controlsdirector commitments and procedures regarding financial reportingconflicts of interest.

Board Composition, Diversity and disclosure,Refreshment

Our Corporate Governance Standards provide that the N&G Committee, in discharging its duties to review director nominee qualifications, consider experience, skill set, independence and codesdiversity in the context of Board needs and obligations. In light of these standards, the N&G Committee endeavors to identify nominees who possess diverse business conductexperiences, life skills, geographic representation and ethics.community involvement.

PursuantBoard Succession and Continuity Process. The Board, acting through the N&G Committee, reviews and considers new director candidates and existing members as part of its ongoing succession planning process for key Board and committee positions. The N&G Committee engages a third party, Ridgeway Partners, to M&T’s Amendedassist in this process, including with the identification and Restated Bylaws, in an uncontested election whenevaluation of potential future director nominees. Based on contributions and feedback from the N&G Committee, other directors, executive management and Ridgeway Partners, a quorum is represented, the affirmative vote of a majorityBoard framework and analysis of the votes cast with respectskills, experiences and attributes that M&T believes would be beneficial to suchhave represented on the Board and its committees have been developed. This process takes into account the current needs of the Board, future director nomineesuccession planning needs and M&T’s business strategy and industry trends. The importance of diversity in the composition of the Board has been a specific emphasis. The analysis of desired skills and attributes is required forleveraged throughout the process in identifying and evaluating Board candidates and considering committee assignments.

LOGO

18

LOGO


Diversity and Tenure. In identifying and recommending nominees to shareholders, our Board believes that its composition should also reflect gender, racial and other diversity. Since Mr. Jones became Chairman and CEO in late 2017, the percentage of diverse directors serving on the Board has increased from 19% to 41% of current directors and 44% of nominees at the Annual Meeting, which includes four women and three people of color. The Board also believes it is desirable to maintain a mix of experienced, longer-tenured directors who possess deep institutional knowledge along with newer directors who have different expertise, backgrounds and fresh perspectives. Over 40% of the director nominees have served on the Board for five years or less.

LOGO

LOGO

Board Size. We are asking our shareholders to vote for the election of 16 director nominees. The Board regularly evaluates its size and structure to provide effective oversight and best serve the needs of M&T and the interests of our shareholders and stakeholders. As a financial institution, M&T faces considerable and changing regulatory, risk management and economic demands that require a substantial commitment on the part of our directors. The size of our Board allows for an appropriate number of members to be designated to each committee with the skills, experience and time to provide proper and effective oversight. The diversity of viewpoints and skills on the Board and each committee also allows for an effective check and balance on proposals from management and directors. In addition, the number of independent directors aids in complying with the requisite independence standards of each Board committee.

Over-Boarding Policy. The Board also considers the availability of that nomineeeach candidate to fulfill his or her responsibilities as a director. IfBoth the Corporate Governance Standards and the N&G Committee Charter require that the Board, through the N&G Committee, review a director’s ability to continue to serve as a director of M&T if he or she wishes to join another public company board and would serve on three or more other public company boards after accepting the invitation. In the case of a director who is also an incumbentexecutive officer of a public company, the N&G Committee will conduct such review whenever the director wishes to join another public company board, regardless of the number of other boards on which he or she sits. Each year, the N&G Committee receives a report on and reviews the outside board commitments of all director nominees when considering whether to recommend such directors as nominees.

LOGO

19


Board Skills and Experience. The 16 director nominees represent a range of backgrounds, professions, skills, experiences and communities. The Board believes these complementary skills and experiences produce an effective and highly qualified Board. The skills and diversity characteristics below were self-identified by the directors as part of the company’s annual director questionnaire process.

Board Skills and Experience Matrix

LOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGO

SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE

CEO
Experience

Commercial
Banking

Wealth / Investment
Management

Customer Experience / Retail

Technology / Digital Innovation

Cybersecurity

Risk Management

Corporate Governance

Bank
Regulatory

Finance / Accounting

Human Capital Management

BOARD DEMOGRAPHICS

Gender
Diversity

(Female)

(Female)

(Female)

(Female)

Race/Ethnicity
Diversity

(Black)

(Black)

(Black)

20

LOGO


Board Independence

In February 2024, the Board conducted its annual director independence review. Based upon the recommendation of the N&G Committee, the Board determined that of the 16 nominees standing for election as directors at the 2024 Annual Meeting (each of whom currently serves as a director), 15 meet the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) standards for independence, as well as Mr. Scannell who is not standing for election. Mr. Jones is the only director and nominee not determined to be independent.

The Board applies the standards of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), NYSE and M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards to assist it in making independence determinations. The Board considers


LOGO

all relevant facts and circumstances in determining whether a material relationship exists with M&T. Material relationships that the Board may consider include commercial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, industrial, charitable and family relationships. As described below, the NYSE listing standards set forth specific relationships that will automatically bar independence.

NYSE “Bright-Line” Independence Tests. Under the NYSE “bright-line” tests, each of the following relationships will automatically bar a director from being independent:

A director is employed by M&T or an immediate family member is an executive officer of M&T;

A director’s (or immediate family member’s) receipt of more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from M&T (other than director fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service not contingent upon continued service, and other than compensation received by an immediate family member who is not an executive officer for service as an employee);

A director’s (or immediate family member’s) affiliation or employment with M&T’s internal or external auditors;

A director (or immediate family member) who has been an executive officer of another company where any executive officer of M&T serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or

A director employed by (or an immediate family member is an executive officer of) a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, M&T in an uncontested election does not receive the affirmative vote of a majorityamount in excess of the votes castgreater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

An employee-director of M&T (or a director with respectan immediate family member who is an M&T executive officer) will not be independent until three years after the employment relationship ends. The other bright-line tests will bar independence if they existed at any time during the prior three years. In addition, a director must be affirmatively determined by our Board to such director, that director is requiredhave no material relationship with M&T or its subsidiaries to tender his or her resignationbe considered independent.

In making its determination as to the independence of the directors, the Board of Directors.  considered specific transactions, relationships and arrangements with directors and their immediate family members and any such person’s business affiliations. Additionally, the Board considers ordinary course banking and financial services transactions provided by M&T and its subsidiaries in making its determination as to independence. See the section below titled “Transactions with Directors, Executive Officers and Certain Shareholders” for more information.

The Board, will then determine whether or not to accept such resignation, taking into accountupon the recommendation of the NCGN&G Committee, considered relevant facts and circumstances consistent with the applicable independence standards. Based on its review, the Board affirmatively determined that, other than Mr. Jones, each member of the Board is “independent” and does not have any material relationships with M&T or its subsidiaries.

LOGO

21


Board Leadership Structure

Chairman. Mr. Jones was elected as M&T’s Chairman of the Board and appointed Chief Executive Officer in December 2017. Mr. Jones has been an employee of M&T for more than 30 years and has been a member of executive management for over 18 years. The Board believes that in light of Mr. Jones’ significant broad-based experience with M&T and his leadership tenure with the organization, his service as Chairman continues to be appropriate for the Board as it fosters effective decision making and clear accountability.

Lead Independent Director. The Board adheres to M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards and annually elects a non-executive Vice Chairman of the Board who performs the duties of lead independent director. Mr. Brady has served as the lead independent director since 2015. As lead independent director, Mr. Brady presides over the executive sessions of the non-management directors. Mr. Brady also currently serves as the Chair of the N&G Committee, which oversees the efforts of M&T and the Board to maintain effective corporate governance practices and Board composition.

Executive Sessions of the Non-Management Directors. The non-management directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. Mr. Brady, Vice Chairman of the Board and the lead independent director, presides at these meetings. In the absence of the lead independent director, the non-management directors determine which director will preside at such meetings.

Board Self-Evaluation Process

The N&G Committee oversees an annual self-evaluation of the Board. Prior to the beginning of the Board’s self-evaluation each year, the N&G Committee considers possible enhancements to the process, including changes to the evaluation format and the written questionnaire. The written questionnaire, which is provided to each director, covers a range of topics related to Board effectiveness and performance, including questions on Board composition, culture, committee performance, risk management, oversight of corporate strategy, management accountability, and agenda and meeting effectiveness.

After completion of the written questionnaire, the full Board, led by the Chair of the N&G Committee, reviews the results and holds a self-evaluation discussion. Any points of attention or changes to Board practices are identified, and the Chair of the N&G Committee has the opportunity to meet with the Chief Legal Officer or others as necessary to discuss any such follow-up items. Later in the year, the lead independent director also leads a discussion on Board effectiveness and solicits further feedback during an executive session of the non-management directors. In addition to this formal Board self-evaluation process, directors are encouraged to provide feedback at any point during the year. Board committees also perform their own self-evaluation process as required in their respective charters.

Board Continuing Education and Orientation

The Board, through discussions with management and requests throughout the year, identifies areas of focus for director education and development. As a result, educational topics are planned throughout the year and presented at meetings of the Board and committees on a regular basis. The presentations are provided by both internal specialists and outside advisors on a range of topics to enhance directors’ knowledge of areas important to their ability to carry out Board and committee responsibilities. Directors are also encouraged to pursue outside learning opportunities and offered membership by M&T in a leading national director education association.

Newly elected directors participate in the company’s director orientation program. The director orientation program aims to acquaint newly elected directors with M&T’s business, culture and governance framework. Members of executive leadership, including heads of business lines and departments, participate in a detailed live orientation session with new directors, reviewing the company’s culture and values, business structure, strategic objectives and planning, risk management matters, corporate governance program, internal audit services and compliance programs, and policies applicable to directors, among other topics.

22

LOGO


Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Risk Committee assists the Board in its oversight of risk management functions. Management has established the Enterprise Risk Framework (“Risk Framework”) through which M&T identifies, assesses, monitors, controls, communicates, and escalates risk in a manner designed to ensure the Risk Committee is provided the transparency necessary to be effective in its oversight responsibilities.

The Risk Framework, which is reviewed and approved by the Risk Committee at least annually, represents M&T’s overall risk management approach, including the policies, processes, controls, and systems, through which the company seeks to manage risk. It provides a common foundation for all employees and officers as well as directors to understand and communicate the types of risks that M&T faces in pursuit of its business objectives.

M&T’s Risk Framework includes the following critical elements:

• The Risk Appetite Statement, which articulates, in written form, the types of risks that M&T is willing to accept and those that M&T seeks to avoid in pursuit of its business objectives. It affirms the principles by which M&T identifies itself, while providing a central guide for decision making processes.

• The “Three Lines of Defense” Control Structure, which is intended to clarify roles, responsibilities and accountabilities for decision making, risk taking and control across M&T. The Second and Third Lines of Defense provide independent oversight to help ensure thorough and effective identification, assessment, monitoring, and mitigation of risks.

• Risk Governance Committee oversight through a multi-tiered structure responsible for overseeing proactive risk identification, developing an aggregated view of risks, and providing a consistent governance methodology across M&T. The Risk Governance Committees are management committees predominately chaired by members of our Independent Risk Management teams, and membership spans employees from all three Lines of Defense. All such committees report up to the Management Risk Committee, which is chaired by the Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”), and serves as the executive level committee responsible for the implementation and oversight of the Risk Framework.

• Clearly defined roles and responsibilities through the establishment of Risk Management policies and procedures.

• Risk Reporting, which provides a sustainable mechanism designed to ensure that the Management Risk Committee and the Risk Committee are notified of all material risks and provided an independent assessment of M&T’s activities by the Second Line of Defense.

In addition to the Risk Committee, the Audit Committee plays a key role in risk management oversight through the validation and oversight of our internal controls, policies and procedures to help ensure their effectiveness, as described further below in the description of the Audit Committee. Our C&HC Committee also provides oversight of risks associated with M&T’s compensation programs, as described in more detail under “Incentive Compensation Governance” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement.

At each Board meeting, the Board receives a report from the Chair of the Risk Committee and the CRO. Further, the CRO provides reports directly to the Risk Committee at each of its meetings as well as at least twice per year to the Audit Committee and at least annually to the C&HC Committee. The Board will publicly disclose,also regularly receives reports from the Chair of the Audit Committee. During 2023, the Risk Committee held 17 meetings, including two joint meetings with the Audit Committee.

LOGO

23


Oversight of Sustainability and ESG Matters

Board Oversight. The Board is committed to effective oversight of sustainability and environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters. The Board maintains such oversight through its committee structure.

N&G Committee: The N&G Committee serves as a resource to the Board on corporate governance, sustainability and ESG matters and oversees the company’s overall sustainability and ESG strategy and policies;

Risk Committee: The Risk Committee is responsible for oversight of M&T’s Risk Framework, which includes the oversight of climate risk;

C&HC Committee: The C&HC Committee reviews M&T’s human capital and talent management strategies, including employee diversity, equity and inclusion, well-being and engagement, and recruitment, development and retention; and

Audit Committee: The Audit Committee discusses key ESG and sustainability-related disclosures, including internal procedures and controls related to such disclosures.

Management Governance Structure. Board oversight is supported by a management governance structure which includes our Sustainability Committee. The Sustainability Committee oversees M&T’s sustainability and ESG management framework, including the strategies, objectives, disclosures, goals and targets, communications, and policies established across the company to identify, measure, monitor, control, respond to, report on, and execute on ESG risks and opportunities. The Sustainability Committee is comprised of key executive leaders and reports to the N&G Committee. In addition, we have established a Sustainability Working Group and Climate Steering Committee comprised of senior leaders from across M&T to provide feedback, guidance and promote alignment and effectiveness of sustainability initiatives and the enterprise-wide climate program, respectively.

Climate risk is integrated into our Risk Framework with oversight from the Risk Committee. The Climate Risk Working Group was established by M&T’s senior-level Operational Risk Committee to aid in a press releasethe governance and review of oversight of climate risk and is comprised of employees across the company who monitor for climate risks.

M&T provides more information regarding its sustainability and ESG program, priorities and progress in its annual Sustainability Report, which can be found on M&T’s Investor Relations website at ir.mtb.com.

24

LOGO


Board Committees

Board and Committee Membership

(as of March 1, 2024)

Director

AuditCompensation and
Human Capital
ExecutiveNomination
and Governance
Risk

John P. Barnes(1)

Robert T. Brady(2)

Chair

Carlton J. Charles

Jane Chwick(1)

William F. Cruger, Jr.(3)

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

Gary N. Geisel

Chair

Leslie V. Godridge(1)

René F. Jones(4)

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

Melinda R. Rich

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.(1)

ChairChair

Denis J. Salamone(3)

Chair

John R. Scannell

Rudina Seseri

Kirk W. Walters

Herbert L. Washington

(1)

Designated as a “risk management expert” under Regulation YY of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

(2)

Mr. Brady also serves as the non-executive Vice Chairman of the Board who performs the duties of lead independent director.

(3)

Determined to be an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.

(4)

Mr. Jones serves as the Chairman of the Board.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee has the authority and responsibility to engage and discharge the independent registered public accounting firm, pre-approve all audit and non-audit services to be provided by such firm, review the plan and results of the auditing engagement, review management’s evaluation of the adequacy of M&T’s system of internal controls over financial reporting, direct and supervise investigations into matters within the scope of its duties, and perform the duties set forth in its written charter and such other duties as are required by applicable laws or SEC filing, its decision to accept or reject such resignation within 90 days afterrules. The Audit Committee also approves the certificationcompensation of M&T’s Chief Auditor. In addition, the Audit Committee serves as the Examining Committee for M&T Bank and Wilmington Trust, N.A. The members of the election results.Audit Committee are Messrs. Cruger, Cunningham, Salamone (Chair) and Washington, each of whom served on the Committee throughout 2023. The Audit Committee held 14 meetings in 2023, including two joint meetings with the Risk Committee.

AvailabilityThe Audit Committee is comprised solely of Corporate Governance Standards

directors who are not officers or employees of M&T and who the Board has determined have the requisite financial literacy to serve on the Audit Committee. The Board determined that no member of the Audit Committee has any material relationship with M&T that might interfere with the exercise of the member’s independent judgment and that each member meets the standards of independence established by the SEC and the NYSE. In addition, to beingthe Board has determined that at least one member of the Audit Committee meets the NYSE standard of having “accounting or related financial management expertise.” The Board, based upon the recommendation of the N&G Committee, after reviewing all relevant facts and circumstances, has determined that Mr. Cruger and Mr. Salamone each is an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.

LOGO

25


The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board. The Audit Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at www.ir.mandtbank.com/corpgov.cfm, any shareholder can request copiesir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

Compensation and Human Capital (C&HC) Committee

The C&HC Committee, in accordance with its charter, is responsible for discharging the responsibilities of the Board relating to the compensation of M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards,executive officers as well as administering M&T’s equity compensation plans and awarding grants thereunder. The C&HC Committee is also responsible for oversight of M&T’s human capital and talent management strategies, including strategies related to employee diversity, equity and inclusion, well-being, engagement, recruitment, development and retention.

The C&HC Committee recommends to the chartersBoard the compensation and benefits of directors and reviews and approves the compensation and benefits of executive officers of M&T. The C&HC Committee is also responsible for reviewing with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) and providing a report recommending to the Board whether such CD&A should be included in the proxy statement.

The members of the C&HC Committee are Mr. Geisel (Chair), Ms. Rich and Mr. Washington, each of whom served on the Audit Committee Riskthroughout 2023. The C&HC Committee Nomination, Compensationheld seven meetings in 2023, including one joint meeting with the N&G Committee.

The C&HC Committee is comprised solely of directors who are not officers or employees of M&T. The Board determined that no member of the C&HC Committee has any material relationship with M&T that might interfere with the exercise of the member’s independent judgment and Governancethat each member meets the standards of independence established by the SEC and the NYSE, including for compensation committees.

The C&HC Committee oris governed by a written charter approved by the Board. The C&HC Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

Executive Committee

The Board has empowered its Executive Committee to act when the Board is not in session, during which time the Executive Committee possesses all of the Board’s powers in the management of the business and affairs of M&T, except as well as our Codeotherwise limited by law. The members of Business Conductthe Executive Committee are Mr. Brady, Mr. Geisel, Mr. Jones, Ms. Rich and Ethics, and our CodeMr. Sadler (Chair), each of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers.  To make a request, shareholders may either mail their request towhom served on the Committee throughout 2023. The Executive Committee held seven meetings in 2023. The Executive Committee of M&T meets jointly with the Executive Committee of M&T Bank, Corporation, Attention:  Shareholder Relations,which includes Messrs. Ledgett and Salamone as rotating members, in addition to Mr. Brady, Mr. Geisel, Mr. Jones, Ms. Rich and Mr. Sadler (Chair).

The Executive Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board. The Executive Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

Nomination and Governance (N&G) Committee

The N&G Committee is responsible for evaluating and overseeing the efforts of M&T and of the Board to maintain effective corporate governance practices and identifying candidates for election to the Board. In addition, the N&G Committee is responsible for reviewing M&T’s strategy and policies relating to sustainability and ESG matters, including engagement with shareholders and other stakeholders.

The members of the N&G Committee are Messrs. Brady (Chair), Charles and Scannell, each of whom served on the Committee in 2023. Mr. Charles joined the N&G Committee upon his election to the Board in January 2023. The N&G Committee held six meetings in 2023, including one joint meeting with the C&HC Committee.

26

LOGO


The N&G Committee considers nominees for director who are recommended by various persons or entities, including, but not limited to, non-management directors, the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of M&T, and shareholders. As explained above under “Board Composition, Diversity and Refreshment,” in evaluating all nominees for director, including those recommended by shareholders, the N&G Committee reviews the qualifications and independence of the potential nominee in light of the composition of the current Board and its various committees. This assessment includes, among other considerations, the potential nominee’s diversity, qualification as independent, skills, experience, tenure, contribution and appropriate geographic balance in the context of the needs of the Board and its committees. The N&G Committee has engaged Ridgeway Partners to assist with identification and evaluation of potential future director nominees.

The N&G Committee will consider candidates nominated by shareholders who are properly submitted in writing to M&T’s Corporate Secretary at One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203 and received no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which M&T first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders. For the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, M&T’s Corporate Secretary must receive those nominations no earlier than October 6, 2024 and no later than November 5, 2024.

The N&G Committee is comprised solely of directors who are not officers or sendemployees of M&T. The Board determined that no member of the N&G Committee has any material relationship with M&T that might interfere with the exercise of the member’s independent judgment and that each member meets the standards of independence established by the SEC and the NYSE.

The N&G Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board. The N&G Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

Risk Committee

The Risk Committee assists the Board in its oversight of M&T’s risk management function, including the strategies, policies, procedures and systems established by management to identify, assess, measure and manage the major risks facing M&T. In discharging its duties of risk oversight, the Risk Committee provides input to management on risk appetite, risk profile and regulatory requirements and assesses the effectiveness of M&T’s risk management framework. See “Board’s Role in Risk Oversight” above for more information about the Risk Committee’s role in assisting the Board in its oversight of risk management functions.

The members of the Risk Committee are Mr. Barnes, Ms. Chwick. Ms. Godridge, Mr. Ledgett and Mr. Sadler (Chair), each of whom served on the Committee throughout 2023. The Risk Committee held 17 meetings in 2023, including two joint meetings with the Audit Committee.

Regulation YY promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”), requires that publicly traded bank holding companies such requestas M&T must maintain a risk committee chaired by an independent director and include at least one member meeting the FRB standards of experience in identifying, assessing and managing risk exposures of large, complex financial firms commensurate with the company’s structure, risk profile complexity, activities and size (a “risk management expert”). The Board, based upon the recommendation of the N&G Committee, after reviewing all relevant facts and circumstances, determined that Mr. Barnes, Ms. Chwick, Ms. Godridge and Mr. Sadler each is a “risk management expert.”

The Risk Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board. The Risk Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

LOGO

27


Board and Committee Attendance

The Board held 10 meetings in 2023. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings held by committees on which the director served. The average attendance of directors at Board and board committee meetings held in 2023 was approximately 96%.

96%

Average attendance of directors at Board and committee meetings in 2023

M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards encourage all members of the Board to Shareholder Relations via electronic mail at ir@mtb.com.attend its Annual Meeting of Shareholders, absent exigent circumstances. All directors attended the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which was held virtually.

Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics

M&T makes its policies and procedures available to all of our employees.  These policies include our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.  Further,Ethics available to all employees. M&T requires all employees to annually certify that they have read and are familiar with the employee policies and procedures and their content, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and that they will adhere to such policies and procedures.

16


M&T’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to our directors, officers, advisors and employees, as well as to our agents and representatives, including consultants. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires that individuals avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws and other legal requirements, conduct business in an honest and ethical manner, and otherwise act with integrity and in the best interests of M&T. In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics expects individuals to report any observed illegal or unethical behavior and provides a retaliation-free reporting mechanism. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is a guide to help ensure that all individuals live up to the highest ethical standards.

M&T also maintains a Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and allany other senior financial officers designated by the Chief Financial Officer from time to time. This Code of Ethics supplements our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and is intended to promote honest and ethical conduct, full and accurate financial reporting and compliance with laws, as well as other matters.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers isare available on M&T’s website at www.ir.mandtbank.com/corpgov.cfm.

ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.In accordance with SEC rules, M&T will post on its website or file a Form 8-K to report any amendment to or waiver from any provision in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller, or persons performing similar functions.

Board Diversity

M&T strives to foster an inclusive workplace environment that respects and values individual differences.  We believe that employee diversity enhances the organization’s ability to innovate, and therefore to maintain a competitive advantage.  Likewise, M&T values diversity among its board members for these same reasons.  Our Corporate Governance Standards provide that the NCG Committee, in discharging its duties of reviewing the qualifications of director nominees, considers, among other factors, diversity, age, skills and experience in the context of the needs of the Board of Directors and regulatory obligations and guidance.  In light of these guidelines, the NCG Committee endeavors to appoint a slate of nominees that represents diversity with respect to educational background, business experience, life skills, geographic representation and community involvement, as well as gender, race and national origin.  The NCG Committee does not assign specific weight to any particular criteria; its goal is to identify nominees that, considered as a group, will possess the talents, skill sets and characteristics necessary for the Board of Directors to fulfill its responsibilities.

Board Independence

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Standards, the Board conducts an annual review of director independence.  As a result of the review performed in April 2017, the Board determined, based upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, that 12 of the 14 members then serving as directors met the NYSE standard for independence.  In February 2018, the Board conducted its annual director independence review and, based upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, determined that of the 17 nominees standing for election as directors at the Annual Meeting, all of whom are currently serving as such, 14 meet the NYSE standard for independence.  Currently, only Messrs. Jones, Gold and Sadler are not deemed to be independent.  

17In addition to being available on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance, any shareholder can request copies of M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards, the charters for each of the Audit Committee, C&HC Committee, Executive Committee, N&G Committee or Risk Committee, as well as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and our Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers. To make a request, shareholders may either mail their request to M&T Bank Corporation, Attention: Shareholder Relations, One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203, or send such request to Shareholder Relations via electronic mail at ir@mtb.com.


The Board applies the standards of the SEC, NYSE and M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards to assist it in making independence determinations.  The Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances in determining whether a material relationship exists with M&T. Material relationships that the Board may consider include commercial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, industrial, charitable and family relationships.  The NYSE rules set forth specific relationship that will always bar independence.  Under the NYSE “bright-line” tests, each of the following relationships will automatically bar a director from being independent:  

A director employed by M&T;

A director’s receipt of more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from M&T (other than director fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service not contingent upon continued service);

A director’s affiliation or employment with M&T’s internal or external auditors;

A director (or immediate family member) who has been an executive officer of another company where any executive officer of M&T serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or

A director employed by (or an immediate family member is an executive officer of) a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, M&T in an amount in excess of the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

An employee-director of M&T (or a director with an immediate family member who is an M&T executive officer) will not be independent until three years after the employment relationship ends.  The other bright-line tests will bar independence if they existed at any time during the prior three years.  

In making its determination as to the independence of the directors, the Board considered specific transactions, relationships and arrangements with directors and their immediate family members and any such person’s business affiliations.  For each of Mr. Hawke and Ms. Rich, payments by M&T to a company (in the case of Ms. Rich, a director-affiliated travel agency and, in the case of Mr. Hawke, the international law firm from which he is a retired partner and now an employee and does not share in the profits of the firm) for services in an amount that did not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of such company’s consolidated gross revenues.  The Board determined that neither Mr. Hawke nor Ms. Rich have a direct or indirect material interest in the transactions with the entities that M&T engaged for professional and transactional services.  Additionally, the Board considers ordinary course banking and financial services transactions provided by M&T and its subsidiaries as generally described in the section titled “TRANSACTIONS WITH DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS,” in making its determination as to independence.  

The Board, upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, considered all relevant facts and circumstances, including these transactions, relationships and arrangements and, consistent with the applicable independence standards, determined that none impair the relevant director’s independence as a director of M&T or as a member of any of the committees on which he or she serves. Based on its review of all relevant information, the Board affirmatively determined that, other than Messrs. Jones, Gold and Sadler, who do not meet the NYSE bright-line independence standards, each member of the Board of Directors is “independent” and does not have any material relationships with M&T or its subsidiaries.  

18


Board Leadership Structure

Chairman and Lead Independent Director

Mr. Jones was elected as M&T’s Chairman of the Board and appointed Chief Executive Officer on December 20, 2017, following the death of Robert G. Wilmers who had held those posts for more than 30 years.  Mr. Jones has been an employee of M&T for over 25 years and has been a member of executive management for 13 years.  The Board believes that in light of Mr. Jones’ significant broad-based experience with M&T, his leadership tenure with the organization, and his close working relationship with Mr. Wilmers, that the same leadership structure is appropriate for the Board of Directors as it fosters effective decision-making and clear accountability.  The Board adheres to the Corporate Governance Standards on this topic and annually elects a non-executive Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors who performs the duties of lead independent director.  Mr. Brady has served as the lead independent director since June 2015.  The lead independent director presides over the executive sessions of the non-management directors.

Executive Sessions of the Non-Management Directors

The non-management directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.  Mr. Brady, Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and the lead independent director, presides at these meetings.  In the absence of the lead independent director, the non-management directors determine which director will preside at such meetings.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors has delegated its risk oversight duties to the Risk Committee.  At each Board meeting, the Board receives separate reports from the Chairman of the Risk Committee as well as the Chair of the Audit Committee.  In 2017, the Audit Committee and the Risk Committee held one joint meeting.  M&T’s risk governance committees, including the Management Risk Committee, which is the primary management-level risk committee, provide regular reports to the Risk Committee.  Further, M&T’s Chief Risk Officer provides regular reports directly to the Risk Committee and twice per year to the Audit Committee.

Board Attendance

The Board of Directors held 15 meetings in 2017.  Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and each committee on which the director served.

M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards encourage all members of the Board of Directors to attend its Annual Meeting of Shareholders, absent exigent circumstances.  Of the nominees standing for election at the Annual Meeting, 14 were elected at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and each of those directors attended that meeting, except for Mr. Salamone, who had a death in his family.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Any shareholder or other interested party wishing to communicate with the Board of Directors or any individual director may submit his or her written correspondence to M&T Bank Corporation’s Corporate

28

LOGO


Secretary, One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203. The Corporate Secretary may facilitate direct communicationswill provide the communication, or prepare a summary of the communication, to the appropriate member(s) of the Board, unless, in the lead independentjudgment of the Corporate Secretary, the matter is not intended or appropriate for the Board.

Majority Voting Standard for Director Elections

Pursuant to M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, in an uncontested election when a quorum is represented, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to a director nominee is required for the non-management directorselection of that nominee as a group, or individual directors, by reviewing and summarizing such communications.

19


Board Committees and Member Composition During 2017

Committee Member

Audit

Executive

Nomination,

Compensation

and Governance

Risk

Brent D. Baird(1)

Chairman

C. Angela Bontempo

Chair

Financial Expert

Robert T. Brady(1)

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

Risk Management

Expert

Gary N. Geisel

Risk Management

Expert

Richard S. Gold(2)

Richard A. Grossi

Financial Expert

John D. Hawke, Jr.

Chairman

René F. Jones(1)

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

Newton P.S. Merrill

Melinda R. Rich

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.(1)

Chairman

Denis J. Salamone

John R. Scannell

David S. Scharfstein

Herbert L. Washington

Robert G. Wilmers(1)(3)

Chairman

(1)

On December 20, 2017, Mr. Jones was elected to the Board of Directors and the Executive Committee was reconstituted.  Messrs. Baird, Brady, Jones and Sadler were appointed as the members of the Executive Committee.  Mr. Sadler was appointed Chairman of the Executive Committee to succeed Mr. Wilmers.

(2)

Mr. Gold was elected to the Board of Directors on December 20, 2017.

(3)

Mr. Wilmers passed away on December 16, 2017.  He served as Chairman of the Executive Committee until his death.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee hasdirector. If an incumbent director in an uncontested election does not receive the authority and responsibility to engage and discharge the independent registered public accounting firm, pre-approve all audit and non-audit services to be provided by such firm, review the plan and resultsaffirmative vote of a majority of the auditing engagement, review management’s evaluationvotes cast, that director would still be elected, but would be required to tender his or her resignation to the Board. The independent members of the adequacy of M&T’s system of internal controls over financial reporting, direct and supervise investigationsBoard would then determine whether or not to accept such resignation, taking into matters withinaccount the scope of its duties, and perform the duties set forth in its written charter and such other duties as are required by applicable laws or securities exchange rules.  In addition, the Audit Committee serves as the Examining Committee for Wilmington Trust, N.A. and reviews the activitiesrecommendation of the ExaminingN&G Committee. The Board will publicly disclose, in a press release or SEC filing, its decision to accept or reject such resignation within 90 days after the certification of the election results.

Compensation and Human Capital Committee of M&T Bank.Interlocks and Insider Participation

Mr. Geisel, Ms. Bontempo (Chair)Rich and Messrs. Grossi, Salamone, Scharfstein andMr. Washington served as members of the AuditC&HC Committee during 2017, and each currently serves as a member.  The Audit Committee held six meetings in 2017, including one joint meeting with the Risk Committee.

The Audit Committee is comprised solely of directors who are not officers or employees of M&T and who the Board has determined have the requisite financial literacy to serve on the Audit Committee.  The Board determined that no member of the Audit Committee has any material relationship with M&T that might interfere with the exercise of the member’s independent judgment and that each member meets the standards of independence established by the SEC and the NYSE.  In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that at least one member of the Audit Committee meets the NYSE standard of having “accounting or related financial management expertise.”  The Board, based upon the

20


recommendation of the NCG Committee, after reviewing all relevant facts and circumstances, determined that Ms. Bontempo and Mr. Grossi each is an “audit committee financial expert.”  

The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board of Directors.  The Audit Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at www.ir.mandtbank.com/corpgov.cfm.

Executive Committee

The Board of Directors has empowered its Executive Committee to act when the Board of Directors is not in session, during which time the Executive Committee possesses all of the Board’s powers in the management of the business and affairs of M&T Bank Corporation, except as otherwise limited by law.  Messrs. Wilmers (Chairman), Baird and Brady served as members of the Executive Committee during 2017.  On December 20, 2017, following the death of Mr. Wilmers, the Board of Directors reconstituted the Executive Committee and Messrs. Sadler (Chairman), Baird, Brady and Jones were appointed as the members of the Executive Committee, and each currently serves as a member.  The Executive Committee did not meet in 2017.  

The Executive Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board of Directors.  The Executive Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at www.ir.mandtbank.com/corpgov.cfm.

Nomination, Compensation and Governance Committee

The Nomination, Compensation and Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating the efforts of M&T and of the Board of Directors to maintain effective corporate governance practices and identifying candidates for election to the Board of Directors.  In addition, the NCG Committee is responsible for administering M&T’s equity compensation plans and awarding grants thereunder.  It administers various equity and incentive plans, including the M&T Bank Corporation Annual Executive Incentive Plan, the M&T Bank Corporation 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan, the Directors’ Stock Plan, the M&T Bank Corporation 2009 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (“Equity Incentive Compensation Plan”) and the M&T Bank Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  The NCG Committee recommends the remuneration and benefits of directors and Section 16 reporting officers of M&T and its subsidiaries.  It is also responsible for reviewing with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) and providing a report recommending to the Board of Directors whether such CD&A should be included in the proxy statement.  Messrs. Baird (Chairman), Brady and Geisel served as members of the NCG Committee throughout 2017, and each currently serves as a member.  The NCG Committee held eight meetings in 2017.

The NCG Committee considers nominees for director that are recommended by various persons or entities, including, but not limited to, non-management directors, the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of M&T, and shareholders.  In evaluating all nominees for director, including those recommended by shareholders, the NCG Committee considers whether each nominee has all the requisite experience, attributes and qualifications for board membership and not just certain specific qualities or skills. In addition, the NCG Committee takes into account any contractual rights that persons or entities have with respect to nominees for director.  

In considering nominees for director, including those recommended by shareholders, the NCG Committee reviews the qualifications and independence of the potential nominee in light of the composition of the current Board of Directors and its various committees.  This assessment includes, among other considerations, the potential nominee’s qualification as independent, diversity, age, skills,

21


experience, tenure, contribution and appropriate geographic balance in the context of the needs of the Board of Directors and its committees.

The NCG Committee will consider candidates nominated by shareholders that are properly submitted in writing to M&T’s Corporate Secretary at One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203 and received no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which M&T first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  For the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, M&T’s Corporate Secretary must receive those nominations on or before November 7, 2018.

The NCG Committee is comprised solely of directors who are not officers or employees of M&T.  The Board determined that no member of the NCG Committee has any material relationship with M&T that might interfere with the exercise of the member’s independent judgment and that each member meets the standards of independence established by the SEC and the NYSE.

The NCG Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board of Directors.  The NCG Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at www.ir.mandtbank.com/corpgov.cfm.

Risk Committee

The Risk Committee assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of M&T’s risk management function, including the strategies, policies, procedures and systems established by management to identify, assess, measure and manage the major risks facing M&T.  In discharging its duties of risk oversight, the Risk Committee provides input to management on risk appetite, risk profile and regulatory requirements and approves the effectiveness of M&T’s risk management framework.  Messrs. Hawke (Chairman), Cunningham, Geisel and Sadler served as members of the Risk Committee throughout 2017, and each currently serves as a member.  The Risk Committee held 13 meetings in 2017, including one joint meeting with the Audit Committee.

Regulation YY promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) in February 2014, requires that publicly traded bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more must maintain a risk committee chaired by an independent director and by January 1, 2015, include at least one member meeting the FRB standards of experience in identifying, assessing and managing risk exposures of large, complex financial firms commensurate with the company’s structure, risk profile complexity, activities and size (a “risk management expert”). The Board, based upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, after reviewing all relevant facts and circumstances, determined that Messrs. Cunningham and Geisel each is a “risk management expert.”  

The Risk Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board of Directors.  The Risk Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at www.ir.mandtbank.com/corpgov.cfm.

22


NOMINATION, COMPENSATION AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Messrs. Baird (Chairman), Brady and Geisel served as members of the NCG Committee throughout 2017,2023, and each currently serves as a member. No individual who served as a member of the NCGC&HC Committee during 20172023 was at any time or formerly an officer or employee of M&T or any of its subsidiaries. During 2023, none of M&T’s executive officers served as a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the C&HC Committee, and none of M&T’s executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a member of M&T’s Board or on the C&HC Committee.

The Board of Directors determined that all members of the NCGC&HC Committee are independent and have no financial or personal relationships with M&T requiring disclosure pursuant to the SEC rules (other than director compensation, equity ownership and transactions made in the ordinary course of business with its banking or other operating subsidiaries as described in this proxy statement).

 

LOGO

29


Director Compensation

The compensation program for our non-employee directors aims to compensate directors in a competitive range compared to peer financial institutions, commensurate with the significant amount of time, effort and expertise required to fulfill director duties. The program also aims to align the interests of our directors with M&T’s shareholders through the award of an annual Board equity retainer.

The director compensation structure provides annual compensation to directors approximately 50 percent in equity and 50 percent in cash (depending upon committee participation) through an annual Board equity retainer and an annual Board cash retainer, as well as annual committee cash retainers for service on Board committees. There are no per meeting fees.

Equity Award. The annual Board equity retainer component is granted in the form of restricted stock units having a grant date fair value of $130,000 for the lead independent director and of $120,000 for each other non-employee director. For 2023, the restricted stock units were awarded in April 2023, vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date, and have such other terms as provided in a Directors’ Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement and under the M&T Bank Corporation 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated (the “2019 Equity Plan”).

Cash Fees. Under the annual Board cash retainer component, a cash retainer of $100,000 is paid to the lead independent director and a cash retainer of $90,000 is paid to each other non-employee director.

Committee Fees. The following annual cash retainers are also paid to the members of the committees of the Board:

An annual cash retainer of $40,000 is paid to the Chair of the Audit Committee, and an annual cash retainer of $20,000 is paid to each other member of the Audit Committee.

An annual cash retainer of $25,000 is paid to the Chair of the C&HC Committee and an annual cash retainer of $15,000 is paid to each other member of the C&HC Committee.

An annual cash retainer of $25,000 is paid to the Chair of the Executive Committee, and an annual cash retainer of $15,000 is paid to each other member of the Executive Committee (including directors who serve on the Executive Committee of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank).

An annual cash retainer of $25,000 is paid to the Chair of the N&G Committee and an annual cash retainer of $15,000 is paid to each other member of the N&G Committee.

An annual cash retainer of $40,000 is paid to the Chair of the Risk Committee and an annual cash retainer of $25,000 is paid to each other member of the Risk Committee.

In addition, directors who also serve as members of M&T Bank’s Trust and Investment Committee are paid an annual cash retainer of $12,000, with the Chair paid an annual cash retainer of $15,000.

The annual Board and committee cash retainers are paid in quarterly installments, with quarterly payments paid in arrears at the beginning of each calendar quarter for service during the prior quarter.

Directors who are salaried officers of M&T or its subsidiaries do not receive any compensation for their service as directors.

30

 

23LOGO


The following table sets forth the compensation of directors (who are not salaried officers of M&T or its subsidiaries) for fiscal year 2023.

2023 Director Compensation Table

 

Name

  

Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
(1)

($)

   Stock
Awards
(2)(3)
($)
   All Other
Compensation
($)
     

Total

($)

 

John. P. Barnes

   115,000.00    120,013.20   —      235,013.20 

Robert T. Brady

   140,000.00    130,077.20   —      270,077.20 

Carlton J. Charles(4)

   135,000.00    120,013.20   —      255,013.20 

Jane Chwick

   115,000.00    120,013.20   —      235,013.20 

William F. Cruger, Jr.

   110,000.00    120,013.20   —      230,013.20 

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

   110,000.00    124,069.20   —      234,069.20 

Gary N. Geisel

   130,000.00    124,069.20   —      254,069.20 

Leslie V. Godridge

   130,000.00    120,013.20   —      250,013.20 

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

   130,000.00    120,013.20   —      250,013.20 

Melinda R. Rich

   105,000.00    120,013.20   —      225,013.20 

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.

   155,000.00    128,125.20   —      283,125.20 

Denis J. Salamone

   145,000.00    120,013.20   —      265,013.20 

John R. Scannell

   105,000.00    120,013.20   —      225,013.20 

Rudina Seseri

   102,000.00    120,013.20   —      222,013.20 

Kirk. W. Walters

   102,000.00    120,013.20   —      222,013.20 

Herbert L. Washington

   125,000.00    120,013.20   —      245,013.20 

(1)

As described above the table, cash fees are paid in quarterly installments at the beginning of each calendar quarter for service the prior quarter.

(2)

The amounts in this column include the annual Board equity retainer granted in April 2023 under the compensation program for our non-employee directors, as described on the prior page. The annual Board equity retainer was granted under the 2019 Equity Plan and vests upon the one-year anniversary of the grant date. The grant date fair value of the annual Board equity retainer is based on the closing price of M&T common stock on the NYSE as of the grant date. Grants to directors for the annual Board equity retainer are rounded up to the next whole share.

(3)

For each of Messrs. Cunningham, Geisel and Sadler, the amount listed in this column also includes the grant date fair value of an annual equity award paid for such director’s service on an M&T Bank Regional Directors Advisory Council (each, a “DAC Award”), which is granted under the 2019 Equity Plan and is vested upon grant. The grant date fair value of each annual DAC Award granted in 2023 as included in the column is based on the closing price of M&T common stock on the NYSE as of the grant date and is as follows for each director: (i) $4,065 for Mr. Cunningham; (ii) $4,065 for Mr. Geisel; and (iii) $8,112 for Mr. Sadler.

(4)

Mr. Charles was elected to the Board in January 2023. For service in the first quarter of 2023, in addition to his quarterly cash retainer payment for such period, Mr. Charles received $30,000 in cash fees reflecting the prorated value of the equity retainer for such period.

M&T Bank Regional Directors Advisory Council Fees

As reflected in the 2023 Director Compensation Table above, Messrs. Cunningham, Geisel and Sadler also received an annual equity award in 2023 for their service on an M&T Bank Regional Directors Advisory Council (“DAC”). During 2023, Mr. Cunningham served as Chairman of the DAC of the Hudson Valley Division of M&T Bank; Mr. Geisel served as Chairman of the DAC of the Baltimore-Washington Division of M&T Bank; and Mr. Sadler served as Chairman of the DAC of the Florida Division of M&T Bank. The annual equity award for DAC service is granted under the 2019 Equity Plan and is vested upon grant. The value of each equity award is described in the 2023 Director Compensation Table above.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Under M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards, each director is expected to own shares of M&T common stock, which includes all beneficially owned shares and unvested restricted stock units, with a value equal to at least five times the amount of the director’s annual cash retainer. Each director is expected to meet this ownership guideline by the fifth anniversary of his or her initial election to the Board. Directors who receive no personal compensation for their service are not subject to this guideline. All directors are in compliance with the director stock ownership guidelines (as of February 14, 2024).

LOGO

31


STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATIONStock Ownership Information

The tables below set forth direct and indirect ownership of common stock and restricted common(and in the case of Mr. Walters, ownership of a series of preferred stock as described) by each of our directors, each of the named executive officers,NEOs, all directors and executive officers as a group, and by each person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of M&T’s common stocksuch securities as of February 28, 2018, together with14, 2024. The tables also show the percentage of total shares outstanding of common stock and preferred stock, as applicable, represented by such ownership.ownership as of February 14, 2024.

For purposes of these tables, beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the provisions of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) where, in general, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if such person has or shares the power to vote or to direct the voting of the security or the power to dispose or to direct the disposition of the security, or if such person has the right to acquire the beneficial ownership of the security within 60 days.

Directors and Named Executive Officers Stock Ownership

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

Number of Shares

Percentage of Class

Brent D. BairdJohn P. Barnes

31,681

329,133

(1)(2)

*

C. Angela Bontempo

12,925

(1)

*

Robert T. Brady

21,545(3)*

Carlton J. Charles

954*

16,615Jane Chwick

4,540*

William F. Cruger, Jr.

(2)

7,401*

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

23,852

25,212

(3)(4)

*

Gary N. Geisel

20,742

19,652

*

Richard S. GoldLeslie V. Godridge

38,954

2,649

(4)

*

Richard A. Grossi

1,862

*

John D. Hawke, Jr.

5,828

*

René F. Jones

52,179

217,911

(2)(5)(6)

*

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

176

4,758

*

Newton P.S. Merrill

1,251

*

Melinda R. Rich

14,108

20,631

*

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.

112,347

100,707

(5)(7)

*

Denis J. Salamone

163,897

77,084

(6)(7)(8)

*

John R. Scannell

85

4,393

*

David S. ScharfsteinRudina Seseri

1,736*

Kirk W. Walters

332

110,319

(2)(6)(9)

*
40,000(10)

*

Herbert L. Washington

16,345(11)*

Daryl N. Bible

15,000*

11,899Christopher E. Kay

(8)

16,218

(2)*

Darren J. King

101,122(2)(6)(12)*

Doris P. Meister

57,317

(6)(9)(10)

33,987

(2)(6)

*

Kevin J. Pearson

35,756

124,497

(9)(2)(6)(13)

*

Doris P. Meister

1,142

*

Current directors and executive officers as a group (28(29 persons)

common stock ownership

1,370,747

(2)(6)

*

Current directors and executive officers as a group (29 persons) Series H

Perpetual Non-Cumulative Preferred stock ownership

40,000

 

*

717,643Represents shares of common stock, except as indicated in footnote 10 for Mr. Walters.

*

Less than 1% of class of shares (i.e., of outstanding common stock or preferred stock, as applicable)

32

 

(6)(9)

*LOGO


*

Lessthan 1%

(1)

Includes 4001,558 shares held by trusts for which Ms. Bontempo is a trusteethe Nancy Barnes Living Trust and in which she has a pecuniary interest and investment power.

(2)

Includes 8,00069,960 shares held by a charitable remainder annuity trust of which Mr. Brady and his spouse are co-trustees and of which Mr. Brady’s spouse is the current annuity beneficiary for the lesser of her life or 21 years.John P. Barnes Living Trust.

(3)(2)

Includes 12,574 shares held through client accounts at Magnolia Capital Management, Ltd., a registered investment advisory firm of which Mr. Cunningham is the Chief Executive Officer and controlling shareholder and over which he has dispositive and voting powers over such shares.  Mr. Cunningham has no pecuniary interest in such shares.

(4)

Includes 2.155 shares held jointly with a close relative of Mr. Gold.  Also includes 17 shares held indirectly as custodian for his son.

(5)

Includes 26,157 shares owned by the Sadler Family Foundation, a charitable foundation formed by Mr. Sadler.  Mr. Sadler is a trustee of the Sadler Family Foundation and holds voting and dispositive power over the shares owned by it. Also includes 33,993 shares owned by a close relative of Mr. Sadler.

24


(6)

Includes the following shares subject to options granted under (a) M&T’s&T ‘s incentive compensation plans, and (b) plans of companies acquired by M&T, the obligations of which have been assumed by M&T and converted into options to receive shares of M&T common stock, all of which are currently exercisable or are exercisable within 60 days after February 28, 2018:14, 2024: Mr. Barnes – 221,722 shares; Mr. Jones – 120,960 shares; Mr. Walters – 69,165 shares; Mr. Kay – 5,818 shares; Mr. King – 10,00041,080 shares; Ms. Meister – 25,538 shares; Mr. SalamonePearson57,35867,414 shares; and all directors and executive officers as a group – 67,358616,206 shares. Out-of-the-money options are included in the shares presented as beneficially owned to the extent they are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after February 28, 2018.  14, 2024.

((3)7)

Includes 5,0008,000 shares held by a charitable remainder annuity trust of which Mr. Brady and his spouse are co-trustees and of which Mr. Brady’s spouse is the current annuity beneficiary for the lesser of her life or 21 years.

(4)

Includes 11,619 shares held through client accounts at Magnolia Capital Management, Ltd., a registered investment advisory firm of which Mr. Cunningham is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and over which shares he has dispositive and voting powers. Mr. Cunningham has no pecuniary interest in such shares.

(5)

Includes 1,360.3 shares held indirectly as custodian for Mr. Jones’ children.

(6)

Includes shares through participation in the M&T Bank Corporation Retirement Savings Plan: Mr. Jones – 5,709 shares; Mr. Walters – 8 shares; Mr. King – 1,230 shares; Ms. Meister – 1,175 shares; Mr. Pearson – 3,283 shares; and all directors and executive officers as a group – 14,648 shares. Such individuals retain voting and investment power over their respective shares in the M&T Bank Corporation Retirement Savings Plan.

(7)

Includes 19,398 shares owned by the SalamoneSadler Family Foundation, a non-profit corporationcharitable foundation formed by Mr. Salamone.Sadler. Mr. SalamoneSadler is a trustee of the SalamoneSadler Family Foundation and holds voting and dispositive power over the shares owned by it. Also includes 32,831 shares owned by a close relative of Mr. Sadler.

(8)

Includes 25,000 shares held in a grantor retained annuity trust of which Mr. Salamone is the trustee. Mr. Salamone disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

 

(9)

Includes 4,688 shares owned by Lacey & Sadie, LLC and 30,091 shares owned by Gus & Bonnie, LLC.

((10)

Shares of Perpetual Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series H, par value $1.00 per share, owned by Gus & Bonnie, LLC.

8(11))

Includes 500 shares owned by a close relative of Mr. Washington.

((12)9)

Includes the following shares through participation in the M&T Bank Corporation Retirement Savings Plan: Mr. King – 2,267 shares; Mr. Pearson – 2,721 shares; and all directors and executive officers as a group – 17,646 shares.  Such individuals retain voting and investment power over their respective shares in the Retirement Savings Plan.

(10)

Includes 1,1581,450 shares held indirectly as custodian for Mr. King’s children.son and 2,900 shares held by close relatives of Mr. King.

M&T Bank Corporation Insider Trading Policy

All of M&T’s directors, officers and employees are subject to M&T’s Insider Trading Policy which prohibits short-term trading in M&T’s securities, including but not limited to, the use of such strategies as exchange-traded options and the use of puts and calls, caps and collars and short sales.  This policy effectively serves as an anti-hedging policy.
(13)

Includes 5,788 shares held in a grantor retained annuity trust of which Mr. Pearson is the trustee. Mr. Pearson disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all persons or groups known by M&T to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of its outstanding common stock as of February 28, 2018.14, 2024.

Beneficial Owners Holding More Than 5% of M&T Bank Corporation’s Common Stock

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

 

 

Percentage of

Class

 

Vanguard Group, Inc.

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

 

14,132,091

 

(1)

 

9.52

%

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

 

10,307,904

 

(2)

 

6.94

%

State Street Corporation

One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

 

7,763,321

 

(3)

 

5.23

%

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
Percentage
of Class

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

19,433,884(1)11.71%

Wellington Management Group LLP

280 Congress Street

Boston, MA 02210

13,341,040(2)8.04%

BlackRock, Inc.

50 Hudson Yards

New York, NY 10001

13,109,596(3)7.90%

State Street Corporation

One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

9,151,943(4)5.51%

 

(1)

(1)

The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) filed an amended Schedule 13G with the SEC on February 9, 201813, 2024, reporting that it is deemed to be the beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of M&T common stock.stock as of December 31, 2023. Vanguard reported that it has sole voting power with respect to 203,979 of the indicated shares, shared voting power with respect to 28,677217,569 of the indicated shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 13,904,40618,693,530 of the indicated shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 227,685740,354 of the indicated shares.

(2)

(2)

BlackRock, Inc.Wellington Management Group LLP (“BlackRock”Wellington Management”) filed an amended Schedule 13G with the SEC on January 25, 2018February 9, 2024, reporting that it is deemed to be the beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of M&T common stock. BlackRockstock as of December 31, 2023. Wellington Management reported that it has soleshared voting power with respect to 9,051,56312,356,467 of the indicated shares and soleshared dispositive power with respect to all 10,307,90413,341,040 of the indicated shares, which includes shares beneficially owned by certain subsidiaries of BlackRock.Wellington Management.

(3)

(3)

State Street CorporationBlackRock, Inc. (“State Street”BlackRock”) filed aan amended Schedule 13G with the SEC on February 14, 2018January 26, 2024, reporting that it is deemed to be the beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of M&T common stock.stock as of December 31, 2023. BlackRock reported that it has sole voting power with respect to 11,930,479 of the indicated shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all 13,109,596 of the indicated shares, which includes shares beneficially owned by certain subsidiaries of BlackRock.

(4)

State Street Corporation (“State Street”) filed an amended Schedule 13G with the SEC on January 29, 2024, reporting that it is deemed to be the beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of M&T common stock as of December 31, 2023. State Street reported that it has shared voting power with respect to 1,379,317 of the indicated shares and shared dispositive power with respect to all 7,763,3219,141,128 of the indicated shares, which includes shares beneficially owned by certain subsidiaries of State Street.

 

LOGO

 

33

25


M&T is the sponsor of a number of employee benefit plans that hold an aggregate of 3,150,8713,583,977 shares of M&T common stock as of February 28, 2018.14, 2024. Its principal banking subsidiary, M&T Bank, has sole voting authority over 875,423815,423 of these shares. The remaining 2,275,4482,768,554 shares of M&T common stock are voted by the trustee of the applicable employee benefit plan pursuant to the instructions of the participants in accordance with the terms of each such plan. Certain of the directors and executive officers of M&T hold indirect beneficial interests in the holdings of these employee benefit plans. See also footnotes (6) and (9)footnote 6 to the table set forth above titled “DirectorsDirectors and Named Executive Officers Stock Ownership.Ownership.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceReports

UnderPursuant to Section 16(a)16 of the Exchange Act, M&T’s directors and our Section 16 reportingcertain officers, andas well as persons who beneficially own more than 10% of M&T’sthe outstanding shares of M&T’s common stock, are required to reportfile reports regarding their beneficialinitial M&T stock ownership and subsequent changes to their ownership with the SEC. Based solely on a review of the common stockreports filed for fiscal year 2023 and any changes in that beneficial ownership to the SEC and the NYSE.  M&T believes that these filing requirements were satisfied by all of its directors and Section 16 reporting officers during 2017.  In making the foregoing statement, M&T relied on copies of the reporting forms received by it or on therelated written representations from suchthe reporting persons, the company believes that no additional forms wereall filings required to be made by its reporting persons were filed underon a timely basis.

M&T Bank Corporation Insider Trading Policy

All of M&T’s directors, officers and employees are subject to M&T’s Insider Trading Policy. The Insider Trading Policy prohibits the purchase or sale of M&T securities by persons who possess material, nonpublic information, as well as the unauthorized disclosure of such information to others, and also sets forth M&T’s trading window limitations. In addition, as described below, the Insider Trading Policy sets forth M&T’s anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies.

Anti-Hedging Policy. All directors, officers and employees are prohibited from engaging in any transactions that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in the market value of M&T securities or from engaging in any form of short-term trading in M&T securities. Such prohibited short-term trading transactions include those involving exchange-traded options and the use of puts and calls, caps and collars and short sales, and prohibited hedging transactions include those involving prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, exchange funds and other derivatives that are designed to hedge.

Anti-Pledging Policy. All directors and executive officers are prohibited from holding M&T securities in a margin account, borrowing against any account in which M&T securities are held or pledging M&T securities as collateral for a loan or other indebtedness, except in the following limited circumstances: (1) the director or executive officer may only pledge shares he or she holds in excess of M&T’s applicable rulesstock ownership guidelines, (2) the director or executive officer must have the financial ability to repay the loan or margin call without resorting to the pledged securities, (3) in the case of an executive officer, prior to any pledging transaction, the executive officer must consult with M&T’s Chief Legal Officer to confirm compliance with the policy, and (4) any decision by a director to engage in a pledging transaction must be reported to the N&G Committee and the Chairman of the SEC.Board, and any decision by an executive officer to engage in pledging must be reported to the N&G Committee and the Chief Executive Officer.

 

34

26

 

LOGO


Transactions with Directors, Executive Officers and Certain Shareholders

 


TRANSACTIONS WITH DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

During 2017, Mr. Wilmers was the beneficial owner of a 50% interest in an entity that is unaffiliated with M&T and which owns commercial aircraft that is leased to a commercial aviation service.  From time to time, M&T or its subsidiaries engaged the aviation service for air transportation services for business use by Mr. Wilmers.  In 2017, M&T paid $735,189 to the aviation service company for aircraft transportation costs.  M&T determined that the fees paid to the aviation service company for such business use are fair and competitive. 

Mr. Sadler entered into a two-year consulting agreement with M&T effective July 1, 2016, pursuant to which he was paid a consulting fee of $200,000 per year.  M&T and Mr. Sadler voluntarily terminated this agreement effective April 1, 2017.

Directors and executive officers of M&T and their immediate family members and affiliated entities are, and have been, customers of, and have had transactions with the banking and other operating subsidiaries of M&T, and additional transactions may be expected to take place in the future between such persons and M&T’s subsidiaries. As described in “Board Independence” under the section titled “Corporate Governance of M&T Bank Corporation,” the Board reviews such related party or affiliate transactions in its review and assessment of director independence. Additionally, these transactions are subject to M&T’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. See “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” under the section titled “Corporate Governance of M&T Bank Corporation” above for more information.

Regulation O Policies and Procedures. Any financial services provided to directors, executive officers and their immediate family members and affiliated entities are offered in the ordinary course of business, upon substantially the same terms and conditions, including price, as we provide to similarly situated customers. M&T’s subsidiary banks also extend credit to some of the directors and their immediate family members and affiliated entities. All such extensions of credit outstanding at any time since January 1, 2017,2023, comply with our policies and procedures and Federal Reserve Board Regulation O. All extensions of credit were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to M&T or its subsidiary banks, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.  As described

Related-Party Transactions Policy. The Board adopted a written related-party transactions policy in “Board Independence” underNovember 2022. Under the section titled “CORPORATE GOVERANCE OFpolicy, our executive officers, directors (and nominees), large shareholders, and their immediate family members (each a “Related Party”) may not enter into a transaction with M&T BANK CORPORATION,” suchor a subsidiary in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which the Related Party has a direct or indirect material interest, without approval from the N&G Committee. Under certain circumstances, a related party or affiliate transactions are one factor considered bytransaction may be brought before the Board for consideration, and the Board may elect to review any proposed related party transaction or designate another independent body of Directorsthe Board to review the proposed transaction. Under the policy, Related Parties are deemed not to have a direct or indirect material interest in various types of transactions, including certain compensation provided in connection with the discharge of duties; indemnification or advancement of expenses; charitable contributions; transactions involving competitive bids; ordinary course loans and other ordinary course deposit, banking, commercial, fiduciary or other financial services relationships; and transactions in which a Related Party’s interest derives solely from his or her service as a director of another entity or from certain equity interests.

Our N&G Committee (or Board or other independent body of the Board) will take into account the following factors, as appropriate, among other factors it deems appropriate in approving or rejecting a proposed transaction: (i) the benefits to M&T and whether the transaction is consistent with the interests of M&T and its reviewshareholders; (ii) whether the transaction would impair the independence of director independence.an otherwise independent non-employee director; (iii) the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; (iv) whether the terms of the transaction are fair to M&T and on the same basis as would apply if the transaction did not involve a Related Party; and (v) whether the transaction would present an improper conflict of interest.

M&T’s CodeCertain Transactions. A family member of Business Conductone of our executive officers (Michael J. Todaro) and Ethics, which is applicable toa family member of one of our directors officers, advisors(John P. Barnes) each is employed as non-executive officer employee of M&T Bank. During 2023, each person earned more than $120,000 in total direct compensation from M&T Bank. This compensation is within the range for employees within the same grade as each person.

LOGO

35


BlackRock, Inc. and employees,subsidiaries (“BlackRock”) and FMR LLC and subsidiaries (“Fidelity”) were each the beneficial owners of more than 5 percent of our common stock for all or part of 2023. We engaged Blackrock Investment Management, LLC as wella sub-advisor, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. as toa glidepath manager and utilized BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. funds within our agents and representatives, including consultants, requires that individuals avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws and other legal requirements, conduct business in an honest and ethical manner, and otherwise act with integrity andWilmington Trust, N.A. collective funds. These relationships were in the best interestsordinary course, at arms-length and unrelated to BlackRock’s ownership of M&T.  The Codeour stock. In 2023, our collective funds paid fees of Business Conductapproximately $6.8 million and Ethics expects individuals$1,580 to report any observed illegal or unethical behavior,BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. and provides a retaliation-free reporting mechanism.  Blackrock Investment Management, LLC, respectively. Our Collective Investment Trust business was divested in April 2023. Additionally, we engage Fidelity Stock Plan Services LLC to provide administration and recordkeeping services for its stock plans, including its equity compensation awards and Employee Stock Purchase Program. These relationships are in the ordinary course, at arms-length and unrelated to Fidelity’s ownership of M&T stock. In 2023, we paid fees of approximately $501,395 to Fidelity Stock Plan Services LLC.

 

36

 

27LOGO


 PROPOSAL 2

PROPOSAL 2

ADVISORY, NON-BINDING PROPOSALVOTE TO APPROVE THE 20172023 COMPENSATION OF M&T BANK CORPORATION’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

M&T Bank Corporation believes that its 20172023 compensation policies and practices are centered on a pay-for-performance culture and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of its shareholders, while reducing incentives for unnecessary and excessive risk taking. Our executive compensation programs are described in detail in the sections titled “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS”Compensation Discussion and “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.Analysis and “Executive Compensation” below.

Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank(the “Dodd-Frank Act”), enacted on July 21, 2010, requires and related SEC rules require that all U.S. public companies provide their shareholders with an advisory vote on the compensation of their named executive officers. On January 25, 2011, the SEC adopted final rules implementing this requirement.  At each Annual Meeting of Shareholders since M&T’s 2011 Annual Meeting, of Shareholders, the Board of Directors has provided shareholders with the ability to vote, on an advisory basis, on the compensation of M&T’s NEOs.named executive officers.

This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives shareholders the opportunity to vote on the overall compensation program of M&T and specifically as it applies to the NEOsnamed executive officers through the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the 20172023 compensation paid to M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby approved.”

The shareholder vote on this matter is advisory, meaning that it will serve as a recommendation to the Board, of Directors, but will not be binding. The NCGC&HC Committee will consider the outcome of this vote when determining future executive compensation arrangements.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF
THE 2017

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE 2023 COMPENSATION OF M&T BANK CORPORATION’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

LOGO

37

 


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

28


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Named Executive Officers

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) provides information regarding the 2023 compensation of all individuals who served as M&T’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) during 2017, M&T’s current and four other named executive officers (“NEOs”), which include, pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, M&T’s principal financial officerformer Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the CEOsCEO and CFO.  The NEOs are members of our executive leadership team (“Management Group”CFO (collectively, the “NEOs”). For 2017,2023, our NEOs were the following individuals:

 

Name

Title

NameRené F. Jones

Title

Robert G. Wilmers(1)

Chairman

Chief Executive Officer

(through December 16, 2017)

René F. Jones(2)Daryl N. Bible

ChairmanSenior Executive Vice President

Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer

(appointment effective December 20, 2017)

Darren J. King

Senior Executive Vice President

Co-Head of Businesses & Former Chief Financial Officer

Richard S. Gold(3)

President

Chief Operating Officer

(appointment effective December 20, 2017)

Kevin J. Pearson(4)

Vice Chairman & Co-Head of Businesses

Christopher E. Kay

Senior Executive Vice President

Vice Chairman – M&T Bank

Head of Enterprise Platforms

Doris P. Meister

Senior Executive Vice President

Head of Wealth Management

 

38

LOGO

(1)

Mr. Wilmers passed away on December 16, 2017.

(2)

Mr. Jones began the year as Vice Chairman with oversight responsibilities of M&T’s Wealth and Institutional Services, Treasury and Human Resources divisions.  He served in that capacity until he was appointed CEO on December 20, 2017.

(3)

Mr. Gold began the year as Vice Chairman and Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) with additional oversight responsibilities for M&T’s Legal Division. As of April 3, 2017, Mr. Gold moved out of the role of CRO and expanded his oversight responsibilities to include Retail Banking, Mortgage and Consumer Lending and Marketing divisions in addition to the Legal Division. On December 20, 2017 Mr. Gold was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer.

(4)

Mr. Pearson began the year as Vice Chairman with oversight responsibilities for M&T’s Commercial Banking and Credit divisions. As of April 3, 2017, Mr. Pearson’s oversight responsibilities expanded to include M&T’s Technology and Banking Operations divisions.

29


Executive Summary

Overview of M&T Bank Corporation

 

M&T's

M&T’s vision is focused on long-term sustained performance. We strive to consistently maintain a conservative risk profile and a strong financial position so we can maintain high levels of service to our customers and communities throughout economic cycles.

Our objectives include:

M&T Bank Corporation is a financial holding company that through its subsidiary banks offers a wide range of retail and commercial banking, trust, wealth advisory and investment services to its customers.  Founded in 1856, M&T strives to be the best company our employees work for, the best bank our customers ever do business with, and the best investment our shareholders ever make. M&T concluded 2017 as one of the 20 largest U.S. based commercial bank holding companies with over 775 domestic branches and 1,800 ATMs across our footprint.

Dedication to the creation and preservation of shareholder value

Conservative credit standards

Disciplined but opportunistic acquisition strategy

Focus on operating efficiency

2017 Performance Results and Executive Compensationa strong financial position to ensure high levels of service to our customers and communities throughout economic cycles.

2023 Financial Performance Highlights

M&T’s 2017 financialresults for 2023 reflected a year of strong performance met its business plan onas measured by several key metrics including diluted net income,operating earnings per common share, (“EPS”), andnet operating return on assets.average tangible assets, and net operating return on average tangible common equity with 2023 operating results exceeding 2022 performance on all three metrics(1). M&T’s 2023 financial performance in 2017 reflected elevated expenses associated with pre-merger Wilmington Trust Corporation litigation matters. Excluding these legal-related expenses,reflects disciplined balance sheet management, prudent pricing during a period of higher rates and customer disintermediation, and diligent expense management to generate positive operating expenses were well controlled.leverage. Through a period of economic uncertainty, M&T grew Tangible Book Value per Share and Common Equity Tier 1 capital while reducing its Stress Capital Buffer during the year. Notwithstanding M&T’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) remains in the top quartile of itsstrong results cited below, and our performance relative to our peer group, overM&T’s performance on diluted net operating earnings per common share, net operating return on average tangible assets, and net operating return on average tangible common equity were below its Operating Plan largely driven by the long term (10-, 15- and 20-year periods). The executive compensation actions described on the following pages were takenrate environment. Specific 2023 performance highlights are noted below:(2)

GAAP-basis net income in January 2018 related to 2017 performance, which includes the following highlights:2023 totaled $2.74 billion, increasing 38% from $1.99 billion in 2022;

Diluted earnings per common share, which include merger-related expenses in 2022, were $15.79 compared with $11.53 in 2022; diluted net operating earnings per common share(1) increased 12% to $16.08 from $14.42 in 2022;

 

GAAP-basis net income expressed as rate of return on average assets and average common shareholders’ equity of 1.33% and 11.06%, respectively, as compared with 1.05% and 8.67% in 2022; net operating return on average tangible assets and average tangible common shareholders’ equity of 1.23%(1) were 1.42% and 13.00%17.60%, respectively, as compared to 1.14%with 1.35% and 12.25%16.70% in 2016;(1)2022;

diluted earnings per share were $8.70, an increaseTaxable-equivalent net interest income for 2023 was $7.17 billion, compared with $5.86 billion in 2022 reflecting a higher net interest margin (3.83% in 2023 vs. 3.39% in 2022) and a larger balance sheet; average loans grew 11% in 2023 primarily driven by commercial and industrial loans;

Non-interest income excluding gains/losses on investment securities grew 7% from prior year, driven by growth in mortgage banking revenues, particularly in mortgage servicing, and commercial service charges; reported 2023 non-interest income includes a $225 million gain on the sale of 12%;Collective Investment Trust business while reported 2022 non-interest income included a $136 million gain on the sale of the M&T Insurance Agency;

Non-interest operating expense(1) grew 14% from the prior year. 2023 results include a special FDIC assessment of $197 million; excluding this impact, non-interest operating expense grew 10% from 2022, largely driven by a full year of operations of People’s United Financial, Inc. and increased compensation costs;

netNet charge-offs totaled $140 million for the year (equal to 0.16%expressed as a percentage of average loans);loans was 0.33% compared with 0.13% in 2022;

received a “Non-Objection” to the 2017 Capital Plan from regulators;

repurchased $1.2 billion ofIn 2023, M&T’s common stock and paid an additional $457dividend grew 8% representing the 7th year of consecutive increases; in Q1 2023 M&T repurchased 3.8 million shares at a total cost of common dividends$600 million, or 2% of outstanding shares, no shares were repurchased in the last three quarters of 2023; M&T’s Common Equity Tier 1 ratio remained strong at 10.98% at the end of 2023, up from 10.44% at year-end 2022; Tangible Book Value per Share grew 14% from $86.59 at the end of 2022 to our shareholders, in accordance with$98.54 at the 2016 and 2017 Capital Plans;end of 2023.

increased common dividends for the first time in more than nine years; and

(1)

recognized asM&T consistently provides supplemental reporting of its results on a “net operating” or “tangible” basis, from which M&T excludes the 8th largest Small Business Association lenderafter-tax effect of amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (and the related goodwill and core deposit and other intangible asset balances, net of applicable deferred tax amounts) and expenses associated with merging acquired operations into M&T (when incurred), since such items are considered by management to be “nonoperating” in nature. See Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in M&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the U.S. and 4th largest inyear ended December 31, 2023, filed with the eastern U.S.SEC on February 21, 2024 (the “2023 Form 10-K”) for a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with these corresponding non-GAAP amounts.

(2)

(1)

For more information, see Management’s“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations containedOperations” in M&T’sthe 2023 Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed with the SEC on February 22, 2018.

 

30

LOGO

 

39


In addition to the above financial highlights from 2023, M&T continued to focus on its core businesses across a growing footprint, helping our clients achieve their financial goals while making a difference in people’s lives throughout 2023. M&T regularly assesses the health and vitality of each of our businesses to see where we might be able to deliver more value for our clients and our shareholders. As part of that exercise, last year we sold our Collective Investment Trust business to a firm with deep expertise in the space. This transaction aims to scale the support we can provide to our clients while positively impacting the returns we deliver for our shareholders.

M&T’s Executive Compensation PhilosophyPhilosophy and Objectives

The objectives of M&T’s executive compensation programs are to attract talented staff, develop leaders and retain executive officersexecutives capable of maximizing performance for the benefit of M&T and its shareholders. We endeavor, over time and based on performance, to establish total direct compensation (“TDC”) in a competitive range around the median of the market for our compensation peer group. Our long-standinglongstanding compensation philosophy is to emphasize long-term equity-based compensation for our NEOs. This philosophy, combined with C&HC Committee engagement and oversight, allows us to align our compensation with performance in the following important ways:by:

by explicitly linking the size of individual equity awards to be grantedthe NEO’s role, responsibilities and prior and anticipated future contributions, as well as to the NEOs to the year over year performance of M&T;

by tying a significant portion of the NEOs’ ultimate realized compensation to future performance and the future value of M&T common stock, in alignment with our shareholders;

by balancing growth with prudent risk taking, through the use of performance-based restricted stock unit awards (“PSUs”) that only vest once certain levels of performance are met; andequity compensation with robust forfeiture provisions;

throughcreating a culture of stock ownership and retention, including in accordance withthrough M&T’s Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines resulting infor Executives;

performing, for each NEO, havingan annual assessment of the “market price of the seat” and balancing external data with an executive’s experience, role, responsibilities, and prior and anticipated future contributions; and

assessing short-term performance and awarding variable compensation based on a substantial financial stake tiedbalanced discretionary assessment of holistic bank and individual performance.

We design our executive compensation program to promote risk mitigation and good governance, which includes maintaining the following best practices:

What We Do:What We Don’t Do:

✓ Strong alignment between pay and performance

LOGOHedging or pledging of M&T securities (except in limited circumstances pursuant to prescribed policy)

✓ Discourage excessive risk taking through program design

LOGORepricing of stock options

✓ Maintain robust Stock Ownership & Retention Guidelines

LOGO“Timing” of equity grants (i.e., instead we only grant long-term incentives on pre-determined dates)

✓ Retain an independent compensation consultant to advise and support the C&HC Committee in its role

LOGOTax gross-ups (other than in connection with relocation)

✓ Maintain a compensation forfeiture policy which subjects incentives to risk adjustments

LOGOPay dividends on unvested stock units or unearned performance units

✓ Review share utilization

LOGOGrant excessive severance, pension or other benefits

✓ Annual risk assessment of incentive compensation plans

LOGOEnter into employment contracts with our executives

✓ Routinely engage with shareholders

✓ Use a peer group to provide perspective on competitive pay levels

40

LOGO


2023 Say-on-Pay Vote and Shareholder Outreach

Our 2023 shareholder vote on executive compensation passed with 93.39% support. The C&HC Committee considered this to be an indication that our shareholders believe that the NEOs’ compensation is aligned with the performance of M&T.

In addition, we regularly engage with our shareholders’ proxy voting and investor stewardship teams to gain a deeper understanding of the perspectives and concerns related to our executive compensation programs. In these meetings, our shareholders have generally expressed a positive view with respect to our executive compensation program.

We regularly evaluate whether our executive compensation programs support our compensation philosophy and objectives and monitor program alignment with our priorities. Further, we continue to look for ways to provide transparent disclosure around these programs. In connection with this review, combined with other factors discussed in this CD&A as well as the feedback we received from our shareholders, the C&HC Committee made the following changes in recent years:

Continuing to emphasize the link between long-term company performance and executive compensation by issuing a significant proportion of NEO Long Term Incentive (“LTI”) in the form of Performance-Vested Stock Units (“PVSUs”), providing an increase in the proportion delivered in PVSUs for 2023 performance that were granted in 2024; and

Developing and introducing performance scorecards for our NEOs that explicitly link company, business unit/function and individual performance to compensation determinations for formal use in performance year 2023 and beyond.

LOGO

41


Components of Executive Compensation

The components of our executive compensation program, described below, align with M&T’s philosophy to emphasize long-term equity-based compensation, while providing executive compensation that will attract and retain executive officers capable of achieving M&T’s performance objectives.

 

Compensation
Element

Objective

Objective

Determination of Award Levels &and Key Features

Base Salary

Provides conservativefixed pay reflective of an executive’s role, responsibilities and individual performance

Provides a fixed element

Scope of the executive’s responsibilities

Experience

Internal and external comparison

Past and expected future performance

• Peer compensation market data

Short-Term:

Cash Incentive

(“STI”)

Provides discretionary annual incentive opportunity generally reflective of overall bank and individual performance; considers both quantitative and qualitative performance

• Quantitative – reflects balance between financial and risk performance

• Qualitative – reflects progress towards key strategic initiatives and other individual performance factors

Pool funded based on a percentpercentage of net operating income (“NOI”)

Rewards NEOs based on:

corporateØ Company performance as reflected by financial results (including key metrics such as NOI,net operating income, EPS, Efficiency Ratio, Return on Tangible Common Equity (“ROTCE”)(ROTCE), Return on Tangible Assets (ROTA) and TSR)returns to shareholders)(1)

achievementØ Achievement of annual performance objectives (financialacross all stakeholder groups (customers, communities, employees and non-financial)regulators, including both financial and non-financial measures)

riskØ Risk management and adherence to risk appetite

otherØ Other key strategic initiatives for the year

Ø Award values also consider peer compensation market data

Long-Term:

Equity-Based Incentive

(“LTI”)

Provides discretionary equity-based incentive opportunity generally reflective of overall bank and individual performance

Aligns executivesrewards with the goal of sustained long-term performance and shareholder value

Provides a strong retention tool

• Unearned/unvested awards subject to forfeiture

Equity-based incentives awarded to NEOs in 2018 for 2017 performance are in the form of PSUsperformance-based stock unit awards and stock options.options

 

PSUs Key Features: Performance-based stock unit awards key features:

Ø Performance-Hurdled Stock Units (PHSUs)

¡Vesting: 3 yearRatably at target over three years

¡   Performance Metric: Absolute ROTCE(1)

Ø Performance-Vested Stock Unit Awards (PVSUs)

¡   Vesting: Cliff vest after a 3-year performance period with final payout ranging from 0%-150% of target based on performance

¡Performance Measurement: Prior yearMetric: Absolute ROTCE (rate established byand Relative ROTCE to peer group(1)

¡   Beginning with the NCG Committee prior to2024 grant, the annual grant date)Performance Metrics will also include Absolute and Relative ROTA(1)

 Non-QualifiedStock Options Key Features:(NQ Stock Options) key features:

ØVesting: 3 year3-year annual pro-rata

ØOption Term: 10 years

 

Rewards NEOs Initial award value is based on a reviewon:

Ø Roles/responsibilities and expected future contribution

Ø Company and individual performance for the immediately preceding year

Ø Consideration of the following factors:peer compensation market data

corporate performance relative to peers

absolute corporate• Amount ultimately realized is based on:

Ø Absolute company performance for the immediately preceding year relative to the business plan

Ø Absolute and relative company performance over the 3-year period from date of grant

ØLong-term, sustained corporate performance and stock price

(1)

The C&HC Committee and management use certain non-GAAP financial measures as they believe they better reflect the impact of acquisition activity in reported results. See Appendix A of this proxy statement as well as “Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in the 2023 Form 10-K for a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with these corresponding non-GAAP amounts. See Appendix A of this proxy statement as well for a description of how ROTCE and ROTA are calculated.

42

Peer compensation market dataLOGO


2023 Performance Year Pay Mix

Our executive compensation program provides for a market-competitive mix of base salary, short-term cash incentives (STI) and long-term equity-based incentives (LTI) that vest over time in alignment with our compensation philosophy and the objectives cited above. In light of the financial results cited above, the short-term incentive plan funding for the company was established at 90% of target, with target representing a fully funded market-competitive STI pool.

Executive performance scorecards were introduced for 2023 performance year and serve to provide more structure around our performance-guided discretionary variable compensation program, specifically with respect to short-term incentive awards. The executive performance scorecards consider overall bank performance, in addition to the performance of the business unit(s) or functional area(s) led by each NEO and their individual contributions predominantly with respect to risk management, leadership and talent development. As a result of the executive performance scorecard review, short-term incentives were increased for some NEOs and decreased for others. For continued retention and shareholder alignment, LTI awards for NEOs were maintained at 2022 performance year levels or increased modestly to better reflect market competitiveness.

The charts below represent the 2023 performance year total compensation pay mix of our CEO and the average of our other NEOs. For purposes of this and other “performance year” disclosures in this CD&A, compensation for the “performance year” consists of (i) annual base salary as of the end of the performance year, (ii) STI paid in the following year for the prior year’s performance, and (iii) the LTI award (target value) granted in the following year for the prior year’s performance and in consideration of anticipated future contributions. The LTI award is comprised of PHSUs, PVSUs and NQ Stock Options. This view differs from the disclosure in the 2023 Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) set forth in the “Executive Compensation” section beginning on page 65 below, in that the LTI awards disclosed in the SCT reflect equity awards granted during 2023 for the prior performance year (i.e., 2022 performance). We prefer the performance year view as this is how we (and many of our peer companies) tend to view executive compensation.

The charts below show the 2023 performance year pay mix for our CEO and the average for our other NEOs, of which 88% of pay is “at risk” for Mr. Jones and, on average, 83% of pay is “at risk” for our other NEOs.

 

LOGO

LOGO

*Excludes one NEO (Ms. Meister) who was not granted an LTI award in 2024 in light of her upcoming transition to a consulting role. See page 60 below.

LOGO

 

43

31


Roles and ResponsibilitiesResponsibilities

M&T’s executive compensation programs are administered through the joint efforts of various constituents in an effort to ensure sound holistic governance overaround compensation determinations.

Role of the NCGC&HC Committee

The NCGC&HC Committee is responsible for determining theM&T’s compensation philosophy and objectives, as well as compensation of the NEOsexecutive officers (including the NEOs) and then reviewsreporting such determinations withto the full Board of Directors.Board. As discussed below, in determining the amount and mix of compensation to be paid to each NEO, the NCGC&HC Committee reviews the compensation levels of the NEOs relative to a group of commercial banking peers that are similar in size and business mix (the “peer group”). As part of this review, the C&HC Committee also considers the financial performance of M&T relative to thatthe peer group, as well as certain other factors, including M&T’s stock price performance and relative shareholder return,returns, compensation mix strategy,philosophy, risk management, and individual and corporate performance.

The NCGC&HC Committee’s responsibilities include:

annually reviewing and approving the corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO compensation and evaluating the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives;

annually reviewing and approving the base salaries, and annual incentive opportunities and overall TDC of the NEOs;NEOs and other Section 16 executive officers; and

annually reviewing and approving equity award opportunities of the NEOs; and

determining and approving the overall total direct compensation (“TDC”) determinations for the NEOs.

Additionally, the NCGThe C&HC Committee receives reports from the CFO and CROChief Risk Officer (“CRO”) regarding M&T’s financial performance and risk management performance, respectively, prior to finalizing TDC for the NEOs. The following table provides an overviewC&HC Committee regularly meets with the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, and Chief Talent Officer to review the effectiveness of the executivebank’s performance management, compensation, and succession planning practices. This increases transparency and governance related responsibilitiesin areas such as pay-for-performance, pay equity, identification of succession risks, and management’s efforts to mitigate those risks by preparing future leaders to operate the NCG Committee. The NCGbank. To further support succession planning, in 2023 the C&HC Committee held a joint meeting with the N&G Committee to review succession plans for executive leadership roles, including Chief Executive Officer, and other key positions and intends to hold this meeting annually going forward. Additionally, the C&HC Committee’s independent compensation consultant, whose role is described more fully below, participates in meetings throughout the year, as requested.

32


Role of the Chief Executive Officer

The Chief Executive Officer (and the Vice Chairman, with respect to Ms. Meister only) provided the performance assessments for the NEOs (other than the Chief Executive Officer) and made compensation recommendations to the C&HC Committee in this regard. Performance achieved against business unit/function and individual goals set in early 2023, as well as overall bank financial results and risk management were considered when making the initial compensation recommendations. Ultimate decision making authority for the compensation determinations for all NEOs, including the Chief Executive Officer, however, lies solely with the C&HC Committee.

Role of Independent Compensation Consultant

In 2017,2023, the NCGC&HC Committee continued to retain McLagan, which is part of the services of McLagan, anHuman Capital Solutions practice at Aon Hewitt company.plc, to provide executive compensation consulting services. McLagan’s role is to provide analysis and advice to the NCGC&HC Committee relative toregarding the amount and form of executive compensation, attend NCGC&HC Committee meetings, as requested, and advise the NCGC&HC Committee on executive compensation levels, market trends, regulatory issues and other developments that may impact

44

LOGO


M&T’s executive compensation programs. In 2017,2023, McLagan performed the following services for the NCGC&HC Committee:

reviewedrecommended the peer group used as a reference for compensation benchmarkingdecisions for the NEOs;

conducted detailed market analysisanalyses on executive and director compensation relative to our peer group, including all elements of TDC, and advised on general industry pay practices;

advised the NCGC&HC Committee on setting NEOcontemporary pay practices to create executive compensation opportunities that align more closely with M&T’s strategic objectives and long-term performance;

advised the C&HC Committee on market competitive base salaries, annual cash incentives and long-term incentives including the reasonableness of the levels of such compensation;for NEOs; and

advised the NCGC&HC Committee on regulatory issues which primarily focused on the Dodd-Frank Act.issues.

33


M&TThe fees for these services totaled $304,698. McLagan/Aon also engaged McLagan to provideprovided $305,299 in additional services.  Specifically, McLagan provided compensation consultingsurvey/advisory services to management during 2017 in an amount that did not exceed $120,000.2023. Management engaged McLaganMcLagan/Aon for these services after consultation with the NCGC&HC Committee. The NCG Committee determined that, basedBased on an assessment of SEC and NYSE factors, the C&HC Committee determined that McLagan was independent and that engagement of McLagan did not present any conflicts of interest. McLagan also determined that it was independent from our management and confirmed this in a written statement delivered to the NCG Committee.

Role of the Chief Executive Officer and the President

The Chief Executive Officer and the President provide a performance assessment for the members of Management Group (including the other NEOs) and make compensation recommendations to the NCG Committee in this regard.  Ultimate decision-making authority for the compensation determinations for all NEOs, including the Chief Executive Officer and the President, however, lies solely with the NCGC&HC Committee.

Peer Group

On an annual basis, the NCGC&HC Committee, compareswith the assistance of McLagan, makes decisions about compensation levels for each of the NEOs and M&T’s financial performancewith reference to the compensation peer group—a group of commercial banking institutions of similar business makeup, size and geographic reach. For the 2023 year-end compensation review, M&T selectedcontinued the tenpractice of having the same peer group for both compensation (used as a reference for compensation levels for NEOs) and financial (used as a reference for our financial performance) comparison.

The eleven commercial banking companies listed below using thewere identified by selecting a group of U.S. basedU.S.-based commercial bank holding companies generally having assets between $50 billionor market capitalization within a reasonable range of M&T and $250 billion as of December 31, 2016, and removingexcluded those that had a significantly dissimilar business mix, or had a substantial international presence:presence. The 2023 peer group is unchanged from 2022:

2023 Peer Group (size statistics as of June 30, 2023)

Peer

    Market Cap (in Millions)     Assets (in Millions) 

U.S. Bancorp (USB)

     50,649      680,825 

PNC Financial Services Group, Inc (PNC)

     50,128      558,207 

Truist Financial Corporation (TFC)

     40,425      554,549 

M&T (MTB)

     20,531      207,672 

Percent Rank

     71%       60%  

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB)

     17,845      207,276 

Regions Financial Corporation (RF)

     16,721      155,656 

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN)

     15,608      188,505 

Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG)

     12,380      223,066 

KeyCorp (KEY)

     8,646      195,037 

First Horizon National Corporation (FHN)

     6,296      85,071 

Comerica Incorporated (CMA)

     5,579      90,761 

Zions Bancorporation (ZION)

     3,979      87,230 

Median (excluding M&T)

     15,608      195,037 

BB&T Corporation (BBT)

Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG)LOGO

Comerica Incorporated (CMA)

45

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB)

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN)

KeyCorp (KEY)

PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC)

Regions Financial Corporation (RF)

SunTrust Banks, Inc. (STI)

Zions Bancorporation (ZION)

 

The 2017 peer group was expanded


Process for Determining 2023 NEO Compensation

Factors Considered. In determining NEO compensation, the C&HC Committee uses a holistic and balanced discretionary approach, guided by the executive performance scorecards to include Citizens Financial Group, Inc.evaluate performance against the following quantitative and continues to include PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., notwithstanding the fact that it is outside the asset size criterion, due to its similar business makeup and presence in manyqualitative factors:

Quantitative Factors

Qualitative Factors

Operating Income

Asset quality relative to the banking industry

EPS

Responsiveness to economic environment

Return on Assets

Achievement of business plans

Returns to Shareholders

Achievement of performance objectives related to diversity, equity and inclusion, and employee engagement

Various capital ratios

Achievement of performance objectives related to customer satisfaction and customer growth

Competitive market compensation data

Leadership and establishment of strategic direction

Efficiency ratio

Effective risk management and adherence to the risk appetite

One of the markets wherekey components of our executive compensation program is tying pay to company performance. At the beginning of each year, bank-wide and business unit/function specific performance goals are established, as are other goals related to our strategic imperatives. At the end of the year, the C&HC Committee compares these expectations to actual results for M&T Bank conducts commercial banking activities.  and each NEO. We evaluate corporate performance by using a diverse set of performance metrics to ensure that no single measure can disproportionately impact compensation. Our performance is evaluated against internal expectations and our operating plan for the year and is balanced with a relative performance evaluation by comparing our results to those of the peer group.

Benchmarking

Based on the analysis performed by McLagan in November 2017, the TDCSTI and Executive Performance Scorecards. To further ensure a strong alignment between performance and compensation determinations (specifically STI awards), executive performance scorecards were developed and introduced for each of the NEOs relative to comparable executives employed by members of the peer group (in all cases using 2016for performance year compensation awards) were as follows:

TDC for Messrs. Wilmers, Jones (as Vice Chairman), King, Gold (as Vice Chairman) and Pearson was in the bottom quartile; and

TDC for Ms. Meister was approximately at the 75th percentile.

34


After the appointments of Mr. Jones to the position of Chairman and CEO and Mr. Gold to the position of President and COO, the NCG Committee reviewed the benchmarking analysis previously prepared by McLagan relative to these new positions and made the pay determinations as outlined below. Based on this information, TDC for Messrs. Jones and Gold was in the bottom quartile for their respective new roles.

We2023. The executive performance scorecards provide a brief explanation of the factors usedconsistent framework to determine each component of the NEOs’ compensation in the sections that follow.

Consideration of Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

The NCG Committee views the shareholder vote on executive compensation as an important expression of whether its shareholders agree with the NCG Committee’s decisions on aligning compensation withmeasure company, business unit/function and individual performance particularly long-term performance.  In connection with the shareholder advisory vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, 97.91% of the shares that were voted on that matter approved of the compensation of the NEOs.  The NCG Committee considered this to be a strong indication that other shareholders believe that the NEOs’ compensation is aligned with the performance of M&T.

2017 Compensation Determinations

Factors Considered in Making Determinations

The NCG Committee has traditionally based its compensation decisions onagainst established quantitative and qualitative measures, including net income, EPS, returnmetrics. In addition, all performance is reviewed in the context of the company’s and the business unit/functional area’s risk appetite. The CRO provides a bankwide and business unit/function specific risk adherence score that was taken into consideration when finalizing performance ratings and the resulting STI awards.

46

LOGO


Below is an illustration of how the executive performance scorecards are structured and what factors/metrics are considered with corresponding weightings. Company performance (strategic imperatives and achievement against operating plan), Business Line/Functional performance (Growth, Profits, Returns, Customer Experience (“CX”) and Employee Experience (“EX”)) and Individual performance (primarily Leadership and Risk Management Outcomes) are all considered in the short-term incentive award determination.

LOGO

Market Analysis. The C&HC Committee reviews an estimated market pay range for each NEO role. Ranges are developed based on assets, various capital ratios, compositionpublic information and third-party market surveys of earnings, asset quality relativecompensation for the same or comparable roles at peer firms. This practice is designed to ensure that our NEO pay appropriately reflects market pay, based on varying levels of performance. On a TDC basis when compared to the banking industry, responsiveness to the economic environment, achievementCEOs at our compensation peer group of business plans, and TSR.  The NCG Committee assessed the performance of each NEO in lightfirms, Mr. Jones is positioned below, but within a competitive range of the business plan, risk management50th percentile. The C&HC Committee determined that all of our other NEOs were appropriately positioned in the range of our peer group compensation data based on tenure in the role and adherence to risk appetite,performance.

In establishing pay levels for the NEOs, the C&HC Committee considers the various quantitative and relative toqualitative factors set forth in this CD&A in the context of market data, internal equity, the value of the executive’s performance over the long-term, and their future potential with M&T. In addition, the C&HC Committee reviewed the performance of the firms inNEOs against the peer group, the details of which are set forth under the heading “Individual Performance Assessments.”

The NCG Committee considers a number of factors specific to each executive’s role when determining the amount and mix of compensation to be paid.  These factors are briefly summarized in the table below:executive performance scorecard metrics described above.

 

Executive Officer

LOGO

Factors Included Among NCG Committee Considerations

47


Below is a summary of the annual pay for performance review cycle for the 2023 performance year:

Annual Pay for Performance Cycle

CEOStep

TimingActivities         

The NCG Committee, in consultation with the independent compensation consultant, determines the compensation for the CEO based upon its review1

1st Quarter of various corporate2023

Set Annual Objectives

1.  Quantitative – 2023 Operating Plan

• Bank-wide goals

• Business-unit specific goals

2.  Qualitative – 2023 Strategic Imperatives

• Differentiate our customer experience

• Grow new customers / develop new markets

• Drive operational effectiveness

• Optimize our risk management infrastructure

• Be a talent and people driven organization

3.  Cascade objectives consisting primarily of management’s annual business plan, which is approved by the Board of Directors.to each Executive Officer

4.  Distribute executive performance scorecards to Executive Officers

NEOs other than the

CEO2

Recommendations

2nd Quarter of 2023

Succession Planning

1.  Joint meeting between the CEOC&HC Committee and the PresidentN&G Committee to review succession plans for executive leadership roles, including Chief Executive Officer, and other applicable members of Management Group, in consultation with the independent compensation consultant, and an assessment of individual performance.key positions

All NEOs3

3rd Quarter of 2023

Establish Peer Group (as advised by McLagan)

 

Financial performance of M&T (on1.  Review and update peer group to be used as a “net operating” basis, as defined by M&T) over the most recent fiscal yearreference for executive officer compensation and prior years;Board compensation

Achievement4

4th Quarter of M&T, compared to its corporate,2023

Preliminary Review and Discussion of NEO and Other Executive Officer Competitive Market Data

1.  Review of 2023 Financial Performance including relative performance on key financial strategicmetrics

2.  Review 2023 Risk Management Assessment

3.  Review current compensation market position based on peer market data (as advised by McLagan)

5

4th Quarter of 2023

Assess Performance Against the Quantitative and operational objectivesQualitative Objectives Described Above for NEOs and business plans,Other Executive Officers

1.  Evaluate performance

• C&HC Committee rates CEO’s performance

• C&HC Committee and compared tothe CEO evaluate and rate the performance of the peer group firms;other Executive Officers based on performance appraisals and executive performance scorecard results

2.  Quantitative and qualitative performance is assessed based on executive performance scorecards

Cumulative shareholder return;

Performance relative6

1st Quarter of 2024

Link Pay to risk management objectives;Performance

1.  Finalize performance evaluations for NEOs and other Executive Officers

2.  Determine final total compensation, mix of pay and specific pay actions

• 2024 Base Salary

• 2023 STI (Paid in 2024 for 2023 Performance)

• 2024 LTI (Granted in 2024 for 2023 Performance)

48

Compensation of comparable executives at the peer group firms.

LOGO

35


Individual Performance Assessments

Robert G. Wilmers

Chairman

Chief Executive Officer

(through 12/16/2017) 

As Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Wilmers was responsible for M&T’s overall financial performance. M&T achieved its annual business plan for 2017. Mr. Wilmers’ continued focus on, and accountability to M&T’s key priorities has allowed M&T to continue to invest in its employees and optimize its business model, setting the stage for continued growth and success. In 2017, Mr. Wilmers signed the CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge, signaling M&T’s commitment to foster an inclusive environment for all employees.

René F. Jones

Chairman

Chief Executive Officer

(appointed 12/20/2017)

While serving as Vice Chairman in 2017, Mr. Jones’ oversight responsibilities included M&T’s Wealth and Institutional Services, Treasury and Human Resources divisions. Under his leadership, these divisions made significant investments in key infrastructure projects that will support future strategic initiatives. Mr. Jones also provided strategic guidance and support for M&T’s CCAR submission as well as for technology, systems and processes to streamline M&T’s financial reporting, risk and compliance infrastructure. Mr. Jones was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer on December 20, 2017.

Darren J. King

Executive Vice President

Chief Financial Officer

In his first full year as Chief Financial Officer, Mr. King oversaw M&T’s continued growth (compared to peers) in net income and earnings per share. Under his leadership, M&T received a non-objection to its 2017 capital plan from the Federal Reserve.

Richard S. Gold

President

Chief Operating Officer

(appointed 12/20/2017)

While serving as Vice Chairman and Chief Risk Officer, Mr. Gold oversaw the buildout of M&T’s risk management infrastructure including the successful completion of all requirements of the Federal Reserve’s Written Agreement, which was terminated in July 2017. In April, Mr. Gold moved out of the role of CRO and expanded his oversight responsibilities to include the Business Banking, Retail Banking, Mortgage and Consumer Lending, Marketing and Legal divisions. Mr. Gold was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer on December 20, 2017.

Kevin J. Pearson

Executive Vice President

Vice Chairman – M&T Bank

While serving as Vice Chairman in 2017, Mr. Pearson’s oversight responsibilities included M&T’s Commercial Banking business, Credit, Technology and Banking Operation divisions. Under his leadership, M&T maintained its strong credit quality in 2017 and the Credit, Technology and Banking Operations divisions made significant enhancements to infrastructure and optimized critical processes.  


36


Doris P. Meister

Executive Vice President

Wealth Management

As Executive Vice President, Ms. Meister maintains overall responsibility for M&T’s Wealth Management businesses. Under her leadership, a strong senior leadership team was assembled to position the division for continued success and the division took critical foundational steps to bring together separate organizational units to position the division for enhanced profitability.

2023 NEO Compensation Elements

Base Salary

Salary. The NCGC&HC Committee made 20172023 base salary determinations for the NEOs in January 2017.2023, with the exception of Mr. Bible, whose compensation was established by the C&HC Committee in December 2022, in expectation of his commencement of employment in the second quarter of 2023. At that time, given M&T’s performance in 2016 compared to both that of the peer group and its business plan and the individual performance of each of the NEOs and their respective positioning against competitive market data for their roles, the NCGC&HC Committee determined that the base salaries for the NEOsMessrs. Jones and King should be as follows:increased to continue to approach the median of market, while the remaining NEOs were deemed to be well positioned compared to market.

 

Named Executive Officer

2017 Base Salary

 

2016 Base Salary

 

 

Percentage

Change

 

  2023 Base Salary(1) ($)   Percentage Change from
2022 Base Salary
 

Robert G. Wilmers

$

975,000

 

$

950,000

 

 

 

2.6

%

René F. Jones

$

745,000

 

$

725,000

 

 

 

2.8

%

   1,100,000    10.0

Daryl N. Bible

   740,000    n/a 

Darren J. King

$

650,000

 

$

600,000

 

 

 

8.3

%

   700,000    2.2

Richard S. Gold

$

745,000

 

$

725,000

 

 

 

2.8

%

Kevin J. Pearson

$

745,000

 

$

725,000

 

 

 

2.8

%

   775,000    0.0

Christopher E. Kay

   725,000    0.0

Doris P. Meister

$

800,000

 

$

-

 

(1)

-

 

   800,000    0.0

(1)

(1)

Ms. Meister was not an NEO in 2016.Base salaries listed are full year salaries, and Mr. Bible’s employment began on June 1, 2023.

Annual Cash IncentivesVariable Compensation. M&T maintains a performance-guided discretionary approach to its incentive programs. While we aim to deliver TDC in a competitive range around the median of the market for our peer group, we do not use formulas for determining performance year incentives. Instead, individual target award levels are derived using various factors including competitive market pay ranges, time in job and strategic importance of a given role to the organization. As described above, the C&HC Committee performs a holistic, balanced performance assessment of company, business unit/function and individual performance that considers quantitative and qualitative factors, market compensation levels by role, and internal equity.

The NEOs participateintroduction of executive performance scorecards in annual cash2023 further strengthened the link between company, business unit/function and individual performance and compensation determinations. These executive performance scorecards provide a framework to assess performance across the various positions each NEO holds and provides additional structure to apply rigor around incentive plans that provide for discretionary grantscompensation recommendations. Results of cash awardsthe executive performance scorecards were presented to the NEOs as determined byC&HC Committee and were reviewed in conjunction with written performance appraisals to provide a holistic view of each NEO’s performance. Additional support was provided from the NCG Committee. Due toCRO in assessing the discretionary structure of the plans, the NEOs do not have, and historically have not had, target levels of awards or stated goals and payout levels under those plans.risk adherence for each business unit/function. Consequently, the NCGC&HC Committee considered the following factors in making the award determinations in January 20182024 for 20172023 performance:

the performance of M&T during 20172023 relative to its businessoperating plan and relative to the financial peer group used forgroup;

achievement of key strategic objectives and goals set in Q1 of the performance purposes;year;

the leadership and contribution of each of the NEOs to that performance;

the performance of the business unit/function which each NEO has oversight;

effective risk management and adherence to M&T’s risk appetite statement; and

compensation peer group market data for the roles occupied by each of the NEOs; andNEOs.

effective risk management and adherence to M&T’s risk appetite statement.

37


Short-term (Cash) Incentive Compensation. Based upon thesethe performance factors described above, as well as relevant market compensation information, the NCGC&HC Committee determined that it was appropriate to award eachfund the STI pool at 90% of the NEOstarget (with target reflecting a cash incentive for 2017 performance as follows:  fully funded pool).

 

Named Executive Officer

Bonus Paid in 2018

for 2017 Performance(1)

 

Bonus Paid in 2017

for 2016 Performance

 

 

Percentage

Change

 

Robert G. Wilmers

$

600,000

 

$

340,000

 

 

 

76.5

%

René F. Jones

$

1,100,000

 

$

380,000

 

 

 

189.5

%

Darren J. King

$

530,000

 

$

400,000

 

 

 

32.5

%

Richard S. Gold

$

755,000

 

$

380,000

 

 

 

98.7

%

Kevin J. Pearson

$

755,000

 

$

400,000

 

 

 

88.8

%

Doris P. Meister

$

450,000

 

$

-

 

(2)

-

 

 

(1)LOGO

Notwithstanding M&T’s moderately strong financial performance in 2016, incentive compensation pools for 2016 were reduced due to elevated expenses. The decision was made to have executives bear the burden of these reductions.  Therefore, bonuses paid to each NEO in 2018, when compared to bonuses paid in 2017, reflect an increase resulting from restoration of the incentive pools to previous levels which can be attributed to an increase in 2017 performance.

49

(2)

Ms. Meister was not an NEO in 2016.

Equity-Based Incentives


Applying the executive performance scorecard results, including individual performance ratings, the C&HC Committee consequently set the amount of STI awards to each NEO for the 2023 performance year as follows:

Also consistent

Named Executive Officer

  2023 STI ($)   Percentage Change
from 2022 STI
 

René F. Jones

   2,150,000    -10

Daryl N. Bible

   750,000    n/a 

Darren J. King

   1,350,000    23

Kevin J. Pearson

   1,300,000    -13

Christopher E. Kay

   950,000    -5

Doris P. Meister

   750,000    -21

Long-term (Equity-based) Incentive Compensation. Consistent with itsour philosophy of linking compensation to M&T’s performance for the benefit ofcontinued alignment with M&T’s shareholders, M&T provides long-term incentive opportunitiesa substantial portion (60% to its executive officers71%) of 2022 performance year variable compensation was awarded to NEOs through discretionaryLTI grants of equity-based compensationin January 2023 under the 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan.Plan, excluding Mr. Bible, as he was not employed at the time of the 2023 LTI grant. The NCGC&HC Committee determinesestablished the LTI compensation mix to maximize shareholder value and tie the NEOs’ compensation to M&T’s long-term performance. The NEO LTI mix awarded in January 2023 based upon 2022 performance was 40% Performance Hurdled Stock Units (PHSUs), 40% Performance Vested Stock Units (PVSUs) and 20% Non-Qualified Stock Options (NQ Stock Options or stock options). All of the LTI awards are fully at risk as stock options are worthless without stock appreciation and the PHSUs are subject to annual performance hurdles with no downside protection (i.e., they vest at target or not at all). Going forward, M&T will continue to monitor, evaluate, and modify this program as deemed necessary to ensure continued evolution in line with our business strategy and compensation philosophy.

The C&HC Committee determined the dollar value of equitythe LTI awards to be made to the NEOs at its meeting in January of each year.2023. Following that meeting, the 2022 performance year equity awards arewere granted on January 31, 2023. In light of a gap to competitive market positioning, the last business dayC&HC Committee determined that an increase in the dollar value of January.  In grantingthe LTI awards to be awarded for 2022 performance was warranted for all NEOs.

Named Executive Officer(1)

  2022 Performance
Year LTI Awards
(2023 Grant)
($)
   2022
Performance
Year Options
(20%) ($)
   2022
Performance
Year PHSUs
(40%) ($)
   2022
Performance
Year PVSUs
(40%) ($)
 

René F. Jones

   6,000,000    1,200,000    2,400,000    2,400,000 

Darren J. King

   2,000,000    400,000    800,000    800,000 

Kevin J. Pearson

   2,500,000    500,000    1,000,000    1,000,000 

Christopher E. Kay

   1,475,000    295,000    590,000    590,000 

Doris P. Meister

   1,750,000    350,000    700,000    700,000 

(1)

Mr. Bible was not yet employed by M&T at the time of these grants.

PHSUs. PHSUs are utilized as a retention vehicle and were granted as part of equity awards, the NCG Committee generally assessesLTI mix in January 2023 for the following factors:

2022 plan year, consistent with prior years. PHSUs vest ratably at target each year over three years based on achievement of an absolute ROTCE safety and soundness performance hurdle for each year, which has been established at 5%. If the performance hurdle is not satisfied for a given year, the portion of the stock award that is scheduled to vest on the vesting date immediately following that annual performance period will not vest and will be forfeited unless otherwise determined by the C&HC Committee. Any dividend equivalents credited during the annual performance period are accrued and paid in cash to the extent the PHSUs vest and are distributed.

50

LOGO


2021-2023 PHSU Award Payouts.At the conclusion of the annual performance period for the PHSU grants made in 2021, 2022 and 2023, the company’s ROTCE was calculated to be 17.6%, which was above the absolute threshold required for each tranche to vest and pay out at target (100%). The C&HC Committee certified the payout at its meeting in January 2024. See Appendix A for a description of how ROTCE is calculated.

Named Executive Officer(1)

    Grant Date   Target Award    Distributed Performance Adjusted Shares 

René F. Jones

     1/29/21   4,278     4,278 
      1/31/22   3,129     3,129 
      1/31/23   5,128     5,128 

Darren J. King

     1/29/21   1,405     1,405 
      1/31/22   827     827 
      1/31/23   1,709     1,709 

Kevin J. Pearson

     1/29/21   2,328     2,328 
      1/31/22   1,417     1,417 
      1/31/23   2,136     2,136 

Christopher E. Kay

     1/29/21   1,888     1,888 
      1/31/22   768     768 
      1/31/23   1,260     1,260 

Doris P. Meister

     1/29/21   1,168     1,168 
      1/31/22   685     685 
      1/31/23   1,495     1,495 

(1)

Mr. Bible did not receive a grant of PHSUs in 2021, 2022 or 2023 as he was not yet employed by M&T at the time of these grants.

PVSUs. The C&HC Committee also grants PVSUs, which cliff vest after three years based on absolute and relative average ROTCE performance over the three-year performance period, with final payout values ranging from 0% to 150% of target. In addition, the PVSUs have accrued reinvested dividend equivalent units, which will pay out at the time the underlying shares vest and are subject to the same performance payout percentage.

PVSU Performance Metrics(1)  Absolute
ROTCE
  Payout  Relative
ROTCE
  Payout(2)
Above Absolute Maximum – payout is 150% regardless of relative performance  ≥17%  150%  N/A  150%
     
Performance between these two Absolute ROTCE levels is assessed relative to the peer group  5% to < 17%  Payout by relative ROTCE Scale  

>75th %’ile

50th %’ile

25th %’ile

<25th %’ile

  150%

100%

75%

50%

Below Absolute Threshold – payout is zero, regardless of relative performance  < 5%  0%  N/A  0%

(1)

See Appendix A for a description of how ROTCE is calculated and a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with corresponding non-GAAP amounts.

(2)

For performance between the 25th and 75th percentiles, payout will be determined based on straight-line interpolation.

LOGO

51


2021-2023 PVSU Award Payout. At the conclusion of the three-year performance period for the 2021 PVSU grant, the company’s three-year average ROTCE was calculated to be 17.0%, which yielded a 150% payout. The C&HC Committee certified the payout at its meeting in February 2024. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with corresponding non-GAAP amounts for the 2021-2023 ROTCE calculations.

Year

    ROTCE(1) (%)     Earn out (%) 
   

2021

     16.8        
   

2022

     16.7        
   

2023

     17.6        
   

Three-Year Avg.

     17.0      150

(1)

See Appendix A for a description of how ROTCE is calculated and a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with corresponding non-GAAP amounts.

Named Executive Officer(1)

  2021 Target Award   Distributed Performance Adjusted Shares(2) 
   

René F. Jones

   12,834    21,284 
   

Darren J. King

   4,213    6,986 
   

Kevin J. Pearson

   6,982    11,579 
   

Doris P. Meister

   3,503    5,809 

(1)

Messrs. Bible and Kay did not receive a grant of PVSUs in 2021.

(2)

Earned PVSUs includes payout of underlying Dividend Equivalent Units (DEUs). The DEUs are also subject to the same earnout percentage of 150% as approved by the C&HC Committee. The earned DEUs for the NEOs are as follows: Mr. Jones 2,033, Mr. King 667, Mr. Pearson 1,106 and Ms. Meister 554.

Stock Options. M&T relative to prior years; and

the performance of M&T for the immediately preceding year relative to its business plan and the peer group used for performance purposes.

M&T reintroduced stock options for senior managers, including the NEOs, in 2018 and gavealso awards a portion of their 2018 equity awardthe 2022 performance year LTI awards in the form of stock options. Prior to 2007,Stock options align our NEOs’ interests with those of shareholders by providing value only if M&T primarily granted&T’s stock price increases from the date that the stock option is granted. In addition, the vesting schedule for the stock options as its long term incentive vehicle.  Since enteringpromotes retention of our NEOs. The stock option awards granted to the Troubled Asset Relief ProgramNEOs in 2009, M&T has used time- and performance-based restricted shares or units.  While there has been a shift away from the predominance of stock optionsJanuary 2023 for 2022 performance vest ratably over the last ten years, particularly in the financial services industry, they continue to play an important, albeit smaller, role in a balanced long-term incentive portfolio. M&T believes stockthree years. Stock options create close alignment with shareholder experience, and due to their ten-year term, support theM&T’s business strategy and compensation philosophy by providing a link to long-term business objectives and sustained long-term value creation.

2024 Long-Term Incentive Grant.

PSUs were also granted in 2018, consistent with prior years,Each year the C&HC Committee evaluates the LTI mix to maintain competitiveness, drive appropriate behaviors and representalign the remaining portioninterests of NEO equity awards.  M&T believes PSUs alignour executives with M&T’s long-term performance. To further strengthen the goallink between company performance and executive compensation, in 2023 the C&HC Committee increased the percentage of sustained long-term shareholder value, while at the same time serving as a retention tool.

38


In summary, the equity awardsaward granted to the NEOs on January 31, 2018 were in the form of PVSUs and decreased the other two vehicles. The NEO LTI mix awarded in January 2024 based upon 2023 performance was:

50% Performance-Vested Stock Units

35% Performance-Hurdled Stock Units

15% Non-Qualified Stock Options

Named Executive Officer(1)

 2023 Performance
Year LTI Awards
(2024 Grant)
($)
  Percentage
Change from
2022
Performance
Year LTI
  2023
Performance
Year Options
(15%) ($)
  2023
Performance
Year PHSUs
(35%) ($)
  2023
Performance
Year PVSUs
(50%) ($)
 

René F. Jones

  6,000,000   0  900,000   2,100,000   3,000,000 

Daryl N. Bible

  2,125,000   n/a   318,750   743,750   1,062,500 

Darren J. King

  2,200,000   10  330,000   770,000   1,100,000 

Kevin J. Pearson

  2,500,000   0  375,000   875,000   1,250,000 

Christopher E. Kay

  1,500,000   2  225,000   525,000   750,000 

(1)

Ms. Meister did not receive a 2024 LTI grant in light of her upcoming transition to a consulting role.

52

LOGO


2024 PVSUs. The C&HC Committee approved a plan design change for the PVSUs granted in 2024. This updated plan maintains a three-year cliff vesting schedule, but now includes two metrics – ROTCE and Return on Tangible Assets (“ROTA”). Both metrics are weighted equally (50% each) and both take into consideration the three-year average performance on an absolute and relative basis. Final payout values range from 0% to 150% of target. In addition, the updated PVSU design maintains the accrued reinvested dividend equivalent units, which will payout at the time the underlying shares vest and are subject to the same performance payout percentage.

   PVSU Performance Metric 1  Absolute
ROTCE
  Payout  Relative
ROTCE
  Payout(2)

Metric 1:

ROTCE(1)

 

50% weighting

 Above Absolute Maximum – payout is 150% regardless of relative performance  ≥17%  150%  N/A  150%
 Performance between these two Absolute ROTCE levels is assessed relative to the peer group  5% to < 17%  Payout by relative ROTCE Scale  

>75th %’ile

50th %’ile

25th %’ile

<25th %’ile

  150%

100%

75%

50%

 Below Absolute Threshold – payout is zero, regardless of relative performance  < 5%  0%  N/A  0%

(1)

See Appendix A for a description of how ROTCE is calculated.

(2)

For performance between the 25th and 75th percentiles, payout will be determined based on straight-line interpolation.

   PVSU Performance Metric 2  Absolute
ROTA
  Payout  Relative
ROTA
  Payout(2)

Metric 2:

ROTA(1)

 

50% weighting

 Above Absolute Maximum – payout is 150% regardless of relative performance  ≥1.25%  150%  N/A  150%
 Performance between these two Absolute ROTA levels is assessed relative to the peer group  0.35% to < 1.25%  Payout by relative ROTA Scale  

>75th %’ile

50th %’ile

25th %’ile

<25th %’ile

  150%

100%

75%

50%

 Below Absolute Threshold – payout is zero, regardless of relative performance  < 0.35%  0%  N/A  0%

(1)

See Appendix A for a description of how ROTA is calculated.

(2)

For performance between the 25th and 75th percentiles, payout will be determined based on straight-line interpolation.

LOGO

53


Individual Performance Assessments

The C&HC Committee assessed the performance of each NEO based on the factors described in the “Process for Determining 2023 NEO Compensation” section above, and against our 2023 strategic imperatives, as well as each NEO’s individual performance goals, as more fully described below. In addition, the C&HC Committee also considers market-competitive compensation levels in determining each NEO’s TDC.

René F. Jones

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

LOGO

Mr. Jones completed his sixth year as Chairman and CEO in 2023. The C&HC Committee established Mr. Jones’ TDC based on the company’s performance relative to peers and our 2023 Operating Plan (including metrics that were missed), as well as progress toward our long-term strategic objectives. Specifically, the C&HC Committee considered the following performance factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Mr. Jones’ TDC:

• Business results/shareholder return

¡  Diluted EPS was $15.79, up 37% from $11.53 in 2022

¡  Operating EPS* was $16.08, up 12% from $14.42 in 2022

¡  Return on Average Tangible Assets* was 1.42%, up from 1.35% in 2022

¡  GAAP-basis net income totaled $2.74 billion, up from $1.99 billion in 2022

¡  Increased quarterly common stock dividend per share 8% during 2023 from $1.20 to $1.30, representing the 7th year of consecutive increases

¡  Notwithstanding strong performance relative to peer group, performance on diluted net operating earnings per common share, net operating return on average tangible assets, and net operating return on average tangible common equity were below Operating Plan

• Optimizing use of resources/increasing resiliency

¡  Established workstreams to optimize community bank coverage, enterprise contact and enterprise operations

¡  Enhanced system resiliency including continued improvements in cybersecurity

• Risk management

¡  Executed Commercial Bank’s strategy

¡  Made significant talent investment in second- and third-line risk capabilities

¡  Successfully divested from two businesses to align portfolio with the bank’s risk profile

¡  Company continues to operate within its established risk appetite parameters as affirmed by the Risk Committee of the Board

• Strategic partnerships

¡  Serves on Federal Reserve Bank of New York Board of Directors for three-year term ending December 31, 2024

¡  Serves on the Board (Vice Chair) of the Bank Policy Institute

54

LOGO


• Talent
¡  Concluded year one of internal sponsorship program to
strengthen pipeline of diverse leaders
¡  Continued focus on succession plans to support continuity
and increase diversity
¡  Continued to mature our pay-for-performance practice and
culture
*  See “Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in the 2023 Form 10-K for
a reconciliation GAAP amounts with these corresponding
non-GAAP amounts

   Performance Year 
       2022         2023    

Salary

  $1,000,000   $1,100,000 

STI Payout

  $2,400,000   $2,150,000 

NQ Stock Options 

  $1,200,000   $900,000 

PHSUs(1)

  $2,400,000   $2,100,000 

PVSUs(2)

  $2,400,000   $3,000,000 

LTI Grant 

  $6,000,000   $6,000,000 

Total Direct Compensation

  $9,400,000   $9,250,000 

(1) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout dependent on achievement of performance hurdle.

(2) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

Linking 2023 CEO Pay Elements to Performance

Over 88% variable pay for the 2023 performance year

Over 65% of variable pay is equity-based deferred LTI subject to multi-year vesting and forfeiture to align shareholder and executive interests

NQ Stock Options vest ratably over three years and provide value only if M&T’s stock price increases from the date that the options are granted

PHSUs vest ratably over three years and PSUs. Theare earned based on achievement of an absolute ROTCE performance hurdle each year

PVSUs are earned only to the extent M&T performance is achieved against absolute and relative average ROTCE and ROTA over a three-year period

LOGO

55


Daryl Bible

Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

LOGO

In addition to the 2023 performance
year compensation that was delivered to
Mr. Bible, upon his joining of M&T,
Mr. Bible received a cash bonus of
$500,000 (less taxes) which will be
forfeitable by Mr. Bible should he
separate from M&T within one year, and
an award of restricted stock units valued
at $2,500,000, which will vest ratably
over three years subject to continued
employment.

Having joined in June 2023 and served as CFO for the second half of 2023, Mr. Bible brought experienced leadership, guidance and insight into critical corporate performance measurements. Additionally, the C&HC Committee considered the following performance factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Mr. Bible’s TDC:

• Business results/shareholder return

¡  Diluted EPS was $15.79, up 37% from $11.53 in 2022

¡  Operating EPS* was $16.08, up 12% from $14.42 in 2022

¡  Return on Average Tangible Assets* was 1.42%, up from 1.35% in 2022

¡  GAAP-basis net income totaled $2.74 billion, up from $1.99 billion in 2022

¡  Increased quarterly common stock dividend per share 8% during 2023 from $1.20 to $1.30, representing the 7th year of consecutive increases

¡  Notwithstanding strong performance relative to peer group, performance on diluted net operating earnings per common share, net operating return on average tangible assets, and net operating return on average tangible common equity were below Operating Plan

• Enhanced processes and communication

¡  Stood up quarterly regulatory meetings and deepened representation to improve outreach

¡  Improved resource allocation and governance of key enterprise initiatives

• Finance modernization

¡  Brought in experienced talent to accelerate transformation

¡  Worked with Technology and Operations to drive agile ways of working

¡  Enhanced Data Governance Framework, including automation of data risk and controls

• Risk Management

¡  Collaborated with Risk and Line of Businesses to formulate a balanced strategy and targeted objectives for CRE concentration changes

*  See “Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in the 2023 Form 10-K for a reconciliation GAAP amounts with these corresponding non-GAAP amounts

   Performance Year(1) 
    

 Target Comp 

2023

   

 Actual Comp 

2023(2)

 

Salary

  $740,000   $418,385 

STI Payout

  $1,200,000   $750,000 

NQ Stock Options 

  $318,750   $318,750 

PHSUs(3)

  $743,750   $743,750 

PVSUs(4)

  $1,062,500   $1,062,500 

LTI Grant 

  $2,125,000   $2,125,000 

Total Direct Compensation

  $4,065,000   $3,293,385 

(1) Mr. Bible’s 2022 Performance Compensation is not listed as he was not employed for the 2022 performance year.

(2) Represents a pro-rated base salary due to Mr. Bible’s mid-year start date.

(3) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout dependent upon achievement of performance hurdle.

(4) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

56

LOGO


Darren J. King

Senior Executive Vice President and Co-Head of Businesses

LOGO

As CFO for the first half of 2023, Mr. King directed the company’s strong financial performance. Upon assuming leadership of our Consumer Bank portfolio, Mr. King led continued strong results in the Retail, Business Banking, Mortgage Banking and Dealer Services businesses. For the 2023 performance year, the C&HC Committee considered the mixed results of the portfolio of businesses he oversees and the following performance factors, including an expanded role (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Mr. King’s TDC:

• Business results/shareholder return

¡  Diluted EPS was $15.79, up 37% from $11.53 in 2022

¡  Operating EPS* was $16.08, up 12% from $14.42 in 2022

¡  Return on Average Tangible Assets* was 1.42%, up from 1.35% in 2022

¡  GAAP-basis net income totaled $2.74 billion, up from $1.99 billion in 2022

¡  Increased quarterly common stock dividend per share 8% during 2023 from $1.20 to $1.30, representing the 7th year of consecutive increases

¡  In addition, our Retail business saw year-over-year increases in Net Customer Growth, Revenue Growth, Net Income, as well as on ROTCE

¡  Notwithstanding strong performance relative to peer group, performance on diluted net operating earnings per common share, net operating return on average tangible assets, and net operating return on average tangible common equity were below Operating Plan

• Risk management

¡  Maintained and enhanced controls to ensure accuracy in SEC/Reg reporting

¡  Organized and led cross-business unit calls during market liquidity events, overseeing changes designed to preserve (then grow) our diverse deposit base

• Successful transition

¡  Facilitated seamless transition to new CFO, including joint meetings with analysts and investors to maintain continuity

¡  Partnered with Mr. Pearson to jointly lead entire business portfolio in alignment with the bank’s strategic priorities

*  See “Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in the 2023 Form 10-K for a reconciliation GAAP amounts with these corresponding non-GAAP amounts

   Performance Year 
       2022         2023    

Salary

  $685,000   $700,000 

STI Payout

  $1,100,000   $1,350,000 

NQ Stock Options 

  $400,000   $330,000 

PHSUs(1)

  $800,000   $770,000 

PVSUs(2)

  $800,000   $1,100,000 

LTI Grant 

  $2,000,000   $2,200,000 

Total Direct Compensation

  $3,785,000   $4,250,000 

(1) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout dependent on achievement of performance hurdle.

(2) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

LOGO

57


Kevin J. Pearson

Vice Chairman and Co-Head of Businesses

LOGO

Mr. Pearson has overall responsibility for M&T’s Commercial Bank, as well as our Wealth and Institutional Client Services divisions under the Wilmington Trust brand. For performance year 2023, the C&HC Committee considered the mixed results of the portfolio of businesses he oversees and the following performance factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing his TDC:

• Business results/shareholder return

¡  Diluted EPS was $15.79, up 37% from $11.53 in 2022

¡  Operating EPS* was $16.08, up 12% from $14.42 in 2022

¡  Return on Average Tangible Assets* was 1.42%, up from 1.35% in 2022

¡  GAAP-basis net income totaled $2.74 billion, up from $1.99 billion in 2022

¡  Increased quarterly common stock dividend per share 8% during 2023 from $1.20 to $1.30, representing the 7th year of consecutive increases

¡  In addition, revenue growth for Commercial, Wealth and Institutional Client Services divisions each increased year-over-year

¡  Notwithstanding strong performance relative to peer group, performance on diluted net operating earnings per common share, net operating return on average tangible assets, and net operating return on average tangible common equity were below Operating Plan

• Risk Management

¡  Executed Commercial Bank’s strategy

¡  Mobilized resources to accelerate transformation of the Bank’s commercial credit administration processes

• Talent

¡  Supported executive level hires and moves to improve resiliency and operational effectiveness of the Commercial Bank

¡  Partnered with Mr. King to jointly lead all businesses in alignment with bank priorities

*  See “Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in the 2023 Form 10-K for a reconciliation GAAP amounts with these corresponding non-GAAP amounts

   Performance Year 
       2022         2023    

Salary

  $775,000   $775,000 

STI Payout

  $1,500,000   $1,300,000 

NQ Stock Options 

  $500,000   $375,000 

PHSUs(1)

  $1,000,000   $875,000 

PVSUs(2)

  $1,000,000   $1,250,000 

LTI Grant 

  $2,500,000   $2,500,000 

Total Direct Compensation

  $4,775,000   $4,575,000 

(1) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout dependent upon achievement of performance hurdle.

(2) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

58

LOGO


Christopher E. Kay

Senior Executive Vice President and Head of Enterprise Platforms

LOGO

Mr. Kay assumed responsibility as the head of the company’s Enterprise Platforms in June 2023, focusing on accelerating scale in key enterprise functions. At that time, Mr. Kay transitioned responsibility for Consumer, Business Banking and Mortgage. For performance year 2023, the C&HC Committee considered the following performance factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Mr. Kay’s TDC:

• Business Results

¡  Through Q2 2023, increased revenue for the retail portfolio

¡  Managed liquidity daily with real-time adjustments to balance ILST (Internal Liquidity Stress Test) standard levels and estimate short term liquidity risk

¡  Sponsored initiatives to optimize use of resources (revenue and efficiency)

• Talent

¡  Hired and onboarded new head of digital banking; assisted development and execution of the organization’s digital modernization efforts

¡  Sponsored leadership to create and implement durable and flexible operating/technology model with greater customer centricity

• Risk management

¡  Led communications and readiness planning for bank initiatives

¡  Established governance routines to increase transparency

   Performance Year 
       2022         2023    

Salary

  $725,000   $725,000 

STI Payout

  $1,000,000   $950,000 

NQ Stock Options 

  $295,000   $225,000 

PHSUs(1)

  $590,000   $525,000 

PVSUs(2)

  $590,000   $750,000 

LTI Grant 

  $1,475,000   $1,500,000 

Total Direct Compensation

  $3,200,000   $3,175,000 

(1) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout dependent upon achievement of performance hurdle.

(2) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

LOGO

59


Doris P. Meister

Senior Executive Vice President and Head of Wealth Management

For performance year 2023, the C&HC Committee considered the following performance factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Ms. Meister’s TDC:

Business Results

¡

Despite the regional bank crisis in early 2023, the company’s Wealth Management business was able to maintain a client retention score of 97% while Net Promoter Scores improved

¡

Net customer growth and revenue growth were both up year-over-year

¡

Wealth Management missed on its net contribution versus the Operating Plan primarily due to lower net interest income, caused in part by the sharp increase in deposit costs and lower than planned balances

Growth and productivity

¡

Implemented new High Net Worth Growth strategy to further scale the wealth business

¡

Accelerated the cross-sell program with the Commercial Bank, including introducing our largest People’s United commercial clients to our wealth capabilities

¡

Streamlined operating processes, intended to reduce cycle time and improve advisory productivity

¡

Streamlined fiduciary business process and created rapid response team to handle complex trusts

Talent

¡

Externally hired and internally promoted key talent

   Performance Year 
       2023(1)     

Salary

  $800,000 

STI Payout

  $750,000 

LTI Grant(2)

  $0 

Total Direct Compensation

  $1,550,000 

(1) Ms. Meister’s 2022 Performance Compensation is not listed as she was not an NEO for 2022.

(2) Ms. Meister did not receive an LTI grant in 2024 in light of her upcoming transition to a consulting role as described below.

Ms. Meister’s Retirement and Consulting Agreement.On February 9, 2024, M&T and Ms. Meister entered into a Retirement and Consulting Agreement (the “Agreement”) in connection with Ms. Meister’s transition to a consulting role with the company, which will be effective on or about May 31, 2024. In order to ensure a smooth and effective transition of leadership of our wealth management business, pursuant to the Agreement, Ms. Meister will provide consulting services for a period of 24 months from Ms. Meister’s last day of employment. As consideration for her provision of consulting services, Ms. Meister will receive subject to her execution and non-revocation of the Agreement (including a general release therein), as well as her compliance with non-solicitation and non-compete covenants, a monthly consulting fee of $101,666.66.

Ms. Meister’s outstanding equity awards grantedwill vest pursuant to the existing terms of her award agreements with respect to retirement eligibility as follows: (i) all vesting restrictions on January 31, 2017outstanding PHSU awards will lapse; (ii) outstanding PVSU awards remain subject to the company’s actual performance and January 29, 2016 were exclusivelywill be paid on the original schedule for such awards after the applicable performance, and (iii) all NQ Stock Options continue to vest pursuant to their original schedule and the exercise period ends on the earlier of 4 years following retirement or the original 10 year expiration date. In light of her upcoming shift to a consulting role, Ms. Meister did not receive an LTI award in the form of PSUs.2024.

 

Named Executive Officer

2018 Equity Awards(1),(2)

 

2017 Equity Awards

 

Percentage Change 2018 vs. 2017

 

2016 Equity Awards

 

Percentage

Change 2017 vs. 2016

Robert G. Wilmers

$

-

 

$

1,457,000

 

 

0.0

%

$

1,675,000

 

 

-13.0

%

 

René F. Jones

$

2,500,000

 

$

1,044,000

 

 

139.5

%

$

1,200,000

 

 

-13.0

%

 

Darren J. King

$

900,000

 

$

750,000

 

 

20.0

%

$

750,000

 

 

0.0

%

 

Richard S. Gold

$

1,500,000

 

$

1,044,000

 

 

43.7

%

$

1,200,000

 

 

-13.0

%

 

Kevin J. Pearson

$

1,500,000

 

$

1,109,000

 

 

35.3

%

$

1,275,000

 

 

-13.0

%

 

Doris P. Meister

$

1,000,000

 

$

871,000

 

 

14.8

%

$

-

 

 

0.0

%

(3)

60

 

(1)

The 2018 Equity Awards were split between PSUs and stock options as follows:  Mr. Jones - $1,875,000 in PSUs and $625,000 in stock options; Mr. King - $675,000 in PSUs and $225,000 in stock options; Mr. Gold - $1,125,000 in PSUs and $375,000 in stock options; Mr. Pearson - $1,125,000 in PSUs and $375,000 in stock options; Ms. Meister - $750,000 in PSUs and $250,000 in stock options.

LOGO

(2)

Notwithstanding M&T’s moderately strong financial performance in 2016, equity compensation pools for 2016 were reduced due to elevated expenses. The decision was made to have executives bear the burden of these reductions.  Therefore, equity awarded to each NEO in 2018, when compared to equity awarded in 2017, reflects an increase resulting from restoration of the equity compensation pools to previous levels which can be attributed to an increase in 2017 performance.

(3)

Ms. Meister was not an NEO in 2016.

Perquisites

Generally, M&T provides limited perquisites to its NEOs.  The perquisites that are provided are designed to assist NEOs in being productive and are limited to those that management and the NCG Committee believe are consistent with M&T’s overall compensation philosophy.  Given the importance of developing business relationships for M&T’s success, the NEOs are reimbursed for certain initiation fees and dues they incur for club memberships deemed advisable for business purposes, tax preparation, parking, meals and executive physical examinations.


Retirement and Other Benefits

M&T maintains two tax-qualified retirement plans for its employees, one a defined benefit plan and the other a defined contribution plan. Each of the NEOsMr. Pearson participates in the defined benefit plan except forand continues to receive benefit accruals. Messrs. Jones and King who have elected to have their benefitbenefits accrued under the defined contribution plan. Messrs. Jones and KingThis election was made this election pursuant to a one-time election that was offered to all participants in the defined benefit plan in late 2005 to either (i) remain an active participant in the defined benefit plan and earn future benefits under a new reduced benefit formula or to(ii) retain the frozen benefit in the defined benefit plan and earn future benefits under a new defined contribution plan formula beginning January 1, 2006. Ms. Meister and Messrs. Kay and Bible are not eligible to participate in the defined benefit plan and are participants in the defined contribution plan.

In addition, M&T maintains nonqualified defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans to supplement retirement benefits for the NEOs in order to make up for benefits that cannot otherwise be provided in the qualified planplans due to Internal Revenue ServiceCode limits; however, total compensation recognized for thisthe purpose of these plans is capped at $350,000.two times the annual Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit. The nonqualified plans are not funded, except as benefits are actually paid to executive officers upon retirement.retirement or such other date elected by the executive. Additional information regarding these retirement plans and arrangements is provided in the sections titled “Pension Benefits”Pension Benefits and “NonqualifiedNonqualified Deferred Compensation.Compensation.

39


M&T does not believe it is appropriate to provide the NEOs with severance packages beyond what is provided to employees of M&T, generally. Consequently, the NEOs have historically participated in the M&T Bank Corporation Employee Severance Pay Plan (“Severance Pay Plan”), which provides for post-employment severance payments that are tiered based upon an employee’s position and years of service, and the continuation of certain employee benefits. Upon a “Qualifying Event” (defined in the Severance Pay Plan as any permanent, involuntary termination of a participant’s active employment as a result of a reduction in force, restructuring, outsourcing or elimination of position), ana NEO would be entitled to benefits under the Severance Pay Plan.

Other than benefits that are generally available to our employees, M&T does not maintain any individual executive severance or change-in-controlchange in control arrangements. M&T’s compensation plans do not contain payments or benefits to NEOs that are specifically triggered by a change-in-control,change in control, except that M&T’sthe 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan provides that, upon a change-in-control,change in control, all employees, including the NEOs, would become fully vested in any outstanding awards that were not already vested. M&T has elected to provide such acceleration because of a belief that the principal purpose of providing executive officers and other employees with equity incentives is to align their interests with those of M&T’s shareholders and that this alignment should be enhanced, not weakened, in the context of a change-in-control.change in control. Accelerating the vesting of equity-based compensation upon a change-in-controlchange in control allows our employees the same opportunity as other shareholders to sell shares freely following the completion of the transaction and realize the economic benefits of such transaction, without forcing them to be exposed to the post-closing performance of the acquirer. More information regarding severance benefits and the impact of a change in control can be found later in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section.

SummaryPerquisites. Generally, M&T provides limited perquisites to its NEOs. The perquisites that are provided are designed to assist NEOs in being productive and are limited to those that management and the C&HC Committee believe are consistent with M&T’s overall compensation philosophy. Given the importance of 2018 Executive Compensation Determinations

The supplemental chart below showsdeveloping business relationships for M&T’s success, the mix of annual base salary, annual cash incentiveNEOs are generally reimbursed for certain initiation fees and equity awards approved by the NCG Committeedues they incur for each NEO in January 2018:club memberships deemed advisable for business purposes, tax preparation, parking, meals and executive physical examinations.

 

40

LOGO

 

61


The NCG Committee made 2018 base salary determinations for the NEOs in January 2018.  Given M&T’s performance in 2017, compared to both that of the peer group and its business plan, the salaries of M&T’s NEOs relative to our peer group, the individual performance of each of the NEOs as discussed above, and the appointment of Mr. Jones as Chairman and CEO, the NCG Committee determined that the salaries for Messrs. Gold and Pearson and Ms. Meister should remain unchanged for 2018 and that the salaries for Messrs. Jones and King should be increased for 2018 as follows:

Named Executive Officer

2018 Base Salary

2017 Base Salary

 

Change

 

Percentage Change

 

René F. Jones

$

900,000

 

 

$

745,000

 

$

155,000

 

 

21

%

Darren J. King

$

670,000

 

 

$

650,000

 

$

20,000

 

 

3

%

Sound Compensation and Governance Practices and Policies

M&T’s executive compensation programs are managed in consideration of the Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies and other regulatory requirements. In light of these requirements, M&T has adopted certain governance practices, which are more fully described below.

Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines

for Executives and Board Members. M&T’s philosophy has been to foster a culture for its NEOs to acquire and retain M&T common stock. However,To bolster this philosophy, M&T implementedmaintains formal Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines (“Stock Ownership Guidelines”) for our Management Groupexecutive officers in order to further align thetheir interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders. The Stock Ownership Guidelines mandate that executive officers own a significant amount of M&T common stock measured as a multiple of base salary as follows (see table set forth above titled “Directors and Named Executive Officers Stock Ownership” for the actual number of shares owned by the NEOs):follows:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer – five times annualized base salary;

other NEOs – three times annualized base salary; and

other members of Management Group – two times annualized base salary.

RoleOwnership Guideline (Multiple of
Base Salary)
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer6x
Other NEOs3x
Other executive officers2x

M&T requires its executive officers to achieve the targeted stock ownership levels within five years of being promoted or namedfirst becoming subject to the applicable executive officer position, orguidelines. Once the effective date ofownership threshold is met, executives are expected to maintain the Stock Ownership Guidelines, whichever is later.required ownership amount as long as they are subject to the guidelines. Shares counted towardtowards these guidelines include any shares held by the executive directly or through a broker, shares held through an M&T Retirement Savings Plan,employee benefit plans, and shares held as restricted stock, restricted stock units or restricted stock awards, whether vested or unvested. UnexercisedUnvested PVSUs and unexercised stock options do not count.count as shares held by the executive for purposes of the guidelines. If a Management Group memberan executive officer fails to meet the requirements of this policy, the individual must hold 50% of all shares acquired from stock option exercises and restricted stock grants,the settlement of equity awards, net of shares withheld for taxes or payment of exercise price, if applicable, until they meet the holding requirement ofexecutive meets the ownership threshold. Pursuant to the Stock Ownership Guidelines.Guidelines, the C&HC Committee reviews compliance with the Stock Ownership Guidelines on an annual basis. As of the date of this proxy statement,February 14, 2024, all Management Group membersexecutive officers are in compliance with the Stock Ownership Guidelines.

Members of the Board are also required to own M&T common stock with a value equal to five times their annual cash retainer and are expected to meet this ownership guideline by the fifth anniversary of his or her initial election to the Board. Directors who receive no personal compensation for their service are not subject to this guideline. As of February 14, 2024, all directors are in compliance with the director stock ownership guidelines.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies.M&T’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits all employees from engaging in any hedging transactions or any form of short-term trading with respect to M&T securities. The Insider Trading Policy also prohibits executive officers from pledging M&T securities, except in limited circumstances. None of our NEOs pledged any M&T securities in 2023. For more information regarding the anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies, see “M&T Bank Corporation Insider Trading Policy” further above in this proxy statement.

Clawback and Forfeiture Policies. M&T has a Forfeiture Policy

M&T’s Forfeiture Policy that sets forth the circumstances under which the NCGC&HC Committee may cause a downward adjustment in current year compensation as well as cause all or part of unvested equity awards to be cancelled.canceled. Such circumstances include, but are not limited to, action or inaction on the part of an employee that results in a significant loss event (either to M&T as a whole or to a significant business line), a restatement of the financial statements due to material noncompliance with applicable financial reporting requirements, or a violation of M&T’s risk policies or procedures.

 

62

 

41LOGO


Discretionary Incentive Award Guidelines

NotwithstandingIn 2023, M&T also adopted the discretionary natureM&T Bank Corporation Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy (the “Recoupment Policy”) that provides for clawback of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation received by M&T’s current or former executive officers. Such clawback is triggered if the company is required to prepare an accounting restatement. The Recoupment Policy was adopted pursuant to NYSE listing standards that implemented the clawback provisions of the incentive awards grantedDodd-Frank Act.

In addition, our CEO and CFO are subject to the NEOs,clawback provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which generally requires that they reimburse M&T formalized guidelinesfor any bonus or other incentive- or equity-based compensation and any profits on sales of M&T common stock that are to be considered when making incentive award determinations in order to strengthenthey receive within the link between such awards and M&T’s performance, including creation12-month period following the public issuance of shareholder value,financial information if there is an accounting restatement because of material noncompliance, as well as considerationa result of risk management metrics.

Incentive Compensation Governance

M&T works continuously to ensure effective controls are in place for its incentive compensation programs. As part of M&T’s enhanced enterprise risk framework, control functions, including Human Resources, Finance, Compliance, Legal, Internal Audit, and Risk Management, are actively involved inmisconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the oversight of M&T’s incentive compensation programs. In addition, M&T’s CRO meets with the NCG Committee to discuss M&T’s risk scorecard, which details the CRO’s assessment of risk management at M&T.

Active and effective oversight of M&T’s incentive compensation practices is also provided by the NCG Committee. The NCG Committee is responsible for maintaining M&T’s Forfeiture Policy and determining the appropriate pay mix and total compensation for M&T’s NEOs.  Additionally, the NCG Committee is responsible for establishing the appropriate performance measure for PSUs.  The NCG Committee shares one member with the Risk Committee which helps to ensure the prioritization of risk management matters in incentive compensation determinations.

Enhanced Ability to Adjust Compensation in the Event of an Adverse Risk Outcomefederal securities laws.

Working together, the components of the executive compensation programs continue to drive alignment of our NEOs’ interests with those of our shareholders, are consistent with the safety and soundness of M&T and provide an enhanced ability to account for the duration of risks and adjust compensation in the event of misconduct or adverse risk outcomes.

Incentive Compensation Governance and Compensation Risk Assessment. M&T works continuously to ensure effective controls are in place for its incentive compensation programs. As part of M&T’s enhanced enterprise risk framework, control functions, including Human Resources, Finance, Compliance, Legal, Internal Audit, and Risk Management, are actively involved in the oversight of M&T’s incentive compensation programs. In addition, the CRO meets with the C&HC Committee to review and discuss M&T’s risk scorecard, which details the CRO’s assessment of risk management at M&T.

Active and effective oversight of M&T’s incentive compensation practices is also provided by the C&HC Committee. The C&HC Committee is responsible for maintaining M&T’s Forfeiture Policy and the Recoupment Policy in addition to determining the appropriate pay mix and total compensation for M&T’s NEOs. Additionally, the C&HC Committee is responsible for establishing the appropriate performance measure for performance-based stock unit awards. Reviews of M&T’s compensation plans and practices by the C&HC Committee and M&T management did not identify any plan that was reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on the bank or that would incentivize excessive risk-taking.

Tax Matters

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) and related regulations in effect for 2017 generally imposeimposes a $1 million cap on the deductibility of compensation paid to certain executive officers of a publicly held corporation subject to certain exceptions.  One exception is for “performance-based compensation” paid under shareholder approved plans.during a year. The executive officers to whom Section 162(m) applies for 2017 includes2023 include M&T’s Chief Executive OfficerCEO and CFO, the next three most highly compensated executive officers, (other than the Chief Financial Officer).and any such “covered employee” for a year after 2016. The PSUs that were awarded to Messrs. Wilmers, Gold and Pearson in January, 2015, January 2016 and January 2017, and the PSUs that were awarded to Mr. Jones in January 2017 are intended to be deductible under Section 162(m) pursuant to the performance-based compensation exception.  The cash incentive awards paid to the then-NEOs for 2015, 2016 and 2017 performance (except for the CFO) are also intended to be deductible under Section 162(m) pursuant to this exception.  While the NCGC&HC Committee considers the desirability of limitingtax consequences to M&T’s non-deductible expenses&T as one factorof many factors when it makes compensation determinations, the NCG Committee believes in preserving its ability toand will award compensation to the NEOs that it determines to be consistent with the goals of our executive compensation program even if such compensation is not deductible under Section 162(m) for competitive purposes when it is in the best interest of M&T, although the NCG Committee has taken action in recent years to maximize the deductibility of compensation awarded to the NEOs as performance-based compensation. The “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” enacted in December 2017 generally amended Section 162(m) to eliminate the performance-based compensation exception and expand the pool of includable executive officers to include the CFO for 2018.income tax purposes.

 

42

LOGO

 

63


NOMINATION, COMPENSATION AND GOVERNANCEHUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE REPORT

The Nomination, Compensation and GovernanceHuman Capital Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of SEC Regulation S-K with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Nomination, Compensation and GovernanceHuman Capital Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

This report was adopted on February 21, 2018 by the Nomination, Compensation and GovernanceHuman Capital Committee of the Board of Directors:

Brent D. Baird, Chairman

Robert T. BradyDirectors on February 16, 2024:

Gary N. Geisel, Chair

Melinda R. Rich

Herbert Washington

 

64

 

43LOGO


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table contains information concerning the compensation of M&T’s NEOs in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015.2021.

20172023 Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and

Principal Position

Yr.

Salary

($)

Bonus

($)

Stock

Awards(1)

($)

Option

Awards

($)

Non-

Equity

In-

centive

Plan

Comp.

($)

Change in

Pension

Value and

Non-

Qualified

Deferred

Comp.

Earnings(2)

($)

All Other

Comp.(3),(4)

($)

Total

($)

Robert G. Wilmers(5)

2017

$ 958,077

$    600,000

$ 1,457,115

$       -

$         -

$   953,692

$    184,088

$    4,152,972

 

Chairman &

Chief Executive Officer

2016

    950,000

       340,000

    1,675,067

          -

            -

      352,353

       183,987

       3,501,407

 

(through December 16, 2017)

2015

    950,000

       425,000

    1,675,107

          -

            -

      460,688

       184,655

       3,695,450

 

René F. Jones

2017

$ 745,000

$ 1,100,000

$ 1,044,025

$       -

$         -

$     34,241

$    115,981

$    3,039,247

 

Chairman &

Chief Executive Officer

2016

    725,000

       380,000

    1,200,081

          -

            -

        14,200

       131,589

       2,450,870

 

(effective December 20, 2017)

2015

    700,000

       475,000

    1,175,053

          -

            -

                  -

       136,898

       2,486,951

 

Darren J. King(6)

2017

$ 650,000

$    530,000

$    750,098

$       -

$         -

$     13,961

$      88,193

$    2,032,252

 

Chief Financial Officer

2016

    600,000

       400,000

       750,105

          -

            -

          5,795

         85,763

       1,841,663

 

 

2015

                -

                   -

                   -

          -

            -

                  -

                  -

                      -

 

Richard S. Gold

2017

$ 745,000

$    755,000

$ 1,044,025

$       -

$         -

$   162,746

$      99,343

$    2,806,113

 

President

2016

    725,000

       380,000

    1,200,081

          -

            -

        88,348

       104,715

       2,498,144

 

Chief Operating Officer

2015

    675,000

       475,000

    1,175,053

          -

            -

        36,809

       101,362

       2,463,224

 

Kevin J. Pearson

2017

$ 745,000

$    755,000

$ 1,109,053

$       -

$         -

$   174,938

$ 1,044,113

$    3,828,104

 

Executive Vice President

2016

    725,000

       400,000

    1,275,003

          -

            -

        92,460

       377,229

       2,869,692

 

 

2015

    675,000

       500,000

    1,175,053

          -

            -

        32,680

       114,903

       2,497,636

 

Doris P. Meister(6)

2017

$ 800,000

$    450,000

$    871,050

$       -

$         -

$               -

$      48,196

$    2,169,246

 

Executive Vice President

2016

                -

                   -

                   -

          -

            -

                  -

                  -

                      -

 

 

2015

                -

                   -

                   -

          -

            -

                  -

                  -

                      -

 

Name and
Principal Position
 Yr.  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
(1)
($)
  Option
Awards
(1)
($)
  Non-
Equity
In-
centive
Plan
Comp.
($)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-
Qualified
Deferred
Comp.
Earnings
(2)
($)
  All Other
Comp.
(3),(4)
($)
  Total
($)
 

René F. Jones

  2023   1,100,000   2,150,000   4,800,120   1,200,010   —    11,982   123,445   9,385,557 

Chairman &

  2022   1,000,000   2,400,000   4,240,259   1,060,019   —    —    115,429   8,815,707 

Chief Executive Officer

  2021   1,000,000   1,500,000   3,400,240   850,016   —    —    117,918   6,868,174 

Daryl N. Bible

  2023   418,385   750,000   2,500,137   —    —    —    23,162   3,691,684 

Senior Executive Vice President &

  2022   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —  

Chief Financial Officer

  2021   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —  

Darren J. King

  2023   700,000   1,350,000   1,600,248   400,035   —    3,952   103,392   4,157,627 

Senior Executive Vice President &

  2022   685,000   1,100,000   1,120,110   280,038   —    —    92,599   3,277,747 

Co-Head of Businesses (Former Chief Financial Officer)

  2021   685,000   815,000   1,116,192   279,007   —    —    89,524   2,984,723 

Kevin J. Pearson

  2023   775,000   1,300,000   2,000,232   500,020   —    163,129   68,719   4,807,100 

Vice Chairman &

  2022   775,000   1,500,000   1,920,092   480,006   —    —    57,979   4,733,077 

Co-Head of Businesses

  2021   765,000   1,000,000   1,849,811   462,417   —    85,753   64,624   4,227,604 

Christopher E. Kay

  2023   725,000   950,000   1,180,296   295,044   —    —    71,608   3,221,948 

Senior Executive Vice President &

  2022   725,000   1,000,000   1,040,163   260,009   —    —    61,015   3,086,187 

Head of Enterprise Platforms

  2021   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —  

Doris P. Meister

  2023   800,000   750,000   1,400,256   350,019   —    —    84,875   3,385,150 

Senior Executive Vice President &

  2022   800,000   950,000   928,202   232,042   —    —    18,586   2,928,831 

Head of Wealth Management

  2021   800,000   740,000   928,085   232,021   —    —    67,776   2,767,881 

 

(1)

The amounts indicated represent the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted to each of the NEOs. The grant date fair values are calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”).

The grant date fair value of stock awards for 2023 reflected in this column is based on the closing price of M&T common stock on January 31, 2023, or $156.00. These amounts were calculated in accordance with applicable accounting guidance (i.e., at target for PVSUs awarded in 2023). At the maximum level of performance, the value of the PVSUs awarded in 2023 would be: $3,600,168 for Mr. Jones; $1,200,264 for Mr. King; $1,500,252 for Mr. Pearson; $885,300 for Mr. Kay; and $1,050,192 for Ms. Meister. For Mr. Bible, this Stock Awards column reflects the sign-on grant of time-vested Restricted Stock Units, which were awarded at the time of his hire pursuant to our stock grant policy, the grant date fair value of which is based on the closing price of M&T common stock on July 31, 2023, or $139.86.

 

For purposes of determining the fair value of stock option awards, we use an option pricing model and the assumptions provided in the table below. M&T determines the dividend yield by dividing the current annual dividend on M&T’s common stock by the option exercise price. A historical weekly measurement of volatility is determined based on the expected life of the option granted. The risk-free interest rate is determined by reference to the yield on an outstanding U.S. Treasury Note with a term equal to the expected life of the option granted. Expected life is determined by reference to the M&T’s historical experience.

Dividend Yield

3.08

Volatility

33.83

Risk-Free Interest Rate

3.61

Expected Life (Years)

6.50

(2)

This column includes the aggregate positive change in actuarial present value of each NEO’s accumulated benefit under the M&T Bank Corporation Pension Plan (“Qualified Pension Plan”) and M&T Bank Corporation Supplemental Pension Plan (“Supplemental Pension Plan”). In accordance with SEC rules, to the extent the aggregate change in present value of all defined benefit plans for a particular fiscal year would have been a negative amount, the amount has instead been reported as $0 and the aggregate compensation for the NEO in the “Total” column has not been adjusted to reflect the negative amount. The assumptions used to calculate the present value of accumulated benefits are the same as those used for Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 715, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (“FASB ASC Topic 715”) financial statement disclosure purposes, except that no pre-retirement decrements are assumed. The present value of accrued benefits as of December 31, 20172023 is calculated assuming the executive commences his or her accrued benefit earned through December 31, 20172023 at normal retirement age. ForSee Note 13 to the December 31, 2015 calculations,Financial Statements of M&T Bank Corporation in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the mortality assumption beginning at normalSEC on February 21, 2024.

Normal retirement age is based uponage 65 for all participants. It is assumed that the Pension Plan Mortality Table (“RP-2014”) and generational projection using Mortality Improvement Scale (“MP-2014”) that were released byparticipants will elect the Society of Actuaries in 2014.  For the December 31, 2016 and 2017 calculations, the mortality assumption beginning at normal retirement age is based on RP-2014 (base year 2006) and generational projection using scale MP-2016.single life annuity form.

LOGO

65

The discount rate assumption is 4.25% for the December 31, 2015 calculations, 4.00% for the December 31, 2016 calculations and 3.50% for the December 31, 2017 calculations.

Normal retirement age is age 65 for all participants.  Mr. Wilmers was older than age 65; therefore, he was assumed to retire at his current age.  It is assumed that the participants will elect the single life annuity form.


44


Mr. Wilmers’ value reflects his death and the December 31, 2017 accrued benefit is adjusted for payment to his spouse.  The December 31, 2017 values are adjusted for the spouse’s lifetime.  Ignoring his death, the change in his December 31, 2017 accrued benefit would be $778,153.

(3)

This column includes information from the following table for each NEO in 2017:2023:

 

Name

Retirement

Savings Plan

 

Supplemental

Retirement

Savings Plan

 

Qualified

Retirement

Accumulation

Account

 

Supplemental

Retirement

Accumulation

Account

 

Term Life

Insurance

Premiums

 

Dividends(a)

 

  Retirement
Savings Plan
($)
   Leadership
Retirement
Savings Plan
($)
   Qualified
Retirement
Accumulation
Account
($)
   Leadership
Retirement
Accumulation
Account
($)
   Qualified
Discretionary
Employer
Contribution
($)
   Term Life
Insurance
Premiums
($)
 

Robert G. Wilmers

$

12,150

 

$

3,600

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

$

10,506

 

$

80,327

 

René F. Jones

$

12,150

 

$

3,600

 

$

15,525

 

$

4,600

 

$

2,622

 

$

57,061

 

   16,500       16,500       21,450       21,450       —        4,902    

Daryl N. Bible

   2,846       —        —        —        1,025       1,782    

Darren J. King

$

12,150

 

$

3,600

 

$

11,475

 

$

3,400

 

$

810

 

$

34,145

 

   16,500       16,500       16,500       16,500       —        1,242    

Richard Gold

$

12,150

 

$

3,600

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

$

1,615

 

$

55,096

 

Kevin J. Pearson

$

12,150

 

$

3,600

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

$

4,902

 

$

59,380

 

   16,500       16,500       —        —        —        7,524    

Christopher E. Kay

   16,500       16,500       7,425       7,425       —        1,615    

Doris P. Meister

$

12,150

 

 

-

 

$

6,075

 

 

-

 

$

3,564

 

$

12,056

 

   16,500       16,500       9,075       9,075       —        14,478    

 

(a)

This column includes dividends and dividend equivalents on unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units awarded in 2017, 2016 and 2015.

(4)

Perquisites provided to the NEOs in 20172023 included the following:following (as indicted by “X”):

 

Name

Club

Membership

Dues &

Expenses

Tax

Preparation

Parking

Meals

Executive

Physical

Exam &

Associated

Travel

Expenses

Robert G. WilmersName

Club
Membership
Dues &
Expenses
Tax
Preparation
ParkingMeals

XExecutive

Physical

X

X

Relocation

X

René F. Jones

X    X    X    X    X    

XDaryl N. Bible

X

X

X

X    X    

Darren J. King

X

X

X

X

X

Richard Gold

X

X

X

X

X

X    

Kevin J. Pearson

X    X    X    

Christopher E. Kay

X

X

X

X

X    X    

Doris P. Meister

XX    X    

X

X

No perquisites provided in 2023 exceeded the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total perquisites provided to each NEO.

In addition to these perquisites, expenses associated with Mr. Wilmers’ apartment in Buffalo, New York totaled $36,451 in 2017 and Mr. Pearson had relocation expenses and tax gross up expenses totaling $945,240 in 2017 in connection with the sale of his residence in New York City, which resulted from his company-requested move to Baltimore, Maryland.  No other perquisites exceeded the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total perquisites provided to each NEO.

(5)

Mr. Wilmers passed away on December 16, 2017.

(6)

Mr. King and Ms. Meister were not NEOs in the years for which no compensation information is provided.

CEO Pay Ratio

In accordance with the final rule issued under section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act, companies, including M&T, are now required to disclose the ratio of the total annual compensation of their CEO to that of their median employee. The new SEC rules require disclosure of (i) the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of M&T, except the CEO; (ii) the annual total compensation of the CEO; and (iii) the ratio of the amount of annual total compensation of the CEO to the amount of the median annual total compensation of all employees of M&T. Because the SEC rules do not mandate a particular approach to determining the median employee, M&T has employed the following approach:

Given Mr. Wilmers and Mr. Jones both served as CEO during 2017, M&T has electedAs allowed under section 953(b), we have chosen to identifycontinue using the same median employee for purposes of this disclosure as was used in the proxy statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of December 15, 2017 when Mr. Wilmers was serving as CEO, as permitted by Instruction 10 to Item 402(u). The ratio disclosed below was calculated using Mr. Wilmers’ total annualized compensation for 2017.  

Shareholders. There has been no material change in our employee population that we believe would significantly impact this disclosure. Our median employee was identified by calculating the total cash compensation and equity awards granted within a rollingthe twelve months prior to December 31, 2023 to all domestic employees, excluding the CEO, employed as of December 15, 2017.31, 2023, the last day of our fiscal year. The fixed compensation of our employees hired during the year was annualized.

45


Additionally, non-U.S. employees account for 0.45%0.60% of M&T’s employees and therefore have been excluded under the de minimis exemption allowed by the rule. These non-U.S. employees being excluded are from Canada (9 employees), France (1 employee), the United Kingdom (77 employees), Germany (9 employees) and Ireland (37 employees).

 

Total non-U.S. employees:

133

Total U.S. employees (not including CEO):

22,089

As calculated using the methodology required for the 2023 Summary Compensation Table, the annual total annualized compensation of Mr. WilmersJones was $4,167,972$9,385,557 and the annual total annual compensation of the median employee for the corresponding period was $57,571$84,682, which yields a ratio of 72111 to 1.

66

LOGO


Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table reflects the terms of compensation plan-based awards granted to the NEOs in 2017.2023.

20172023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

Name

Grant

Date

Estimated Future

Payouts Under Non-

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards ($)

 

Estimated Future

Payouts Under

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards (#)

All

Other

Stock

Awards:

Number

of

Shares

of Stock

or Units(1)

 

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number

of

Securities

Under-

lying

Options

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards

 

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Stock and

Option

Awards(2)

 

 

 Grant
Date
  C&HC
Committee
Approval
Date
  Estimated Future
Payouts Under Non-
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
($)
  Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
(1)(2)
(#)
  All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Under-
lying
Options
(3)
(#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($)
  Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
(5)
($)
 

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Max.

 

Threshold

Target

Max.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         Threshold  Target  Max.  Threshold  Target  Max.                 

Robert G. Wilmers

1/31/17

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

-

 

8,963

 

-

$

-

 

$

1,457,115

 

(3)

René F. Jones

1/31/17

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

-

 

6,422

 

-

$

-

 

$

1,044,025

 

(3)

  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    15,385   23,078   —    —    —    2,400,060 
  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    15,385   —    —    —    —    2,400,060 
  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    25,168   156.00   1,200,010 

Daryl N. Bible(4)

  7/31/2023   5/19/2023   —    —    —    —    —    —    17,876   —    —    2,500,137 

Darren J. King

1/31/17

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

-

 

4,614

 

-

$

-

 

$

750,098

 

(4)

  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    5,129   7,694   —    —    —    800,124 

Richard S. Gold

1/31/17

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

-

 

6,422

 

-

$

-

 

$

1,044,025

 

(3)

Darren J. King

 1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    5,129   —    —    —    —    800,124 
 1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    8,390   156.00   400,035 

1/31/17

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

-

 

6,822

 

-

$

-

 

$

1,109,053

 

(3)

  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    6,411   9,617   —    —    —    1,000,116 

Kevin J. Pearson

 1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    6,411   —    —    —    —    1,000,116 
 1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    10,487   156.00   500,020 
  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    3,783   5,675   —    —    —    590,148 

Christopher E. Kay

 1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    3,783   —    —    —    —    590,148 
 1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    6,188   156.00   295,044 

1/31/17

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

-

 

5,358

 

-

$

-

 

$

871,050

 

(4)

  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    4,488   6,732   —    —    —    700,128 

Doris P. Meister

 1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    4,488   —    —    —    —    700,128 
 1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    7,341   156.00   350,019 

 

((1)1)

Vesting of the stockPVSU awards granted to the NEOs in 20172023, which appears in the first row for each NEO (except for Mr. Bible), is scheduled to occur on a three-year cliff basis. The PVSUs are earned only to the extent M&T performance is achieved against a pre-established absolute and relative net operating ROTCE metric (“PVSU Performance Metric”) for the three-year performance period of 2023–2025, with performance certified by the C&HC Committee in the first quarter of 2026. Depending on the level of the PVSU Performance Metric achieved, the number of shares vesting will be a range between 0% to 150% of the initial award value and will include any accumulated reinvested dividend equivalent units. The awards issued allow for accelerated vesting at target in cases of death and disability, on a pro-rata basis for an involuntary termination without cause, or based on the greater of target or actual performance achieved in the case of a change in control.

(2)

Vesting of the PHSU awards granted to the NEOs in 2023, which appears in the second row for each NEO (except for Mr. Bible), is scheduled to occur on a graduated basis with 33% vesting on January 31, 2018,2024, an additional 33% vesting on January 31, 20192025 and the remaining 34% vesting on January 31, 2020.2026. Each vesting is contingent upon M&T achieving a pre-established net operating ROTCE metric (“PHSU Performance Requirement”Hurdle”). IfAwards are only payable at the target level; if the PHSU Performance RequirementHurdle is not satisfied for a given period,year, the portion of the stock award that is scheduled to vest on the vesting date immediately following that performance period will not vest and will be forfeited unless otherwise determined by the NCGC&HC Committee. The Equity Incentive Compensation Plan allowsawards allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, position elimination, retirement, or a change in control.

(3)

Vesting of the stock option awards granted to the NEOs in 2023 is scheduled to occur on a graduated basis with 33% vesting on January 31, 2024, an additional 33% vesting on January 31, 2025 and the remaining 34% vesting on January 31, 2026. The awards expire 10 years from the grant date. The awards allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, or a change in control with an exercise period of one year from the date of termination (but not beyond 10 years from the date of grant). Upon retirement, the awards continue to vest according to the schedule noted above with an exercise period equal to the lesser of four years following the date of retirement or 10 years from the date of grant.

(4)

The grant for Mr. Bible was delivered in Restricted Stock Units upon his employment and in accordance with the stock granting policy. The vesting is scheduled to occur on a graduated basis with 33% vesting on July 31, 2024, an additional 33% vesting on July 31, 2025 and the remaining 34% vesting on July 31, 2026. The Restricted Stock Units allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, retirement, position elimination, or a change-in-control.  change in control.

(5)

(2)

The amounts indicated represent the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted to each of the NEOs in 2017.2023. The grant date fair values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

 

(3)LOGO

In the case of the stock awards granted to Messrs. Wilmers, Jones, Gold and Pearson in 2017, termination of employment as a result of death, disability or change-in-control results in immediate vesting of any unvested portion of the award.  As such, the portion of Mr. Wilmers’ award described above that remained unvested on the date of his death accelerated and vested as of December 18, 2017.

67

 

Termination of employment as a result of retirement also results in accelerated vesting of any unvested portion of the award on the next scheduled vesting date, but only if the Performance Requirement is met for the performance period in which retirement occurs.  If the Performance Requirement is not met for the performance period in which retirement occurs, the portion of the stock award that is scheduled to vest on the vesting date immediately following that performance period will not vest and will be forfeited unless otherwise determined by the NCG Committee.  The portion of the stock award that is scheduled to vest in any performance period following retirement will vest if the Performance Requirement is met for that performance period, or, if the Performance Requirement is not met for that performance period, will not vest and will be forfeited unless otherwise determined by the NCG Committee.

(4)

In the case of the stock awards granted to Mr. King and Ms. Meister in 2017, termination of employment as a result of death, disability, retirement or change-in-control results in immediate vesting of any unvested portion of the award.

46


Outstanding Equity AwardsAwards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table reflects the number and terms of stock option awards and stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 20172023 for the NEOs.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172023 Fiscal Year-End

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

 

Option Awards

 

     

Stock Awards

 

 

Name

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Un-exercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Un-

exercised

Options Un-

exercisable

(#)

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Un-

exercised

Unearned

Options

(#)

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

 

Option

Expira-

tion

Date

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That Have

Not Vested

(#)(1)

 

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That Have

Not Vested

($)

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That Have

Not Vested

($)

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That Have

Not Vested

($)

 

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options Un-
exercisable
(1)
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
(1)(2)
(#)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(1)(3)(4)
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)
 

Robert G. Wilmers

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

René F. Jones

 

-  

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

17,146

 

$

2,931,795

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

  16,770   —    —    190.78   1/31/28   —    —    —    —  

René F. Jones

 22,215   —    —    164.54   1/31/29   —    —    —    —  
 30,541   —    —    173.04   2/5/30   —    —    —    —  
 18,488   9,245   —    132.47   1/29/31   —    —    —    —  
 7,656   15,313   —    169.38   1/31/32   —    —    —    —  
 —    25,168   —    156.00   1/31/33   25,922   3,553,388   49,225   6,747,778 
  —    —    —    —    —    17,876   2,450,442   —    —  

Darren J. King

 

17,082

 

 

 

 

38.91

 

1/30/19

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

  6,038   —    —    190.78   1/31/28   —    —    —    —  

-

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

11,216

 

$

1,917,824

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 7,742   —    —    164.54   1/31/29   —    —    —    —  

Richard S. Gold

 

-

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

17,146

 

$

2,931,795

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

Darren J. King

 11,356   —    —    173.04   2/5/30   —    —    —    —  
 6,068   3,035   —    132.47   1/29/31   —    —    —    —  
 2,022   4,046   —    169.38   1/31/32   —    —    —    —  
 —    8,390   —    156.00   1/31/33   8,188   1,122,411   14,667   2,010,595 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

17,999

 

$

3,077,649

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

  10,062   —    —    190.78   1/31/28   —    —    —    —  
 13,296   —    —    164.54   1/31/29   —    —    —    —  

Kevin J. Pearson

 18,540   —    —    173.04   2/5/30   —    —    —    —  
 10,058   5,029   —    132.47   1/29/31   —    —    —    —  
 3,467   6,934   —    169.38   1/31/32   —    —    —    —  
  —    10,487   —    156.00   1/31/33   11,574   1,586,564   21,422   2,936,545 
  1,878   3,756   —    169.38   1/31/32   —    —    —    —  

Christopher E. Kay

 —    6,188   —    156.00   1/31/33   7,207   987,936   12,089   1,657,179 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

5,358

 

$

916,164

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

  6,708   —    —    190.78   1/31/28   —    —    —    —  

Doris P. Meister

 7,984   —    —    173.04   2/5/30   —    —    —    —  
 2,523   2,524   —    132.47   1/29/31   —    —    —    —  
 1,676   3,352   —    169.38   1/31/32   —    —    —    —  
 —    7,341   —    156.00   1/31/33   7,027   963,261   12,526   1,717,072 

 

(1)

Vesting details provided below in separate chart for outstanding Stock Options, PHSUs and PVSUs.

 

(2)

(1)

Vesting of the stockPHSU awards granted to the NEOs in 20152021, 2022 and 20162023 occurs on a graduated basis with 33% of the award vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date, an additional 33% of the award vesting on the second anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining 34% of the award vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date. Each vesting is contingent upon M&T achieving the pre-established PHSU Performance Hurdle. If the PHSU Performance Hurdle is not satisfied for a given period, the portion of the stock award that is scheduled to vest on the vesting date immediately following that performance period will not vest and will be forfeited unless otherwise determined by the C&HC Committee. Note that with respect to the 2019 awards, the award agreements issued under the 2009 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, retirement or a change in control, while the 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 awards, which were issued under the 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, allow accelerated vesting in the aforementioned cases plus in situations of a position elimination. See footnotes (1), (2) and (3) to the table set forth above titled “2017“2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” for the vesting schedule of the stock awards granted to the NEOs in 2017.2023. See the below chart for more detailed information concerning the number of outstanding shares from each PHSU grant that remain unvested restricted stock award and their corresponding vesting dates.  Note

68

LOGO


(3)

Vesting of the PVSU award granted to the NEOs in 2023 occurs on a 3-year cliff basis and has a payout range of 0% to 150% based on pre-established absolute and relative ROTCE performance over the 3-year performance period. Shares in this column include the accrued dividend equivalent units, which accrue quarterly at the time the quarterly dividend is paid and reflect maximum payout at 150%. See the below chart for more detailed information concerning the number of outstanding shares from each PVSU grant that remain unvested and their corresponding vesting dates.

(4)

The PVSUs granted on January 29, 2021, with a performance period of January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023, vested on December 31, 2023, and were earned based on the Equity Incentive Compensation Plan allowslevel of achievement against the pre-established performance metrics as determined by the C&HC Committee on February 16, 2024. These PVSUs are reflected in the 2023 Options Exercised and Stock Vested table.

(5)

The grant for Mr. Bible was delivered in Restricted Stock Units upon his employment and in accordance with our stock grant policy. The vesting is scheduled to occur on a graduated basis with 33% vesting on July 31, 2024, an additional 33% vesting on July 31, 2025 and the remaining 34% vesting on July 31, 2026. The Restricted Stock Units allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, retirement, position elimination, or a change-in-control.  As such, the portion of change in control.

Name(1)

  Grant Date  Total Unvested Options
Outstanding
   Options Not Vested   Remaining
Vesting
Dates
 

René F. Jones

  1/29/21   9,245    9,245    1/29/24 
  1/31/22   15,313    7,656    1/31/24 
   7,657    1/31/25 
  1/31/23   25,168    8,389    1/31/24 
   8,389    1/31/25 
   8,390    1/31/26 

Darren J. King

  1/29/21   3,035    3,035    1/29/24 
  1/31/22   4,046    2,023    1/31/24 
   2,023    1/31/25 
  1/31/23   8,390    2,796    1/31/24 
   2,797    1/31/25 
   2,797    1/31/26 

Kevin J. Pearson

  1/29/21   5,029    5,029    1/29/24 
  1/31/22   6,934    3,467    1/31/24 
   3,467    1/31/25 
  1/31/23   10,487    3,495    1/31/24 
   3,496    1/31/25 
   3,496    1/31/26 

Christopher E. Kay

  1/31/22   3,756    1,878    1/31/24 
   1,878    1/31/25 
  1/31/23   6,188    2,062    1/31/24 
   2,063    1/31/25 
   2,063    1/31/26 

Doris P. Meister

  1/29/21   2,524    2,524    1/29/24 
  1/31/22   3,352    1,676    1/31/24 
   1,676    1/31/25 
  1/31/23   7,341    2,447    1/31/24 
   2,447    1/31/25 
   2,447    1/31/26 

(1)

Mr. Wilmers’ awards that remained unvested on the date of his death as described below accelerated and vestedBible did not have any outstanding Stock Options as of December 18, 2017.31, 2023.

LOGO

69


Name(1)

  Grant Date   Performance Based
Stock Units Granted
   Performance Based
Stock Units Not
Vested
   Remaining
Vesting Dates
 

René F. Jones

   1/29/21    12,834    4,278    1/29/24 
   1/31/22    9,388    3,129    1/31/24 
   3,130    1/31/25 
   1/31/22    15,646    16,789(2)    12/31/24 
   1/31/23    15,385    5,128    1/31/24 
   5,128    1/31/25 
   5,129    1/31/26 
   1/31/23    15,385    16,028(2)    12/31/25 

Darren J. King

   1/29/21    4,213    1,405    1/29/24 
   1/31/22    2,480    827    1/31/24 
   827    1/31/25 
   1/31/22    4,133    4,435(2)    12/31/24 
   1/31/23    5,129    1,709    1/31/24 
   1,710    1/31/25 
   1,710    1/31/26 
   1/31/23    5,129    5,343(2)    12/31/25 

Kevin J. Pearson

   1/29/21    6,982    2,328    1/29/24 
   1/31/22    4,251    1,417    1/31/24 
   1,418    1/31/25 
   1/31/22    7,085    7,603(2)    12/31/24 
   1/31/23    6,411    2,136    1/31/24 
   2,137    1/31/25 
   2,138    1/31/26 
   1/31/23    6,411    6,679(2)    12/31/25 

Christopher E. Kay

   1/29/21    5,662    1,888    1/29/24 
   1/31/22    2,303    768    1/31/24 
   768    1/31/25 
   1/31/22    3,838    4,118(2)    12/31/24 
   1/31/23    3,783    1,260    1/31/24 
   1,261    1/31/25 
   1,262    1/31/26 
   1/31/23    3,783    3,941(2)    12/31/25 

Doris P. Meister

   1/29/21    3,503    1,168    1/29/24 
   1/31/22    2,055    685    1/31/24 
   686    1/31/25 
   1/31/22    3,425    3,675(2)    12/31/24 
   1/31/23    4,488    1,495    1/31/24 
   1,496    1/31/25 
   1,497    1/31/26 
   1/31/23    4,488    4,676(2)    12/31/25 

 

(1)

Mr. Bible did not have any outstanding PHSUs or PVSUs as of December 31, 2023.

 

(2)

Awards indicated are PVSUs with a three-year cliff vesting schedule with payouts ranging from 0% to 150% of target based on absolute and relative ROTCE performance. Also included in these figures are the accrued reinvested dividend equivalent units which are accrued on a quarterly basis and will pay out at the time the underlying shares vest and are subject to the same performance payout percentage. The PVSUs vest on December 31 of the last year of the three-year performance period, as indicated in the chart, but are not actually earned and settled until after the level of achievement against the pre-established performance metrics is determined by the C&HC Committee, which is completed in the first quarter of the year following the three-year performance period.

 

70

 

47LOGO


Name

Grant Date

Shares or

Units Granted

 

Shares or

Units Not

Vested

 

Remaining

Vesting Dates

Robert G. Wilmers

-

-

 

-

 

-

 

1/30/15

 

10,384

 

 

3,462

 

1/31/18

 

1/29/16

 

10,892

 

 

3,631

 

1/29/18

René F. Jones

 

 

 

 

 

3,631

 

1/29/19

 

1/31/17

 

6,422

 

 

2,140

 

1/31/18

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,141

 

1/31/19

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,141

 

1/31/20

 

1/30/15

 

6,186

 

 

2,063

 

1/30/18

 

1/29/16

 

6,808

 

 

2,269

 

1/29/18

Darren J. King

 

 

 

 

 

2,270

 

1/29/19

 

1/31/17

 

4,614

 

 

1,537

 

1/31/18

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,538

 

1/31/19

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,539

 

1/31/20

 

1/30/15

 

10,384

 

 

3,462

 

1/31/18

 

1/29/16

 

10,892

 

 

3,631

 

1/29/18

Richard S. Gold

 

 

 

 

 

3,631

 

1/29/19

 

1/31/17

 

6,422

 

 

2,140

 

1/31/18

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,141

 

1/31/19

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,141

 

1/31/20

 

1/30/15

 

10,384

 

 

3,462

 

1/31/18

 

1/29/16

 

11,572

 

 

3,857

 

1/29/18

Kevin J. Pearson

 

 

 

 

 

3,858

 

1/29/19

 

1/31/17

 

6,822

 

 

2,273

 

1/31/18

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,274

 

1/31/19

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,275

 

1/31/20

 

1/31/17

 

5,358

 

 

1,785

 

1/31/18

Doris P. Meister

 

 

 

 

 

1,786

 

1/31/19

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,787

 

1/31/20

48


Options Exercised and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth the number of stock option awards exercised and the value realized upon exercise during 20172023 for the NEOs, as well as the number of stock awards vested and the value realized upon vesting.

20172023 Options Exercised and Stock Vested

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

  Option Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

Number of

Shares Acquired

on Exercise

 

Value Realized

on Exercise(1)

 

Number of

Shares Acquired

on Vesting

 

Value Realized

on Vesting

 

  

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise

(#)

  Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
   

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(1)

(#)

   Value Realized
on Vesting
(2)
($)
 

Robert G. Wilmers

 

-

 

$

-

 

 

46,464

 

$

7,835,800

 

René F. Jones

 

-

 

$

-

 

 

15,680

 

$

2,556,787

 

  —    —     32,111    4,740,425.56 

Darren J. King

 

12,539

 

$

746,895

 

 

6,125

 

$

1,000,479

 

  —    —     10,488    1,549,403.42 

Richard S. Gold

 

-

 

$

-

 

 

12,872

 

$

2,100,291

 

Kevin J. Pearson

 

-

 

$

-

 

 

15,797

 

$

2,576,142

 

  —    —     17,398    2,570,030.61 

Christopher E. Kay

  —    —     4,100    683,083.08 

Doris P. Meister

 

-

 

$

-

 

 

-

 

$

-

 

  —    —     8,779    1,298,409.99 

 

(1)

Includes PVSUs granted on January 29, 2021 with a performance period of January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023. The PVSUs and dividend equivalent units vested on December 31, 2023 and were earned after the level of achievement 150% against the pre-established performance metrics was determined by the C&HC Committee on February 16, 2024.

 

(2)

(1)

Based upon the difference between the exercise price andAmounts were calculated using the closing price of M&T’s common stock on the NYSE on the date(s) of exercise.vesting dates. This also includes accrued cash dividends that payout only to the extent the underlying shares vest and distribute to participants.

Pension Benefits

The following table sets forth the present value of the accumulated pension benefits for the NEOs.

20172023 Pension Benefits(1)(5)

 

Name

Plan Name

Number of

Years Credited

Service(3)

Present Value

of Accumulated

Benefit

 

Payments

during Last

Fiscal Year

 

Robert G. Wilmers

Qualified Pension Plan(2)

34

$

4,635,172

 

$

-

 

Supplemental Pension Plan(2)(4)

34

 

869,967

 

 

-

 

René F. Jones

Qualified Pension Plan(2)

13

$

251,273

 

$

-

 

Darren J. King

Qualified Pension Plan(2)

5

$

75,148

 

$

-

 

Richard S. Gold

Qualified Pension Plan(2)

28

$

822,230

 

$

-

 

Supplemental Pension Plan(2)(4)

28

 

184,718

 

 

-

 

Kevin J. Pearson

Qualified Pension Plan(2)

28

$

886,000

 

$

-

 

Supplemental Pension Plan(2)(4)

28

 

195,937

 

 

-

 

Doris P. Meister

Qualified RAA(5)

-

$

-

 

$

-

 

Supplemental RAA(5)

-

-

 

 

-

 

Name

  Plan Name  Number of
Years Credited
Service
(3)
   

Present Value
of
Accumulated
Benefit

($)

   Payments
during Last
Fiscal Year
($)
 

René F. Jones

  Qualified Pension Plan(2)   13    251,620    —  

Darren J. King

  Qualified Pension Plan(2)   5    82,980    —  

Kevin J. Pearson

  Qualified Pension Plan(2)   34    1,185,299    —  
   Supplemental Pension Plan(2)(4)   34    403,828    —  

 

(1)

Please refer to footnote (2) set forth into the “2017“2023 Summary Compensation Table” for the assumptions used to calculate the present value of accumulated benefits.

(2)

The Qualified Pension Plan provides tax-qualified pension benefits for a broad base of M&T employees. Effective January 1, 2006, the formula used to calculate benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan was modified with respect to benefits earned after 2005. Benefits accrued under the prior formula as of December 31, 2005 were frozen and all Qualified Pension Plan participants, including each NEO (other than Ms. Meister and Messrs. Kay and Bible, who were never eligible to participate in the Qualified Pension Plan), were given a one-time election to remain an active participant in the Qualified Pension Plan and earn future benefits under a new reduced pension benefit formula, or to retain the frozen benefit in the Qualified Pension Plan and earn future enhanced benefits underpursuant to a new defined contribution program,component under the M&T Bank Corporation Retirement Savings Plan known as the “Qualified RAA.” Under the Qualified RAA, in which qualifying participants are credited a percentage of total pay based on length of service.  Under the current formula,Pension Plan, each participant’s retirement benefit equals the sum of (a) the participant’s accrued benefit as of December 31, 2005 and (b) for each year of credited service earned after December 31, 2005, the sum of (i) 1% of compensation up to the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit for the plan year plus (ii) 0.35% of eligible compensation for the plan year in excess of 50% of that year’s Social Security wage base. Messrs. Wilmers,Mr. Pearson and Gold elected to remain in the Qualified Pension Plan for periods on and after January 1, 2006. Messrs. Jones and King elected to discontinue their future participation in the Qualified Pension Plan and Supplemental Pension Plan, choosing instead to participate in the Qualified RAA effective January 1, 2006. Messrs. Jones and King have an accrued benefit under the Qualified Pension Plan as of December 31, 2005 but have ceased to earn any benefit accrual service and any further benefit under the Qualified Pension Plan as of January 1, 2006.

 

(3)

49


(3)

The years of credited service for all of the NEOs are based only on their service while eligible for participation in the Qualified Pension Plan or the prior pension plan of an acquired bank.Plan. Generally, a participant must be paid for at least 1,000 hours of work during a plan year to be credited with a year of service for purposes of the Qualified Pension Plan.

LOGO

71


(4)

As described in footnote (2) above, effective January 1, 2006, the formula used to calculate benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan was modified with respect to benefits earned after 2005, and participants were given the opportunity to elect whether to continue participation in the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan. Of the NEOs, Messrs. Wilmers,Mr. Pearson and Gold elected to continue to actively participate in the revised Qualified Pension Plan and, as such, they continueMr. Pearson continues to be participantsparticipate in the Supplemental Pension Plan. Messrs. Jones and King elected to discontinue histheir future active participation in the Qualified Pension Plan and Supplemental Pension Plan, choosing instead to participate in the Qualified RAA effective January 1, 2006. M&T maintains a defined contribution Supplemental RAAnonqualified deferred compensation plan that is designed to provide participants with contributions that cannot be provided under the Qualified RAA because of applicable federal income tax limits.  As under the Supplemental Pension Plan, creditableInternal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation underlimit. For purposes of those contributions, compensation is capped at two times the Supplemental RAA is also limited to $350,000.annual Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit. For 2023, the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit was $330,000 resulting in a plan compensation maximum of $660,000. Messrs. Jones and King participated in the Supplemental RAAnonqualified deferred compensation plan in 20172023 and were credited with a contribution for 20172023 as reported below under the discussion of 20172023 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans.

(5)

(5)

Ms. Meister wasand Messrs. Kay and Bible are not eligible to receive a benefitparticipants in the Qualified RAA andPension Plan or Supplemental RAA in 2017.Pension Plan.

Explanation of 2023 Pension Benefits Table

Table. The 2023 Pension Benefits Table indicates, for each of the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan, the NEO’s number of years of credited service, present value of accumulated benefit and any payments made during the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. See footnote (2) to the table set forth above titled “2017“2023 Summary Compensation Table.”

The amounts indicated in the column titled “Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” represent the lump-sum value, as of December 31, 20172023, of the annual benefit that was earned by the NEOs as of December 31, 2017,2023, assuming payment begins at each executive’s normal retirement age, or their current age, if later. The normal retirement age is defined as age 65 in the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan. Certain assumptions were used to determine the present value of accumulated benefits payable at normal retirement age. Those assumptions are described in footnote (2) set forth into the “2017“2023 Summary Compensation Table.” Certain material terms of each of the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan are summarized in the footnotes set forth into the “2017“2023 Pension Benefits Table” and in the narrative below.

Qualified Pension Plan

. Benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan are paid over the lifetime of the NEO or the lifetimes of the NEO and a beneficiary, as elected by the NEO. If the NEO is married on the date payments are to begin under the Qualified Pension Plan, payment will be in the form of a joint and 50% survivor annuity with the spouse as beneficiary unless the NEO elects another form of payment with the consent of the spouse. None of the NEOs who are participants in the Qualified Pension Plan are eligible to elect to receive the benefit due under the Qualified Pension Plan in the form of a one-time lump sum payment. If benefits are paid in a form in which a benefit is to be paid to a beneficiary after the death of the NEO, benefits are reduced from the amount payable as a lifetime benefit solely to the NEO in accordance with the actuarial factors that apply to all participants in the Qualified Pension Plan. A participant’s benefit under the Qualified Pension Plan is generally payable as an annuity with monthly benefit payments unless the present value of the normal retirement benefit is less than $5,000.  Benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan are funded by an irrevocable, tax-exempt trust.payments. The Qualified Pension Plan benefits of all participants, including those benefits of NEOs, are payable from the assets held by the an irrevocable, tax-exempt trust.

Creditable compensation under the Qualified Pension Plan generally includes the compensation reported on Form W-2 in the box for wages, tips and other compensation plus pre-tax salary reduction contributions under the Retirement Savings Plan and the M&T Bank Corporation Flexible Benefits Plan.  

50


In calculating a participant’s benefit, annual compensation in excess of athe annual Internal Revenue Code 401(a)(17) limit set annually by the Secretary of the Treasury may not be considered.

A participant is eligible for early retirement under the Qualified Pension Plan if the participant retires before normal retirement age but after attaining age 55 and completing 10 years of service. An early retirement benefit is reduced 4% per year for each year that the benefit commences prior to normal retirement age. At December 31, 2017, Messrs.2023, Mr. King and Jones werewas not eligible for early retirement and Messrs. Jones and Pearson were eligible for early retirement.

Benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan are 100% vested after an employee has completed at least five years of service, and each NEO is 100% vested in his benefits in the Qualified Pension Plan.

Supplemental Pension PlanPlan.

The Supplemental Pension Plan provides a benefit that is equalintended to the difference between the pension benefitmake up for benefits that wouldcannot be provided under the Qualified Pension Plan if that plan were not subjectdue to certain limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and the benefit actually provided under the Qualified Pension Plan.  CreditableSection 401(a)(17) compensation that may be considered underlimit. Under the Supplemental Pension Plan, formula is limitedcompensation up to $350,000.two times the annual Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit may be considered. For 2023, the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit was $330,000 resulting in a compensation maximum of $660,000.

72

LOGO


Generally, benefits under the Supplemental Pension Plan are paid over the lifetime of the NEO or the lifetimes of the NEO and a beneficiary, as elected by the NEO. The Supplemental Pension Plan allows a NEO to elect to receive the benefit due under the plan in the form of a one-time lump sum payment. If benefits are paid as a lump sum payment, benefits are adjusted from the amount payable as a lifetime benefit solely to the NEO in accordance with the actuarial factors that apply to all participants in the Qualified Pension Plan.

The pension benefit under the Supplemental Pension Plan is reduced in the same manner as under the Qualified Pension Plan if it begins to be paid before normal retirement age and continues to accrue in the same manner as under the Qualified Pension Plan if it begins to be paid after the normal retirement age.

Service is determined under the Supplemental Pension Plan in the same manner as under the Qualified Pension Plan, as described above. The vesting schedule in the Supplemental Pension Plan is the same as in the Qualified Pension Plan and all of the NEOs who are participants in the Supplemental Pension Plan are 100% vested in their benefits in the Supplemental Pension Plan.

A participant is eligible for early retirement under the Supplemental Pension Plan if the participant retires before normal retirement age but after attaining age 55 and completing 10 years of service. An early retirement benefit is reduced 4% per year for each year that the benefit commences prior to normal retirement age. At December 31, 2023, Messrs. Jones and Pearson were eligible for early retirement, while Mr. King was not eligible for early retirement.

LOGO

 

73

51


Nonqualified DeferredDeferred Compensation

The following table sets forth contributions, earnings and year-end balances for 20172023 with respect to nonqualified deferred compensation plans for the NEOs.

20172023 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

Name

Plan Name

Executive

Contributions

in Last FY(1)

 

Registrant

Contributions

in Last FY(2)

 

Aggregate

Earnings

in Last FY(3)

 

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

 

Aggregate

Balance at

Last FYE(4)

 

 Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation
Component
 

Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
(1)

($)

  

Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
(2)

($)

  

Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
(3)

($)

  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
  

Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
(4)

($)

 

Supplemental 401(k)

$

10,500

 

$

3,825

 

$

104,866

 

$

-

 

$

1,077,377

 

Robert G. Wilmers

Supplemental RAA

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Deferred Bonus Plan

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Supplemental 401(k)

$

59,500

 

$

3,825

 

$

52,042

 

$

-

 

$

645,930

 

René F. Jones

Supplemental RAA

 

-

 

 

4,250

 

 

5,936

 

 

-

 

 

71,894

 

 Leadership
Deferral/Match
 174,423   15,250  97,766   —   779,468 

Deferred Bonus Plan

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Supplemental 401(k)

$

3,500

 

$

3,825

 

$

41,455

 

$

-

 

$

339,347

 

René F. Jones

Leadership RAA  —    19,825  8,897   —   72,477 

Supplemental RAA

 

-

 

 

3,613

 

 

10,791

 

 

-

 

 

71,246

 

 Leadership
Deferral/Match
 234,827   15,250  289,993   —   1,450,315 

Deferred Bonus Plan

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Supplemental 401(k)

$

21,000

 

$

3,825

 

$

44,503

 

$

-

 

$

276,353

 

Richard S. Gold

Supplemental RAA

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Deferred Bonus Plan

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

4,834

 

 

(21,510

)

 

25,982

 

Supplemental 401(k)

$

70,000

 

$

3,825

 

$

49,148

 

$

-

 

$

500,207

 

Darren J. King

Leadership RAA  —    15,250  33,580   —   187,444 

Supplemental RAA

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 Leadership
Deferral/Match
 188,750   15,250  340,825   —   1,636,628 

Deferred Bonus Plan

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Doris P. Meister(5)

Supplemental 401(k)

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

Supplemental RAA

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Kevin J. Pearson

Leadership RAA  —    —    —    —    —  
 Leadership
Deferral/Match
 86,250   15,250  99,543   —   351,334 

Christopher E. Kay

Leadership RAA  —    6,863  6,394     22,229 
 Leadership
Deferral/Match
 151,000   —   19,508   —   323,393 

Doris P. Meister

Leadership RAA  —    8,388  577   —   22,990 

 

(1)

The Supplemental 401(k) Planexecutive contributions to the Leadership Deferral/Match component were based on the NEOs’ deferral elections and the salaries set forth in the “2017“2023 Summary Compensation Table.” The salaries in the “2017“2023 Summary Compensation Table” include these contributions. Beginning in 2020, the NEOs had the opportunity to also make deferrals from their cash STI compensation.

(2)

This column represents M&T matching contributions attributable to contributions made to the Supplemental 401(k) Plan during 2017 by the NEOs and contributions by M&T to the Supplemental RAA attributable to 20162022 based on compensation earned and service performed during the year. The contributionThese contributions by M&T to the Supplemental 401(k) PlanLeadership Deferral/Match and the SupplementalLeadership RAA components attributable to 2017 was2022 were made after December 31, 2017 and is not reflected in the aggregate year-end balance for each NEO.  These values are also reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column set forth in the “2017 Summary Compensation Table.”2022.

(3)

This column reflects earnings or losses on plannonqualified deferred compensation account balances in 2017.2023. Earnings may increase or decrease depending on the performance of the elected investment options. Earnings on these plans are not “above-market” and thus are not reported in the “2017“2023 Summary Compensation Table.” Plan balances may be invested in various mutual funds and common stock. Investment returns on those funds and common stock ranged from 1.08%(1.44%) to 33.63%46.71% for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023.

(4)

This column represents the year-end balances of the NEOs’ nonqualified deferred compensation accounts. These balances include NEOs’ and M&T contributions that were included in the Summary Compensation Tables in previous years.years; such contribution amounts were reported each year in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table and are quantified by footnote thereto. Amounts in this column include earnings that were not previously reported in the respective year’s Summary Compensation Table because they were not “above-market” earnings.

(5)

Ms. Meister was not a participant in the Supplemental 401(k) and was not eligible to receive benefits in the Supplemental RAA in 2017.

Overview of Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Plans. M&T maintains twothe Leadership Retirement Savings Plan, a nonqualified deferred compensation plans:plan. See footnote (3) to the Supplemental“2023 Summary Compensation Table” for information regarding M&T Bank’s contribution to the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan andon behalf of each of the M&T Bank Corporation Deferred Bonus Plan (“Deferred Bonus Plan”.)  NEOs for 2023.

Leadership Retirement Savings Plan—Overview

The Deferred Bonus Plan was frozen effective January 1, 2010.  See footnote (3) set forth above in the “2017 Summary Compensation Table.”

52


The SupplementalLeadership Retirement Savings Plan mirrors the tax-qualified,is an unfunded, nonqualified defined contribution plan offered to select members of management and other highly compensated employees of M&T. It is intended to make up for benefits that cannot be provided under the Retirement Savings Plan maintained by M&T in that it consists of two parts: (i) Supplemental 401(k) Plan (“Supplemental 401(k) Plan”) and (ii) Supplemental RAA.  The tax-qualified Retirement Savings Plan provides benefits under both portions updue to the limit set by the Internal Revenue Code onSection 401(a)(17) compensation that can be recognizedlimit. It consists of three components— Leadership Deferral/Match, Leadership RAA and Leadership DEC—and provides benefits in excess of those provided under a tax-qualified plan.  The Supplementalthe Qualified 401(k) and Qualified RAA and DEC components of the Retirement Savings Plan, provides unfunded, nonqualified benefits to select management based on compensation in excess of the Internal Revenue Code limit for tax-qualified plans up to a maximum creditable compensation level of $350,000.which are described below.

74

LOGO


Under the tax-qualified 401(k) (“Qualified(the “Qualified 401(k) Plan”) portioncomponent of the Retirement Savings Plan, a participant may elect to contribute up to 50% of creditable plan compensation (subject to the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit), in which event, the participant will be credited with a matching employer contribution equal to 100% of contributions that do not exceed 3%5% of the participant’s contributions plus 50% of the contributions that exceed 3% but not 6% of the participant’s compensation under the plan.compensation. All participants are always 100% vested in all contributions in the Qualified 401(k) component of the Retirement Savings Plan. All NEOs participate in the Qualified 401(k) component of the Retirement Savings Plan.

Under the Qualified RAA component of the Retirement Savings Plan, a participant hired prior to December 31, 2019 will be credited with an employer contribution based on a percentage of compensation (subject to the Internal Revenue Code 401(a)(17) compensation limit) and the participant’s years of service recognized under the planplan. The employer contribution will be made for each year in which the participant is credited with at least 1,000 hours of service and is employed by M&T on December 31st of such year (or for such years where employment was terminated during the year due to retirement, death or disability). Benefits under the Qualified RAA component are subject to a five-year vesting schedule. As explained in the discussion of the “2017“2023 Pension Benefits Table,” Ms. Meister and Messrs. Jones and King participate in the Qualified RAA, and are fully vested in the Qualified RAA benefits under the plan based on their years of service. Ms. MeisterMr. Kay became eligible to participate in the Qualified RAA in 20172019 and will be subject to a five-year vesting schedule.became fully vested as of December 31, 2023.

The Deferred Bonus Plan was frozen effective January 1, 2010 and does not allow any new deferralsUnder the Qualified DEC component of bonuses into that plan.  Prior to January 1, 2010, the Deferred Bonus Plan allowed select members of management and highly compensated employees of M&T to defer all or a portion of an annual bonus they received under an M&T bonus or incentive plan.

Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, - Supplemental 401(k) Plana participant hired after December 31, 2019 will be credited with an employer contribution based on compensation (subject to the Internal Revenue Code 401(a)(17) compensation limit) multiplied by a discretionary contribution percentage, if any, determined by the bank from year to year. Mr. Bible received a DEC contribution based on 2023 eligible earnings.

Leadership Retirement Savings Plan—Leadership Deferral/Match

The SupplementalLeadership Deferral/Match component of the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan is designed to provide compensation deferral opportunities and matching contributions that cannot be provided under the Qualified 401(k) component of the Retirement Savings Plan provides unfunded, nonqualified benefitsdue to select membersthe Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit. With the exception of management and highly compensated employees of M&T.  AllMr. Bible who was not eligible for the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan in 2023, all of the NEOs participate in the Supplemental 401(k) Plan.Leadership Deferral/Match component.

For a given year,Under the Leadership Deferral/Match component, a participant may elect to contribute up to 50% of creditable plan compensation, andcapped at two times the annual Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit. The participant must elect the contribution percentage before the beginning of the plan year. A participantFor 2023, the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit was $330,000 resulting in a compensation maximum of $660,000.

Additionally, select members of management who contributescontribute to the Supplemental 401(k) PlanLeadership Deferral/Match component for a given plan year isand have maximized their Qualified 401(k) contributions are credited with a matching employer contribution under the Supplemental 401(k) PlanLeadership Deferral/Match component, determined under the same matching formula as in the Qualified 401(k) component of the Retirement Savings Plan which generally provides for a match equal(equal to 100% of contributions that do not exceed 3%5% of the participant’s compensation plus 50%compensation). With the exception of Mr. Bible who was not eligible for the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan in 2023, all of the NEOs were credited with a maximum company matching contribution of $16,500 under the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan for the 2023 plan year. Company matching contributions that exceed 3% but not 6%for 2023 under the Leadership Deferral/Match component are credited to the participant’s bookkeeping account in the first quarter of 2024. These values are also reflected in the “Leadership Retirement Savings Plan” column set forth in footnote (3) of the participant’s compensation.  Creditable compensation under the Supplemental 401(k) Plan is defined in the same way as under the Qualified Pension Plan, but it includes amounts deferred by participants under the Supplemental 401(k) Plan and includes compensation credited under the tax-qualified 401(k) plan, the Retirement Savings Plan.  The maximum creditable compensation for the plan in any year is $350,000.“2023 Summary Compensation Table.”

 

LOGO

 

75

53


A participant is always 100% vested in both his or her own contributions and the employer matching contributions, and all earnings on both types of contributionsthereon under the Supplemental 401(k) Plan.Leadership Deferral/Match component. The planLeadership Retirement Savings Plan provides that a participant may elect to receive benefits at a specified age or date, upon separation from service, at death or disability, or at the earliest of these events. A participant may elect to receive benefits in the form of a single lump sum or in annual installments payable over 5 or 10 years. Elections are made with respect to each year’s contribution to the Supplemental 401(k) PlanLeadership Deferral/Match component prior to the beginning of each plan year. All payments from the Supplemental 401(k) PlanLeadership Deferral/Match component are made in the form of cash.

SupplementalLeadership Retirement Savings Plan - SupplementalPlan—Leadership Retirement Accumulation Account and Leadership Discretionary Employer Contribution

The SupplementalLeadership RAA portioncomponent of the SupplementalLeadership Retirement Savings Plan is designed to provide participants with benefits that cannot be provided under our qualified plansthe Qualified RAA and DEC as a result of limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit. Ms. Meister and Messrs. Jones, King and KingKay participated in the Supplemental RAA. Ms. MeisterLeadership RAA in the 2023 plan year. Mr. Kay became eligible for the SupplementalLeadership RAA in 2017.2019. Mr. Bible will be eligible for the Leadership DEC in the 2024 plan year.

For a given plan year, the SupplementalLeadership RAA and DEC component credits a contribution on behalf of a participant that is equal to the difference between (1) the contribution that would be provided based on planthe participant’s compensation under the Qualified RAA and DEC if the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit did not exist, up to two times the Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan compensationInternal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit, of $350,000, and (2) the contribution actually provided under the Qualified RAA.RAA and DEC. Mr. Jones was credited with $4,600a Leadership RAA contribution of $21,450 for the 20172023 plan year. Mr. King was credited with $3,400Leadership RAA contribution of $16,500 for the 20172023 plan year. Ms. Meister was not eligible to receivereceived a benefitLeadership RAA contribution of $9,075 for the 20172023 plan year and Mr. Kay received a Leadership RAA contribution of $7,425 for the 2023 plan year. The book reserve accounts attributable to SupplementalLeadership RAA contributions are subject to the same vesting schedule as the accounts in the Qualified RAA, and Ms. Meister and Messrs. Jones, King and KingKay are fully vested in their SupplementalLeadership RAA account. BenefitsCompany contributions for 2023 under the SupplementalLeadership RAA andare credited to the Supplemental 401(k) Plan are payableparticipant’s bookkeeping account in the first quarter of 2018.2024. Service increditing for the SupplementalLeadership RAA is determined in the same manner as under the Qualified RAA.

Deferred Bonus Plan

Through December 31, 2009, the Deferred Bonus Plan allowed select members of management and highly compensated employees of M&T to defer all or a portion of an annual bonus award they received under an M&T bonus or incentive plan.  Deferrals under the Deferred Bonus Plan were discontinued as of December 31, 2009, although Mr. Gold has an account These values are also reflected in the Deferred Bonus Plan as of December 31, 2017 resulting from prior years’ deferrals, and he received a cash distribution under the plan“Leadership Retirement Accumulation Account” column set forth in accordance with an election made under the plan in 1998.

When the Deferred Bonus Plan was active, an eligible employee could elect to defer a specific percentage or a dollar amountfootnote (3) of the award, with a minimum deferral of $10,000.  A participant could elect to defer such amount for a period of 5 to 20 years and could elect to receive the deferred account balance in a single lump sum or in annual installments over 5 or 10 years.  If the participant’s employment ends prior to the time all deferrals have been distributed, the deferral period ends and payments commence in the form elected.  Participants are always 100% vested in their deferred account balance.“2023 Summary Compensation Table.”

 

76

54

 

LOGO


Potential Payments Upon TerminationTermination or Change-in-ControlChange in Control

The following table indicates the potential post-employment payments and benefits for the NEOs in the event that eitherevents indicated below as though termination of the following hademployment occurred on December 31, 2017:  (i) an involuntary2023.

M&T maintains certain arrangements, plans and programs under which our NEOs would be eligible to receive severance payments and other benefits upon termination of employment or (ii) a change-in-control event accompanied by an involuntarychange in control of the company. M&T also sponsors a number of broad-based health, life and disability benefit programs for its employees, in which the NEOs also participate, such as short- and long-term disability coverage and group term life insurance coverage, which are not included below.

While our plans provide for the payout amounts indicated below, actual amounts that M&T may pay out and the assumptions used in arriving at such amount can only be determined at the time of such executive’s termination of employment.or change in control and could differ materially from the amounts set forth below. Our plans do not provide for any payment at, following or in connection with a termination for cause.

20172023 Post-Employment Benefits(1)

Name

Severance

Pay(2)

 

Health

Benefit

Coverage

 

Value of Equity

Awards

 

Total Benefits

Upon

Involuntary

Termination

 

Total Benefits

Upon

Involuntary

Termination

Preceded by

Change-in-

Control Event

 

Robert G. Wilmers

$

1,950,000

 

$

42,454

 

$

-

 

$

1,992,454

 

$

1,992,454

 

René F. Jones

$

1,490,000

 

$

21,627

 

$

2,931,795

 

$

1,511,627

 

$

4,443,422

 

Darren J. King

$

1,300,000

 

$

20,442

 

$

1,917,824

 

$

1,320,442

 

$

3,238,266

 

Richard S. Gold

$

1,490,000

 

$

23,030

 

$

2,931,795

 

$

1,513,030

 

$

4,444,825

 

Kevin J. Pearson

$

1,490,000

 

$

29,852

 

$

3,077,649

 

$

1,519,852

 

$

4,597,501

 

Doris P. Meister

$

1,600,000

 

$

32,354

 

$

916,164

 

$

1,632,354

 

$

2,548,518

 

Name

  

Involuntary /
without cause
(1)

($)

   

Death /
Disability
(2)

($)

   

Retirement(3)

($)

   

Change in
Control
(4)

($)

 

René F. Jones(5)

                    

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

   2,241,163    —     —     2,241,163 

LTI(6)

   5,947,887    8,179,755    8,179,755    8,179,755 

Total 

   8,189,050    8,179,755    8,179,755    10,420,918 

Daryl Bible(7)

                    

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

   1,521,774    —     —     1,521,774 

LTI(6)

   2,450,442    2,450,442    —     2,450,442 

Total 

   3,972,216    2,450,442    —     3,972,216 

Darren J. King(5)(7)

                    

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

   1,438,552    —     —     1,438,552 

LTI(6)

   1,813,821    2,504,772    —     2,504,772 

Total 

   3,252,373    2,504,772    —     3,943,324 

Kevin J. Pearson(5)

                    

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

   1,592,024    —     —     1,592,024 

LTI(6)

   2,656,067    3,613,811    3,613,811    3,613,811 

Total 

   4,248,091    3,613,811    3,613,811    5,205,835 

Christopher E. Kay(5)(7)

                    

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

   1,489,926    —     —     1,489,926 

LTI(6)

   1,544,380    2,092,721    —     2,092,721 

Total 

   3,034,306    2,092,721    —     3,582,647 

Doris Meister(5)(8)

                    

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

   1,645,255    —     —     1,645,255 

LTI(6)

   1,536,032    2,131,243    2,131,243    2,131,243 

Total 

   3,181,287    2,131,243    2,131,243    3,776,498 

(1)

In the event of an involuntary termination without cause (i) unvested PVSUs will accelerate at target, but the payout will be prorated to reflect number of employment, NEOsmonths of service provided over the 36-month performance period; (ii) unvested PHSUs will accelerate at target and (iii) NQ Stock Options continue to vest for one year following termination and the exercise period ends on the earlier of one year following termination or the original 10-year expiration date.

LOGO

77


(2)

All vesting restrictions lapse immediately upon death or disability at target.

(3)

For employees who resign and are entitledretirement eligible (defined as having reached age 55 with 10 or more years of service or as otherwise provided under an employee’s equity award agreement) (i) all vesting restrictions on PHSUs lapse immediately and (ii) PVSUs and NQ Stock Options continue to vest pursuant to their original vesting schedule and the exercise period for NQ Stock Options ends on the earlier of 4 years following retirement or the original 10 year expiration date.

(4)

In the event of a change in control, all vesting restrictions will lapse. With respect to the accelerated vestingPVSUs, the payout will be at an amount equal to the greater of equity awardstarget or actual performance, calculated as of the quarter end immediately prior to the change in control announcement. For purposes of this disclosure, a payout at target is assumed. Cash severance is payable only if such involuntaryupon a termination is preceded by a change-in-control event.of employment.

(5)

(2)

AssumesSee the NEO would receive“Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” column of the maximum potential severance“2023 Pension Benefits” table and the “Aggregate Balance at Last FYE” column of 104 weeks of cash base salary.the “2023 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table for additional payments upon termination.

(6)

Value computed for each stock option grant by multiplying (i) the difference between (a) $137.08, the closing market price of a share of our common stock on December 29, 2023 and (b) the exercise price per share for that option granted by (ii) the number of shares subject to each option that vests or continues to vest. PHSUs and PVSUs are valued at target based on the closing market price of a share of our common stock on December 29, 2023.

(7)

Messrs. Bible, King and Kay are not retirement eligible.

(8)

On February 9, 2024, M&T and Ms. Meister entered in a Retirement and Consulting Agreement in connection with Ms. Meister’s transition to a consulting role with the company, which will be effective on or about May 31, 2024. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Individual Performance Assessments—Ms. Meister’s Retirement and Consulting Agreement” for information on Ms. Meister’s post-employment benefits in connection with her pending retirement.

Severance Pay Plan

M&T maintains the Severance Pay Plan, which is a broad-based, tiered severance plan that provides eligible employees with post-employment severance payments and the continuation of certain employee benefits when a “Qualifying Event” (defined as any permanent, involuntary termination of a participant’s active employment as a result of a reduction in force, restructuring, outsourcing or elimination of position) occurs. The amount of severance an employee is eligible to receive is based upon the employee’s position and years of service. Each NEO participates in the plan. Upon the occurrence of a Qualifying Event, each NEO will be entitled to:

the continuation of his or her cash base salary for at least 52 weeks, but in no event more than 104 weeks as determined at the time of the Qualifying Event; and

the continuation of certain benefits duringfor up to the periodfirst 18 months in which severance payments are made, for those benefits that the NEO has elected at the time of the Qualifying Event, which may include medical, dental, vision and life insurance, and flexible spending accounts, provided the NEO continues to make contributions at the active employee rate.

Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards

As a general matter, all employees, including the NEOs, would be immediately vested in any unvested equity awards that were granted under M&T’s various equity compensation plans at the time of change-in-control,a change in control, death disability orand disability. Unvested shares of PHSUs granted to the NEOs will also vest automatically at retirement. Unvested shares of performance-based equity awards granted to Messrs. Jones, Gold and PearsonPVSUs will vest automatically at change-in-control,target in the case of death or disability, butat the greater of target or actual performance in the event of a change in control, and will not acceleratecontinue vesting into retirement, subject to actual performance according to the original payout schedule. The NQ Stock Options also continue to vest according to the original schedule upon retirement, and vest after retirement until such time as the performance requirementexercise period is deemedshortened to have been met for the year in whichlesser of four years post-retirement or the retirement occurred.remaining original term. See also footnote (2)(3) to the table titled “2017“2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards.”

 

78

 

55LOGO


Pay Versus Performance Disclosure
In accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, we provide the following disclosure regarding executive compensation for our principal executive officer (“PEO,” also known as our CEO), and other NEOs and company performance for the fiscal years listed below. The C&HC Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for any of the years shown. Pursuant to SEC rules, the information in this “
Pay Versus Performance Disclosure
” section shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any M&T filing under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, unless expressly incorporated by specific reference in such filing.
Pay Versus Performance Table
Year
  
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
René F. Jones¹
($)
   
Compensation
Actually Paid to
René F. Jones¹,²,³
($)
   
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO NEOs
1

($)
   
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO

NEOs
1,2,3

($)
   
Value of Initial Fixed
$100 Investment
based on:
4
   
Net
Income
($ Millions)
   
Return on
Tangible
Common
Equity
5
 
  
TSR
($)
   
Peer Group
TSR
($)
 
(a)
  
(b)
   
(c)
   
(d)
   
(e)
   
(f)
   
(g)
   
(h)
   
(i)
 
2023   9,385,557    9,677,118    3,852,702    3,883,837    92.38    96.65    2,741    17.6
2022   8,815,707    8,747,318    4,052,188    4,106,681    93.94    97.52    1,992    16.7
2021   6,868,174    9,143,656    3,554,911    4,583,251    96.83    124.06    1,859    16.8
2020   5,532,007    3,876,327    3,254,389    2,358,820    77.91    89.69    1,353    12.8
1.
Mr. Jones was our PEO for each year presented. The individuals comprising the
non-PEO
NEOs for each year presented are listed below.
2020—2021
 
2022
  
2023
Darren J. King Darren J. King  Daryl Bible
Richard S. Gold Richard S. Gold  Darren J. King
Kevin J. Pearson Kevin J. Pearson  Kevin J. Pearson
Doris P. Meister Christopher E. Kay  Christopher E. Kay
     Doris P. Meister
2.
The amounts shown for Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K
and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized, or received by M&T’s NEOs. These amounts reflect the Summary Compensation Table Total with certain adjustments as described in footnote 3 below.
3.Compensation Actually Paid reflects the exclusions and inclusions of certain amounts for the PEO and the other NEOs as set forth below. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and valuation assumptions do not differ materially from those disclosed as of the grant date of the equity awards. Amounts in the Exclusion of Stock Awards and Option Awards column are the totals from the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. Amounts in the Exclusion of Change in Pension Value column reflect the amounts attributable to the Change in Pension Value reported in the Summary Compensation Table. Amounts in the Inclusion of Pension Service Cost are based on the service cost for services rendered during the listed year.
Year
  
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Exclusion of
Change in Pension
Value for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Exclusion of Stock
Awards and
Option Awards for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Inclusion of
Pension Service
Cost for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Inclusion of Equity
Values for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Compensation
Actually Paid to
René F. Jones
($)
 
2023   9,385,557    (11,982   (6,000,130   —     6,303,673    9,677,118 
2022   8,815,707    —     (5,300,278   —     5,231,889    8,747,318 
2021   6,868,174    —     (4,250,256   —     6,525,738    9,143,656 
2020   5,532,007    (66,115   (3,550,087   —     1,960,522    3,876,327 
LOGO
79

Year
  
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
   
Average
Exclusion of
Change in Pension
Value for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
   
Average
Exclusion of Stock
Awards and
Option Awards for
Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
   
Average
Inclusion of
Pension Service
Cost for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
   
Average
Inclusion of Equity
Values for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
   
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
 
2023   3,852,702    (33,416   (2,045,257   15,680    2,094,128    3,883,837 
2022   4,052,188    —     (1,875,129   50,522    1,879,100    4,106,681 
2021   3,554,911    (44,980   (1,794,940   51,600    2,816,660    4,583,251 
2020   3,254,389    (186,823   (1,697,711   44,846    944,119    2,358,820 
The amounts in the Inclusion of Equity Values in the tables above are derived from the amounts set forth in the following tables:
Year
  
Year-End Fair

Value of Equity
Awards Granted
During Year
That Remained
Unvested as of
Last Day of
Year for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Change in Fair
Value from Last
Day of Prior
Year to Last Day
of Year of
Unvested Equity
Awards Granted
in Prior Years for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Vesting-Date

Fair Value of
Equity Awards
Granted
During Year
that Vested
During Year for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Change in Fair
Value from Last
Day of Prior Year
to Vesting Date of
Unvested Equity
Awards Granted
in Prior Years that
Vested During
Year for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Fair Value at
Last Day of
Prior Year of
Equity
Awards
Forfeited
During Year for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Value of
Dividends or
Other Earnings
Paid on Equity
Awards Not
Otherwise
Included for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Total -
Inclusion
of Equity
Values for
René F. Jones
($)
 
2023   5,237,834    (110,045   —     1,175,884    —     —     6,303,673 
2022   4,560,864    (10,132   —     681,157    —     —     5,231,889 
2021   5,243,324    912,355    —     370,059    —     —     6,525,738 
2020   2,537,896    (542,301   —     (35,073   —     —     1,960,522 
Year
 
Average
Year-End Fair

Value of Equity
Awards Granted
During Year
That Remained
Unvested as of
Last Day of
Year for
Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
  
Average
Change in Fair
Value from Last
Day of Prior
Year to Last Day
of Year of
Unvested Equity
Awards Granted
in Prior Years for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
  
Average
Vesting-Date
Fair Value of
Equity Awards
Granted
During Year
that Vested
During Year for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
  
Average
Change in Fair
Value from Last
Day of Prior Year
to Vesting Date of
Unvested Equity
Awards Granted
in Prior Years that
Vested During
Year for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
  
Average
Fair Value at
Last Day of
Prior Year of
Equity
Awards
Forfeited
During Year for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
  
Average
Value of
Dividends or
Other Earnings
Paid on Equity
Awards Not
Otherwise
Included for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
  
Total -
Average
Inclusion
of Equity
Values for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
 
2023  1,848,301   (53,473  —    299,300   —    —    2,094,128 
2022  1,613,539   (8,580  —    274,141   —    —    1,879,100 
2021  2,214,324   429,158   —    173,178   —    —    2,816,660 
2020  1,221,813   (259,702  —    (17,992  —    —    944,119 
4.
The Peer Group TSR set forth in this table utilizes the KBW NASDAQ Bank Index (assuming reinvestment of all dividends), which we also utilize in the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation
S-K
included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2023. The comparison assumes $100 was invested for the period starting December 31, 2019, through the end of the listed year in the company and in the KBW NASDAQ Bank Index, respectively, and assumes reinvestment of all dividends. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.
5.
We determined Return on Tangible Common Equity (ROTCE) to be the most important financial performance measure used to link company performance to Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and
Non-PEO
NEOs in 2022 and 2023. This performance measure may not have been the most important financial performance measure for years 2021 and 2020 and we may determine a different financial performance measure to be the most important financial performance measure in future years. ROTCE is computed by dividing net operating income available to common equity by average tangible common equity. Net operating income available to common equity is computed by taking net income available to common equity and adding back the
after-tax
effect of the amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, adding back the
after-tax
effects of merger-related expenses, and subtracting the
after-tax
effects of merger-related gains. Average tangible common equity is computed by taking average common equity for the applicable period and subtracting average goodwill and average core deposit and other intangible assets (net of any related average deferred tax amounts). The C&HC Committee and management use these
non-GAAP
financial measures as they believe they better reflect the impact of acquisition activity in reported results. See
Appendix A
for a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with these corresponding
non-GAAP
amounts.
80
LOGO

Description of Relationship Between PEO and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid, Company Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) and KBW NASDAQ Bank Index TSR
The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, the company’s cumulative TSR, and the TSR of the KBW NASDAQ Bank Index over the four most recently completed fisca
l years.
Description of Relationship Between PEO and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income
The fo
llowing chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO,
the
average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and our Net Income during the four most recently completed fiscal years.
LOGO
LOGO
81

Description of Relationship Between PEO and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid and ROTCE
The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and our ROTCE during the four most recently completed fiscal years. See
Appendix A
for a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with these corresponding
non-GAAP
amounts
.
LOGO
Tabular List of Most Important Financial Performance Measures
The following table presents the financial performance measures that the company considers to have been the most important in linking Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and other NEOs for 2023 to company performance. The measures in this table are not ranked.
Net Operating Income
Earnings Per Share
Return on Tangible Common Equity
82
LOGO

PROPOSAL 3


 PROPOSAL 3

PROPOSAL TO RATIFYRATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF M&T BANK CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 20182024

On February 20, 2018,2024, the Audit Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, certified public accountants, as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2018,2024, a capacity in which it has served since 1984.

Although shareholder approval of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm is not required by law, M&T believes that it is desirable to request that the shareholders ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as M&T’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018.2024. In the event that the shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider thisthe appointment and make such a determination asthat it believes to be in M&T’s and its shareholders’ best interests. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in M&T’s and its shareholders’ best interests.

Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the virtual Annual Meeting. The representatives may, if they wish, make a statement and, it is expected, will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION

OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF M&T BANK CORPORATION FOR THE

YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2024.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION
OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF M&T BANK CORPORATION FOR THE
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2018.

LOGO

83

 

56


INDEPENDENTINDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

The following is a summary of the fees billed to M&T by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for professional services rendered during 20172023 and 2016,2022, which are categorized in accordance with the SEC’s rules as follows:

Fees to Independent Auditors

 

2017

 

2016

 

  2023 ($)   2022 ($) 

Audit Fees

$

3,778,350

 

$

3,303,821

 

   7,567,221    8,714,596 

Audit-Related Fees

$

1,064,040

 

$

1,103,005

 

   1,820,528    1,484,641 

Tax Fees

$

117,000

 

$

139,000

 

   428,793    258,137 

All Other Fees

$

6,764

 

$

6,764

 

   2,175    979 

Total

$

4,966,154

 

$

4,552,590

 

   9,818,717    10,458,353 

Audit Fees

Audit fees consist of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for services rendered for the audit of M&T’s annual consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, for its review of M&T’s quarterly consolidated financial statements during 20172023 and 2016,2022, and for other audit and attest services in connection with statutory and regulatory filings as of and for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2016.2022.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees consist of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for audit-related services, including audits of employee benefit plans and other attest services that are not required by statute or regulation for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2016.2022. Of the audit-related fees billed for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, all services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Tax Fees

Tax fees consist of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for tax compliance, planning and consulting for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2016.2022. Of the tax fees billed for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, all services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

All Other Fees

All other fees for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 consisted of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP primarily for researchaccounting disclosure software licensing. All fees billed in this category for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

In addition to the above services, for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP billed $59,850$77,607 for a mortgage servicing report that was reimbursed by an outside mortgage company, directly billed certain trusts, for which a subsidiary of M&T was the trustee, $27,000$278,600 for tax return preparation services, and directly billed certain investment funds sponsored by a subsidiary of M&T a total of $414,800$522,500 for audit services and Form 5500 preparation fees. Likewise, for the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP billed $57,000$74,622 for a mortgage servicing report that was reimbursed by an outside mortgage company, directly billed certain trusts, for which a subsidiary of M&T was trustee, $258,600 for tax return preparation services, and directly billed certain investment funds sponsored by a subsidiary of M&T a total of $253,964$526,345 for audit services and Form 5500 preparation fees.

 

84

 

57LOGO


The Audit Committee has determined that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s provision of professional services is compatible with maintaining its independence. No fees were billed and no services were provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during 20172023 and 20162022 for financial information systems design and implementation.

No other fees were billed for any other services and no other services were provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2016.2022.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Beginning with the year ended December 31, 2003, M&T instituted a policy that the Audit Committee pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget range. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval policy, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve additional services on a case-by-case basis. In the period between scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee, the Chair of the Audit Committee is authorized to pre-approve such services on behalf of the Audit Committee provided that such pre-approval is reported to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Before appointing PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit Committee considered PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s qualifications as an independent registered public accounting firm. This included a review of the qualifications of the engagement team, the quality control procedures the firm has established, any issues raised by the most recent quality control review of the firm, as well as its reputation for integrity and competence in the fields of accounting and auditing. The Audit Committee’s review also included matters required to be considered under the SEC’s rules on auditor independence, including the nature and extent of non-audit services, to ensure that the auditor’s independence will not be impaired. The Audit Committee has considered and determined that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s provision of non-audit services to M&T during 20172023 is compatible with and did not impair PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence.

Report of the Audit Committee

The members of the Audit Committee are independent as that term is defined in the listing standards of the NYSE. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.Board. A copy of such charter can be accessed on M&T’s website at www.ir.mtb.com/corpgov.cfm.ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance. During 2017,2023, the Audit Committee met six14 times, and held discussions with management and representatives of its independent registered public accounting firm consistent with its responsibilities under its charter.

Management is responsible for the preparation of M&T’s consolidated financial statements and their assessment of the design and effectiveness of M&T’s internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of M&T’s consolidated financial statements and opining on the effectiveness of those controls in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and

58


issuing its reports thereon. As provided in its charter, the Audit Committee’s responsibilities include monitoring and overseeing these processes.

LOGO

85


In discharging its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed M&T’s 20172023 audited consolidated financial statements with management and its independent registered public accounting firm and has reviewed and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm all communicationsthe matters required to be discussed by standardsthe applicable requirements of the PCAOB includingand the matters described in PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16, (Communication with Audit Committees),SEC, which include, among other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of M&T’s consolidated financial statements.

The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from M&T’s independent registered public accounting firm as required by the PCAOB’s Ethics and Independence Rule 3526 (Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence) and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm theirits independence.

Based on these reviews and discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements and report on management’s assessment of the design and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting be included in M&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172023 to be filed with the SEC on or about February 22, 2018.21, 2024. The Audit Committee also selected the independent registered public accounting firm.

This report was adopted on February 20, 20182024 by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors:

C. Angela Bontempo, Chair

Richard A. GrossiBoard:

Denis J. Salamone, Chair

David S. ScharfsteinWilliam F. Cruger, Jr.

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

Herbert L. Washington

In accordance with and to the extent permitted by applicable law or regulation, the information contained in the Report of the Audit Committee of M&T Bank Corporation shall not be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act and shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

59


NOTICE PURSUANT TO SECTION 726(d) OF THETHE NEW YORK BUSINESS CORPORATION LAW

On OctoberMay 1, 2017,2023, M&T renewed and extended its directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy until OctoberMay 1, 2018.2024. The premium, including commissions, for the extension and annual renewal is $2,551,606.$5,717,286. The primary policy is issued by U.S. Specialty Insurance Company and covers all directors and officers of M&T and its subsidiaries.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors of M&T is not aware of any matters not referred to in this proxy statement that will be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote the shares represented thereby in accordance with their best judgment.

 

86

60

 

LOGO


GENERAL INFORMATION—QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

 


Why am I being provided this proxy statement?

. IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION Electronic Voting Instructions Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailingM&T is providing this proxy statement to you because its Board is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares of M&T common stock at the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or adjournments thereof. This proxy statement contains information about matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting and certain other information required by the SEC and the NYSE.

We are first making available this proxy statement and the accompanying form of proxy on or about March 5, 2024, to M&T common stock shareholders of record as of February 22, 2024. A copy of M&T’s message to shareholders and Form 10-K, including financial statements, which together comprise our annual report for the year 2023, are being made available along with this proxy statement but are not part of this proxy statement.

When and where will the Annual Meeting be held?

The Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 16, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time. We are holding this year’s Annual Meeting in a virtual meeting format. There is no physical location for the meeting.

Who is entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Common shareholders of record at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on February 22, 2024 are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. On February 22, 2024, M&T had outstanding 166,620,984 shares of common stock, $0.50 par value per share. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote. Shares may not be voted at the Annual Meeting unless the owner is present or represented by proxy, as more fully explained in this proxy statement.

How do I attend, vote and ask questions at the Annual Meeting?

You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting if, as of the close of business on February 22, 2024, you held shares of M&T common stock registered in your name (a “Registered Holder”), or you held shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, and have a valid legal proxy for the Annual Meeting (a “Beneficial Holder”).

If you are a Registered Holder or Beneficial Holder, you will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, ask questions and vote during the meeting by visiting meetnow.global/MKWPZGK and following the instructions. Please have your control number, which can be found on your proxy card, notice or email previously received, to access the meeting. Please review this information prior to the Annual Meeting to ensure you have access.

We encourage shareholders to visit the meeting website above in advance of the Annual Meeting to familiarize themselves with the online access process. While we expect that the vast majority of Beneficial Holders will be able to fully participate using the control number received with their voting instruction form, there is no guarantee this option will be available for every type of Beneficial Holders’ voting control numbers. Beneficial Holders also have the option to register in advance of the Annual Meeting as described more fully below. The virtual Annual Meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (except Internet Explorer) and devices that are equipped with the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Shareholders should verify their internet connection prior to the Annual Meeting.

Shareholders encountering difficulty with the Annual Meeting virtual platform during the sign-in process or at any time during the meeting may utilize technical support provided by M&T through Computershare by calling 1-888-724-2416. Technical support information also is provided on the sign-in page for all shareholders.

LOGO

87


Shareholders will have substantially the same opportunities to participate in our virtual Annual Meeting as they would have at an in-person meeting. Shareholders as of the record date will be able to attend, vote, examine the shareholder list, and submit questions during a portion of the meeting via the online platform. Shareholders may also submit questions in advance of the Annual Meeting by sending them via email to: ir@mtb.com. Please send any questions in advance of the Annual Meeting by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 12, 2024.

Questions that comply with the Annual Meeting’s rules of conduct and that are germane to the purpose of the Annual Meeting will be answered during the meeting, subject to time constraints. If there are questions regarding matters of personal concern to the shareholder or if a question posed is not answered, M&T’s Market & Investor Relations Department will respond after the Annual Meeting. If we receive substantially similar questions from multiple shareholders, we may group them together. Prior to the Annual Meeting, the meeting website will contain details on other procedures and guidelines relevant to the Annual Meeting as well as technical support information.

Even if you intend to be present at the virtual Annual Meeting, to ensure your shares are represented, please vote your shares in advance of the meeting over the internet or by telephone, or complete and return a physical proxy card by mail.

Do I have to register in advance of the Annual Meeting if I want to attend?

If you are a Beneficial Holder, you may choose oneto register before the Annual Meeting by submitting proof of your proxy power (“Legal Proxy”) reflecting your M&T holdings along with your name and email address to Computershare as described below. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Thursday, April 11, 2024. You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email after Computershare receives your registration materials. Requests for registration should be directed to Computershare at the following addresses:

By email: Forward the email from your broker granting you a Legal Proxy, or attach an image of your Legal Proxy, to legalproxy@computershare.com.

By mail: Computershare, M&T Bank Corporation Legal Proxy, P.O. Box 43001, Providence, RI 02940-3001.

What is the difference between a Registered Holder and a Beneficial Holder?

If your shares of M&T common stock are registered in your name with M&T’s transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered to be a Registered Holder. M&T will mail the notice directly to you (or will mail the printed proxy materials, including a proxy card, as requested).

If your shares of M&T common stock are held by a broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary, then that intermediary is considered the shareholder of record, the shares are considered held in “street name,” and you are considered to be a Beneficial Holder. This intermediary will send the notice to you (or will send the printed proxy materials with the intermediary’s voting instruction card, as requested).

As the Beneficial Holder of the voting methods outlined belowshares, you have the right to direct your intermediary on how to vote and you are also invited to attend the virtual Annual Meeting. However, if you are a Beneficial Holder, you are not the shareholder of record and in order to vote your proxy. YOUR CONTROL NUMBER IS LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxiesshares during the meeting you must follow the instructions from your intermediary. Please refer to the information your intermediary provided to you. NYSE rules do not permit an intermediary to vote street name shares on “non-routine” matters, such as the election of directors and advisory vote to approve the 2023 compensation of M&T’s NEOs, unless it has received voting instructions from the beneficial holder. M&T encourages Beneficial Holders to promptly direct their intermediary on how to vote their shares for the agenda items.

88

LOGO


How are we distributing our proxy materials?

To expedite delivery, reduce costs and decrease the environmental impact of our proxy materials, we are again using an SEC rule known as “Notice and Access” that allows us to furnish proxy materials over the internet instead of mailing paper copies of those materials to each shareholder. As a result, beginning on or about March 5, 2024, shareholders were sent a Notice of Internet Availability containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including this proxy statement, as well as the message to shareholders and Form 10-K that together comprise our annual report for 2023, over the internet. If you received the notice, you will not receive paper copies of the proxy materials unless you request the materials by following the instructions in the notice. The notice is not a proxy card that can be submitted to vote your shares. Instead, the notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials. The notice also instructs you on how to vote via the Internet or telephone must beinternet. Shareholders who have requested paper copies of the proxy materials will receive printed copies in the mail.

If you received by1:00 a.m., EDT, on April 17, 2018. Vote viapaper copies of the Internet • Goproxy materials, but instead in the future would like to www.investorvote.com/MTB • Or scanreceive only the QR code with your smartphone • Follow the steps outlined on the secure website Vote via the telephone • Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada on a touch tone telephone • Followproxy materials electronically, you can elect to do so by: (i) following the instructions provided in the proxy card, if your shares are registered in your name (i.e., a Registered Holder), or (ii) by contacting your broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary, if you hold your shares in street name (i.e., a Beneficial Holder).

How can I vote by proxy?

You can vote by proxy by following the internet or telephone voting procedures described on the notice or proxy card or by completing and returning a physical proxy card or, if you are a Beneficial Holder and hold your shares in street name, by following the voting instruction card you receive from your broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary. The internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate that you are a shareholder by use of a control number and allow you to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you are a Registered Holder, the method by which you vote will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you later decide to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, as described above.

May I revoke my proxy?

How you hold your shares (Registered Holder or Beneficial Holder) determines how and when you may revoke your proxy. A Registered Holder may revoke a proxy that has been previously given at any time before it is exercised by giving written notice of such revocation or by delivering a later dated proxy, in either case, to the Corporate Secretary, at One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203, or by attending and voting during the virtual Annual Meeting. A Beneficial Holder of shares in street name must follow the instructions from his or her broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary to revoke a previously given proxy.

How will my proxy be voted?

Your proxy will be voted in accordance with the directions you provide. If you sign, date and return your proxy card but do not specify how you want to vote your shares, your shares will be voted FOR the election as directors of the 16 persons named under the section titled “Nominees for Director;FOR approving, on an advisory basis, the 2023 compensation of M&T’s NEOs; and FOR ratifying the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2024.

LOGO

89


What is required for a quorum at the Annual Meeting?

The presence, or presence by proxy, of the holders of record of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes will be counted as being present or represented at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum, but, under NYSE rules, brokers will not be permitted to vote in the election of directors or the advisory vote to approve the 2023 compensation of M&T’s NEOs, unless specific voting instructions are provided to the broker. We therefore encourage Beneficial Holders whose shares are held in street name to direct the vote of their shares for all agenda items on the form of proxy or instruction card sent by their broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary.

What approval is necessary for Proposal 1 and what happens if an incumbent director nominee does not receive a majority of votes in favor of his or her election?

Pursuant to M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, in an uncontested election of directors, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the nominee is required for the election of such nominee as a director, assuming a quorum is present or represented at the Annual Meeting. This means that the number of votes cast “for” a particular nominee for director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” the nominee for director. If an incumbent director receives more “against” votes than “for” votes in an uncontested election, that director would still be elected, but would be required to tender his or her resignation to the Board for consideration in accordance with M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws.

What approval is necessary to approve Proposals 2 and 3?

For Proposals 2 and 3, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, which means the number of votes cast “for” the proposal must exceed the number of votes cast “against,” is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the 2023 compensation of M&T’s NEOs (Proposal 2) and the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2024 (Proposal 3).

How are abstentions and broker non-votes counted?

Abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. However, an abstention will not constitute a vote cast and therefore will not affect the outcome of the vote on the election of directors (Proposal 1), the advisory vote to approve the 2023 compensation of M&T’s NEOs (Proposal 2), or the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2024 (Proposal 3).

Broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. However, broker non-votes will not constitute votes cast for the election of directors (Proposal 1) or for the approval of the 2023 compensation of M&T’s NEOs (Proposal 2) and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of any of these proposals. A broker or other nominee may generally vote in their discretion on “routine” matters, such as Proposal 3, and therefore no broker non-votes are expected in connection with the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2024 (Proposal 3).

Who is paying for the solicitation of proxies?

M&T will bear the cost of soliciting proxies in the accompanying form of proxy. We are making this solicitation by mail, by telephone and in person using the services of employees of M&T or its subsidiaries at nominal cost. In addition, M&T has retained Georgeson to assist in the solicitation of

90

LOGO


proxies for a fee of approximately $11,000 plus the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and disbursements of that firm. We will reimburse brokers, trustees, banks and other intermediaries for expenses they incur in mailing proxy materials to Beneficial Holders of M&T’s common stock.

How do I propose actions for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders?

SEC Rule 14a-8

In order for a shareholder proposal at next year’s meeting, the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be eligible for inclusion in M&T’s proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8, we must receive the proposal at our principal executive offices no later than November 5, 2024. You must provide your proposal to us in writing and it must comply with the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8.

Advance Notice Procedures

M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws state that no business may be brought before an annual meeting of shareholders unless it is specified in the notice of the meeting or is otherwise brought before the meeting by the recorded messageUsingBoard or by a black ink pen, mark your votesshareholder entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting who has delivered notice to M&T (containing the information specified in M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws) in compliance with the advance notice requirements specified in M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws. Under M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, any such shareholder entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting may nominate an Xindividual for election to the Board or propose other business to be brought directly at an annual meeting of shareholders by giving advance notice to M&T (containing the information specified in M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws) no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which M&T first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders. These advance notice procedures are separate from the SEC’s requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a shareholder proposal included in M&T’s proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 referred to above. A shareholder’s notice of a nomination or other business for consideration at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be delivered by no earlier than October 6, 2024 and no later than November 5, 2024. In addition, pursuant to the SEC’s universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the M&T’s nominees must comply with the additional requirement of Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.

Proxy Access Procedures

M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws permit a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, who has continuously owned at least 3% of the outstanding shares of M&T’s common stock for at least three years to nominate and include in our proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders director nominees constituting up to the greater of two directors or 20% of the total number of directors serving on the Board on the last day on which notice of a nomination may be delivered (known generally as shown“proxy access”).

The proxy access notice must be in writing and contain the information specified in M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws for a proxy access nomination and must be delivered no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which M&T first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders. A shareholder wishing to submit a proxy access notice regarding a nomination for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders should do so no earlier than October 6, 2024 and no later than November 5, 2024.

These proxy access procedures are separate from the advance notice procedures referred to above, from the SEC’s requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a shareholder proposal included in our proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 referred to above, and from the procedures you must follow to submit a director nominee for consideration by the N&G Committee as described in this example. Please do not write outsideproxy statement (see “Nomination and Governance Committeein the designated areas. X Annual Meeting Proxy Card • IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. • A Proposals — The Board of Directorssection titled “Corporate Governance of M&T Bank Corporation recommendsCorporation”).

LOGO

91


How do I discontinue multiple mailings?

In accordance with a vote FORnotice sent to certain shareholders who receive paper copies of the following proposals. +1. TO ELECT 17 DIRECTORS FOR ONE-YEAR TERMS AND UNTIL THEIR SUCCESSORS HAVE BEEN ELECTED AND QUALIFIED. For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold 01 - Brent D. Baird 02 - C. Angela Bontempo 03 - Robert T. Brady 04 - T. Jefferson Cunningham III 05 - Gary N. Geisel 06 - Richard S. Gold 07 - Richard A. Grossi 08 - John D. Hawke, Jr. 09 - René F. Jones 10 - Richard H. Ledgett, Jr. 11 - Newton P.S. Merrill 12 - Melinda R. Rich 13 - Robert E. Sadler, Jr. 14 - Denis J. Salamone 15 - John R. Scannell 16 - David S. Scharfstein 17 - Herbert L. Washington Meeting Attendance Markproxy materials, multiple shareholders sharing a single address will receive only one copy of this proxy statement, the boxmessage to shareholders and Form 10-K, unless we have previously received other instructions. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce printing and postage costs.

If you are a Registered Holder and have more than one account in your name or at the right ifsame address as other shareholders of record, you plan to For Against Abstain attend the Annual Meeting. 2. TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OFmay authorize M&T BANK Materials Preference CORPORATION’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS. Markto discontinue mailings of multiple sets of proxy materials. To discontinue multiple mailings, or to reinstate multiple mailings, please either mail your request to M&T Bank Corporation, Attention: Shareholder Relations, One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203, or send your request to Shareholder Relations via electronic mail at ir@mtb.com.

92

LOGO


Appendix A

Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures

As indicated in this proxy statement, the box toC&HC Committee and management use certain non-GAAP measures, such as Return on Tangible Common Equity (ROTCE), as part of M&T’s executive compensation program, which they believe better reflect the right if you prefer to access your Annual Reportsimpact of acquisition activity in reported results.

Below is a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with corresponding non-GAAP amounts for 2021, 2022 and Proxy 3. TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP Statements online via2023.

   Year ended
12/31/2023
  Year ended
12/31/2022
  Year ended
12/31/2021
 

Income statement data

In millions

    

Net income

  $2,741  $1,992  $1,859 

Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets(a)

   48   43   7 

Merger-related expenses(a)

   —    431   34 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net operating income

   2,789   2,466   1,900 

Less preferred stock dividends

   (100  (97  (73
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net operating income available to common equity

  $2,689  $2,369  $1,827 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance sheet data

In millions

 

    

Average common equity

    

Average total equity

  $25,899  $23,810  $16,909 

Preferred stock

   (2,011  (1,946  (1,438
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Average common equity

   23,888   21,864   15,471 

Goodwill, core deposit and other intangible assets

   (8,650  (7,716  (4,601

Deferred taxes

   44   43   2 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Average tangible common equity

  $15,282  $14,191  $10,872 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net operating return on average tangible common equity

   17.60  16.70  16.80

(a)

After any related tax effect

The company’s three-year average ROTCE of 17.03% for payout of the InternetAS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF instead2021 PVSU grant was calculated by taking the average ROTCE for each of receiving themthe three years in the mail.M&T BANK CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBERperformance period.

ROTCE Description. ROTCE is computed by dividing net operating income available to common equity by average tangible common equity. Net operating income available to common equity is computed by taking net income available to common equity and adding back the after-tax effect of the amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, adding back the after-tax effects of merger-related expenses, and subtracting the after-tax effects of merger-related gains. Average tangible common equity is computed by taking average common equity for the applicable period and subtracting average goodwill and average core deposit and other intangible assets (net of any related average deferred tax amounts).

LOGO

A-1


ROTA Description. As described in this proxy statement, in 2024, the C&HC Committee approved a plan design change for the PVSUs granted in 2024. This updated plan maintains a three-year cliff vesting schedule, but now includes two metrics, ROTCE and Return on Tangible Assets (“ROTA”). ROTA is computed by dividing net operating income by average tangible assets. Net operating income is computed by taking net income and adding back the after-tax effect of the amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, adding back the after-tax effects of merger-related expenses, and subtracting the after-tax effects of merger-related gains. Average tangible assets is computed by taking average common assets for the applicable period and subtracting average goodwill and average core deposit and other intangible assets (net of any related average deferred tax amounts).

As also referenced in this proxy statement, see “Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of M&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTION A ON THIS SIDE AND SECTION C ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS CARD. COMPLETE SECTION B, IF APPLICABLE. PLEASE SIGN AND DATE ON THE REVERSE SIDE. 1PCF 02RM3D2023, for the GAAP reconciliation of, and other information regarding, non-interest operating expenses.

A-2

LOGO


 

 

 


LOGO

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! Proxy materials are available online at: http://ir.mandtbank.com/proxy.cfm IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. • PROXY — M&T BANK CORPORATION Annual Meeting of Shareholders — April 17, 2018, 11:00 a.m., EDT THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby appoints Benjamin C. Abrams, Christopher C. Dyson and Carl J. Montante as Proxies and authorizes said Proxies, or any one ofthem, to represent and to vote all of the shares of common stock ofmtb.com

©2021 M&T Bank Corporation which the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the AnnualMeeting of Shareholders to be held on the 10th floor of One M&T Plaza in Buffalo, New York on Tuesday, April 17, 2018, at 11:00 a.m., EDT, and anyadjournments thereof (i) as designated on the proposals set forth on the reverse side of this card and (ii) at the discretion of said Proxies, or any one of them, on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting. IF PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED OR, IF NOT SPECIFIED, WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL PROPOSALS. PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE OR VOTE VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE. B Change of Address Please print new address below. Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS YOUR NAME(S) APPEAR(S) ON THIS CARD. When signing as an attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title. If a corporation or partnership, write in the full corporate or partnership name and have the President or other authorized officer sign. If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign, but only one signature is required. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.Corporation. 36680 191205 VF


LOGO


LOGO